• Zement
    link
    fedilink
    31 hour ago

    So he is qualified. Only Rapists are allowed in.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Seriously, it wasn’t even as lite as the titile makes it out to be.

      “Gaetz did drugs while paying a child who hadnt even made it to her final year of high school while serving as a GOP representative and the GOP covered for him” would be more accurate

  • @Rakonat
    link
    English
    114 hours ago

    Paragon of conservative virtues and former leading figure of elected government officials, everyone.

    • @Sam_Bass
      link
      44 hours ago

      That finger gonna be wore down soon bubba

  • baltakatei
    link
    fedilink
    7523 hours ago

    Fixed: Matt Gaetz, former Trump AG pick, had sex with raped an underage girl while in Congress, House Ethics report says

    A minor cannot consent.

    • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
      link
      83 hours ago

      In Florida a 17 year old can consent.

      Matt Gaetz being older than 24 is the illegal part. He groomed a young girl.

      Also, because he paid her, then the offense involves the procurement of a person who is under 18 years of age, so the charge increases to a second degree felony, which can result in up to 15 years of imprisonment, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        360 minutes ago

        No she couldn’t consent to anyone over 24, which he was. Also, I would have to play catch-up, but if this is one of the girls he flew to New Jersey to have sex with… It’s sex trafficking a minor right?

      • Tiefling IRL
        link
        fedilink
        83 hours ago

        If it only costs $10,000 to do that then it’s only illegal for poor people

        • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
          link
          23 hours ago

          Welcome to America.

          Where “Speeding fine” has totally opposite meanings depending on how rich you are.

    • @Korne127
      link
      43 hours ago

      I don’t know about this case, I can definitely imagine him raping that girl.

      But from a European perspective, saying minors cannot consent is definitely one of these very stupid US takes. It is honestly insane that in the US 18 is treated like a god, and if one partner is some months older, it’s illegal.
      Obviously, minors can generally be influenced more easily than older people, and it’s important to have safeguards in place, but such a statement is just genuinely ridiculous.

      • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
        link
        451 minutes ago

        That’s not the case in this scenario, and rarely is. It varies by state, but Romeo and Juliet laws are common, which cover these kinds of circumstances.

        Basically, the law will set an acceptable age gap where consent can happen; If the gap is 5 years, then a 17 year old won’t be able to consent to sex with a 30 year old, but can with an 18-22 year old. So it helps maintain the “this is obviously a child who was groomed by a creepy middle-aged person” statutory rape laws, while still allowing kids to date each other.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          124 minutes ago

          In some states they just straight up do the European thing where all that matters is being at least 16. In my state the age of consent is 16 and that’s also the age where you can be tried as an adult. They recently voted on whether or not to raise the age, and they decided no.

          There is still push for that to be changed, though only for the age of being tried as an adult. The former they’re kinda keen on keeping where it is.

      • @newDayRocks
        link
        21 hour ago

        It is honestly insane that in the US 18 is treated like a god, and if one partner is some months older, it’s illegal.

        You’ll be relieved to know that this is never the case.

  • @gift_of_gab
    link
    1141 day ago

    … had sex with an underage girl…

    So, rape? Underage people can’t consent, it’s rape. He’s a pedophile.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      551 day ago

      Yup. The report specifically found he violated FL statutory rape law, among other laws, but headlines continue to not call it what it is.

      • @gift_of_gab
        link
        2721 hours ago

        America’s willingness to elect pedophiles/rapists to the highest positions in their country is… baffling. To then have their news not even use those words just makes me worry so much for women in the US. Like seriously, ‘sex with underage girl,’ we have specific words for that. Embarrassing.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          123 minutes ago

          It is baffling, especially since this is the same country where people have been arrested for CP because they had photos of themselves.

          It’s the double standards in these laws that get me.

        • @Sam_Bass
          link
          34 hours ago

          Just look at religion for answers to that puzzle. The entire schtick is a manual for giving yourself and your friends easy outs from your constant and consistent bad behaviour

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      141 day ago

      inb4 the weirdos come saying “well she was 17, so he’s acktually a hebo whatever blah blah” as if it matters

  • @JeeBaiChow
    link
    2524 hours ago

    So why did it take so long to release the report? From well before the election iirc. How is this not in the publics interest? Release the ‘vote to release the report’ vote also?

    • @SkyezOpen
      link
      520 hours ago

      Evidently DOJ was investigating, so the ethics committee back burnered it. Then of course it went nowhere, and gaetz wasn’t pissing any republicans off at that moment so it wasn’t reopened right away.

  • @wizblizz
    link
    1711 day ago

    The correct phrasing is raped. He raped a child.

