Summary

The U.S. Judicial Conference announced it will not refer ethics allegations against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to the Justice Department.

The allegations involve undisclosed luxury trips funded by wealthy friends, which Thomas claims were exempt from disclosure due to personal ties.

Thomas agreed to updated reporting requirements on trips and gifts, addressing concerns about undisclosed luxury trips funded by wealthy benefactors.

Critics argue the decision underscores the need for Congress to establish mechanisms to enforce ethical standards for Supreme Court justices.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1573 days ago

    The rule of law is dead in America.

    Shoplift food for your family or smoke an herb that comes from the ground, and you go to jail. Take bribes and destroy the country for your own greed and selfishness, and they praise you and make you immune to all consequences.

  • @DandomRude
    link
    English
    65
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I think Thomas, like many other influential people, knows very well that he doesn’t have to fear any consequences or even prosecution in this system, which this decision now confirms once again. That was to be expected, because why should anything have changed. I mean, Thomas was already obviously corrupt way back in 2000, when he was already a supereme court justice and, together with his cronies, prevented the recount of the votes in Florida, which meant that Bush became president instead of Gore. Incidentally, his billionaire buddy Harlan Crow was also already involved back then. So he has been doing this for more than 25 years in such a brazen manner and has simply remained true to himself - and only to himself.

  • P_P
    link
    fedilink
    English
    753 days ago

    The U.S. is such a shithole.

    • Skvlp
      link
      fedilink
      153 days ago

      On track to becoming a banana republic, if grownups don’t intervene.

  • Ebby
    link
    fedilink
    98
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Why would they?

    Infighting weakens the caste. Besides, what are you going to do about it?

    • FartsWithAnAccent
      link
      fedilink
      433 days ago

      I’m gonna make snarky posts about it, that’ll show em!

      They’re reading this, right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        383 days ago

        Someone’s going to channel Luigi and shoot some of these corrupt justices dead, and I’m not going to be mad about it at all.

        • @frunch
          link
          93 days ago

          I’m sure the news outlets will be scratching their heads as they can’t seem to find people disappointed or upset about it. Hell, maybe we’ll get some fiery op-eds from judicial scholars unironically talking about how supreme court just doesn’t pay like it used to, just to balance the equation.

          The corruption is so blatant anymore, really makes you wonder when the bottom is gonna fall out or if it already has

        • @PunnyName
          link
          103 days ago

          I might start praying again.

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        13 days ago

        The people tasked with upholding the status quo are.

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      23 days ago

      Judges have been a pretty partisan issue for a while now, but I do agree there is jack shit that can be done about it right before another Trump admin and GOP senate.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    403 days ago

    Someone remind me which one of them is Clarence Thomas:

      • Flying Squid
        link
        123 days ago

        I couldn’t tell you. All SCOTUS justices look alike to me once they put on the uniform.

        But it’s got to be one of them.

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      13 days ago

      Even if they refer them now, the DOJ and AG are about to be under new management soon.

  • Franklin
    link
    303 days ago

    Of course that would require them to have ethics as well.

    • @ZoopZeZoop
      link
      12 days ago

      Probably not, but he’d have an opportunity to replace him with someone at least as bad. So, you never know.

  • @finitebanjo
    link
    123 days ago

    Can you blame at this point? The new admin is talking about ending the DOJ and putting a Pedophile in as AG.

    The old AG sucks ass, too, he basically caused the Trump admin by not persecuting Donny.

    • @I_Has_A_Hat
      link
      3
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Gaetz hasn’t been considered for AG for months now.

      • @finitebanjo
        link
        -13 days ago

        I used the same level of scrutiny to vet my statement about the new AG as republicans used to investigate the pet eating claims.

  • misterdoctor
    link
    133 days ago

    Of course they won’t. Zero chance he’s the only supreme court justice who did this shit, he’s just the only one stupid enough to get caught. Or the only one evil enough to be so brazen.

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    43 days ago

    Obviously because the laws only apply to us regular people.