    • @lemmylommy
      link
      441 day ago

      No, he is influential and rich. So the most damning phrase can be „had sex with“. The alternatives were „seduced“ or „was seduced by“.

  • @Nightwingdragon
    link
    English
    401 day ago

    You know, I’m willing to believe that Gaetz genuinely didn’t know the girl’s age the first time they had sex. The report acknowledges as much. And I’m unwilling to accuse anybody, even someone as detestable as Gaetz, of something that they didn’t do especially when there’s evidence supporting their claim. And right now, there is plenty of evidence that he did not know she was underage when they had sex.

    The first time.

    Then he went back for seconds. Anyone who has ever been in an FWB relationship knows how it works. You don’t just sit there and make an appointment for every Tuesday afternoon to just get together and quietly fuck like you’re in a clinical trial or something. You don’t get into an FWB relationship without getting to know someone. There’s going to be small talk involved. Playful banter. Genuine conversation. And at some point in that conversation, age is going to come into play. Even if she doesn’t directly say “I’m 17!!!”, she’s going to mention how much she hates the classes she’s taking. Or her plans after she graduates. Or what she plans on being when she grows up. Or the fact she still lives at home. Something. Something is going to give away her age, or at the very least cause a reasonable person to at least start asking questions like “So what college do you go to?” to attempt to figure out how old she is.

    And even if she’s just being paid by an intermediary or something, small talk is still going to be involved. Even the most highly paid prostitute is going to engage in casual conversation to break the ice.

    However it ended up, if it just happened once, I’d be willing to bet he genuinely didn’t know her age. Then he went back for seconds. At that point, any reasonable person is going to believe he knew, and just didn’t care.

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      236 minutes ago

      The law specifically doesn’t make a distinction in cases like Gaetz’ because he paid her for it. The moment it becomes prostitution, any “I didn’t know” defense gets immediately disregarded. It’s to prevent child sex traffickers from claiming ignorance to plea down to a lesser charge.

      • @Nightwingdragon
        link
        English
        03 hours ago

        I know how strict liability crimes work. I’m saying that the fact that it’s a strict liability crime takes a valid option away from the defendant and is akin to railroading. If you’re at an event available only to wealthy, connected adults and their companions and you happen to get together with one of them, it’s reasonable to assume that the person you’re connecting with is a consenting adult. In fact, barring evidence to the contrary such as something she said, I would actually consider it unreasonable to assume that a 17 year old girl would have access to that party, or the wealth and connections needed to gain access. And I would consider it unreasonable and in fact rude to ask someone to verify their age at that particular type of gathering. With that said, I am well aware that the law doesn’t agree with me. I just think that the law happens to be wrong.

        • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
          link
          -13 hours ago

          I would consider it unreasonable and in fact rude for a 35 year old to even attempt to fuck a 17 year old who may look a few years older.

          Add payments into the mix and reasonableness goes out the window.

          • @Nightwingdragon
            link
            English
            22 hours ago

            Read my previous statements.

            His subsequent encounters? Yeah, that’s all on him. I’m just saying that in the specific context of their first encounter, he did not intend to have sex with a 17 year old girl, and had no reason to believe the girl was underage given the circumstances.

            The fact that he paid for sex is a different circumstance than paying for sex with a minor. They weren’t paying 17 year old girls $400 a whack for sex. They were paying girls $400 a whack for sex, and one of them happened to be 17 years old. I doubt the people who hired these girls were checking IDs or doing background checks. Regarding that first encounter, should Gaetz be held accountable for paying for sex and drugs? Absolutely. But he shouldn’t be getting extra punishment because she was a minor when there is no evidence he was searching for one.

            Everything after that is all on him.

    • layzerjeyt
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The committee said it found evidence that Gaetz did not learn the victim’s age until a month after they had sex. But “statutory rape is a strict liability crime,” the report said, referring to crimes that don’t require proof of intent for a conviction.

      • @Nightwingdragon
        link
        English
        24 hours ago

        And this is one of the problems with strict-liability crimes like this. Again, say what you will about being at a drug-fueled party in the first place, but Gaetz had every reason to believe he was engaging in consensual (if abhorrent) sexual activity with a willing adult. Everything else he did is 100% on him, but in this specific case, I can’t help but feel that the guy is getting railroaded. Especially since that is by far the most serious charge he is facing.

        • layzerjeyt
          link
          fedilink
          12 hours ago

          Gaetz had every reason to believe he was engaging in consensual (if abhorrent) sexual activity with a willing adult.

          what reason?

          • @Nightwingdragon
            link
            English
            148 minutes ago

            He was at a drug-fueled party with wealthy, well-connected people. There would be no reason to believe that a 17 year old girl would have the wealth or connections needed to gain access to that party. Most of the women attending the party were regular attendees. Gaetz had absolutely no reason (that we know of) to believe that the one girl that he randomly hooked up with at this party happened to be a minor that nobody had realized was 17. The report says as much. Now if anyone has any evidence that this specific girl was hired for Gaetz with the knowledge she was 17, then that’s a different story. But given everything we know, there was no reason to believe she was anything other than a consenting adult.

            That said, it’s kinda moot anyway. He only has a valid defense for the first time they hooked up. They had apparently met multiple times and while the report gives no indication that he knew of her age for over a month, I don’t think a reasonable person would hook up with someone multiple times and either not say how old she was or never give any indication that something may not be right. Something is going to slip in casual conversation. If they only hooked up the one time, I’d say the case was overblown and actually be on his side. But once he started going back for more, any defense of him not knowing her age becomes less and less believable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      431 day ago

      Hot take: the difference between 17 and 18 doesn’t actually matter, and the real problem is Matt Gaetz abused his position of power to coerce young, relatively powerless women into sex with him. Crossing the line of 17 vs 18 is so unimportant in this particular case. Matt Gaetz fights to maintain a system where young women have no power, and utilizes his socio-economic position in that system to sexually abuse those women. Whether she’s just finishing up high school, or in her first year of university, we’re still talking about a young women who feels like she needs that money to step forward in her life, and Matt Maetz, and many others like him, are responsible for creating that need. To then use that need to get sexual gratification from those same young women is fucking disgusting, whether or not she’s crossed the socially dictated line of “adulthood.”

      • @Nightwingdragon
        link
        English
        181 day ago

        Hot take: the difference between 17 and 18 doesn’t actually matter

        Oh it absolutely matters in 12 states in this country, including Florida.

        • @affiliate
          link
          131 day ago

          i think the person you’re replying to is making a normative claim. they’re talking about how there really isn’t much difference in maturity/development between a 17 year old and an 18 year old. both ages are way too young for this guy, not to mention the power imbalances, etc. but you’re right that as far as the law is concerned, there is a big difference between 17 and 18 year olds.

          • @Nightwingdragon
            link
            English
            51 day ago

            i think the person you’re replying to is making a normative claim.

            That much I agree with. There’s little to no practical difference. And in his defense, if anyone has been to a drug-fueled party, they can tell you how common anonymous (and sometimes public) sex happens. Say what you will about him being at a drug-fueled sex party in the first place, but if you’re at a drug-fueled party with a whole bunch of wealthy and well connected adults and engage in sexual activity, it’s not unreasonable to assume that the person you’re screwing is an adult.

            The difference between 17 and 18 can’t be brushed off, though, when that difference almost singlehandedly makes the difference between you getting the side-eye and getting a prison sentence.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      271 day ago

      Where are all the pizzagate dipshits now?

      • EleventhHour
        link
        English
        821 hours ago

        About to take elected office.

  • @eran_morad
    link
    701 day ago

    And bitches wonder why we’re cheering Luigi, when shit like this doesn’t even matter?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 hour ago

          A CEO is a position, not a person. Killing him isn’t any sort of defense when he isn’t actively endangering others.

          It’s murder, even if it’s justified. Stop these idiotic word games. They only weaken your position.

      • @eran_morad
        link
        38
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Thanks, but I’m 100% cool with vigilante justice for a man who profited at the death and misery of countless others. I’ll take Luigi’s justice when there is no alternative. And there is none, truly. Otherwise the rapists Gaetz and Trump would be rotting in prison.

        But hey: enjoy your moral high ground.

      • @Jarix
        link
        -51 day ago

        You can be, but the world will be a better place in 50 years if 7 billion people were murdered today ,so you also dont have to.

  • socsa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 day ago

    The pedophilia is coming from inside the party?!

    Also I love how every conservative is sprinting backwards with the goalposts here.

    • @SarcasticMan
      link
      37
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Sorry, you must have missed the meeting, we do not do repercussions for anyone worth more than $1 million and a light skin tone. As punishment, we will just give him a high-paying political pundit job on OAN. Thank you for your concerns and please get fucked. Sincerely, United States Judicial System.

      Edit: I can’t spell

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    461 day ago

    I seem to recall this asshat and his best buddy Fred Flintstone MTG going on about “groomers” all the time.

    Looks like we found the actual groomer.

    And as usual, it’s ALWAYS projection with the qons. Always.

    • EleventhHour
      link
      English
      421 hours ago

      Every accusation is a confession