• circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    635 hours ago

    When will we start holding these people accountable? It is easy to say “corporations are bad” and then sit on your hands. It’s different to start calling out the people who ultimately make the corporations evil.

    We have whole classes of people comfortable fucking people over – sometimes with deadly consequences.

  • FartsWithAnAccent
    link
    fedilink
    966 hours ago

    This shit is straight up evil, will the company be held accountable for their crimes? This is what our justice system is for. Based on what we know so far, more crimes would be bound to come out in an investigation.

    • @Lon3star
      link
      234 hours ago

      The justice system that just allowed a convicted criminal to run out the clock on a heinous crime and become president

    • @thesohoriots
      link
      English
      194 hours ago

      It’s not the justice system, it’s the legal system

      • @Blumpkinhead
        link
        34 hours ago

        Can we start using the justice system instead, then?

        • @Machinist
          link
          English
          32 hours ago

          That system seems to be malfunctioning severely. Bypassing that system has physical risks to the user and should not be attempted lightly.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 hours ago

            That system seems to be malfunctioning severely.

            Pressing all buttons I can reach to doubt this take.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      366 hours ago

      Even if they’re held to account there just gonna Texas two step and declare bankruptcy.

      And then spin up another subsidiary and start over,

      • @Tylerdurdon
        link
        195 hours ago

        I wish it wasn’t the case. "Corporations are people too should go both ways… Death penalty if you do evil enough crimes.

      • FartsWithAnAccent
        link
        fedilink
        175 hours ago

        Individuals who committed these crimes on behalf of the company should be charged with fraud a the very least.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 hours ago

      US Government: Best I can do is a slap on the wrist to the tune of about 0.0000001% of their yearly profits and a hardy, “don’t do that.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 hours ago

      From where I’m sitting, the justice system seems to be more interested in investigating poor individuals than rich companies. I can’t think of many modern examples of rich companies (or even people) being held accountable for something that didn’t involve stealing from other rich people.

      • @krashmo
        link
        53 hours ago

        There’s examples but they aren’t proportional. Oh, a company with 3 billion in revenue poisoned the water supply for a whole county? Let’s fine them $10 million.

        That definitely teaches them a lesson about consequences, except the lesson is that they don’t matter.

    • Chainweasel
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Edit:
      I’m an idiot

  • @Veedem
    link
    English
    155 hours ago

    Unchecked capitalism is really something, huh?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          285 hours ago

          Because it’s a stupid, non standard way to say it. I understood it fine but I still thought it was a needless abbreviation.

          • @P1nkman
            link
            -12 hours ago

            K = kilo, which stands for 1000. It’s extremely standard. Saying it’s stupid is like saying $ or π or & or # or % is stupid.

            • @lunarul
              link
              31 hour ago

              1k is a common way to shorten 1,000. And 1,000% is an acceptable way to say 10x. But 1k% is definitely a stupid abbreviation that nobody uses.

            • @jeffwM
              link
              105 hours ago

              It’s literally the stupidest possible way to write it

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                34 hours ago

                Okay. I don’t typically get that caught up in the formatting of a number if the meaning is clear. 1k means 1000 in basically every context, and a unit indicator doesn’t make it more confusing to me. Are you likewise baffled by something being written as “1km”?

      • @workerONE
        link
        8
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Yeah 1000% is 10x but they were charged 11x what they should have paid. Overcharged by (over) 10x.

      • @Hawke
        link
        4
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        11 times what they should have paid unless you think that “overcharging by 100%” would be charging exactly the right price or if you feel that all medication should be free somewhat cheaper. Or more expensive. Whichever way the math works for that.

        • @Cort
          link
          55 hours ago

          They were charged 11x what they should have paid. they were overcharged 10x, because they would still have been expected to pay the original (1x) charge.

          The 1k% refers to the overcharge, so they are technically correct.

          • @Hawke
            link
            35 hours ago

            Ah I suppose so.

            Like everyone else here, I also hate this use of a perecentage.

            It’s better than “0.01 cents” used to mean “1 cent”

  • @DaddleDew
    link
    8
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    So people are going to jail over this and proper hard measures are going to be taken to address the obvious imbalance of power that allows companies like this to do this over and over again right? They’re not just going to give the company another slap on the wrist fine that won’t even cover how much money they’ve stolen from people, leaving them still making a profit for doing this and leaving the door wide open for more abuse like that to happen over and over again, right?

    Right?

  • @rational_lib
    link
    -3
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    UnitedHealth, employer of slain exec Brian Thompson

    Not quite correct sort of. This is OptumRx, which is owned by United Health Group, which also owns United Health Care, which Brian Thompson was nominally the CEO of. In other words, this is like the sibling of the company Brian Thompson ran.

    To be clear, Brian Thmpson wasn’t a billionaire, he was a mid-level at best millionaire worth only $41 million. He was just another star-bellied prole who thought he was in the aristocracy.

    Point being, the whole thing is stupid. The health care system, the people getting rich off it, Luigi’s reaction to it, our reactions to it, the media’s reporting on it, all of it.

    • @rektdeckard
      link
      11
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      What part about our reaction, or Luigi’s, is stupid? Is it maybe, just maybe, totally justifiable anger?

      • @rational_lib
        link
        -11 hour ago

        Justifiable anger can be stupid and usually is.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      21 hour ago

      As many people here can tell you, I am not cheering on the idea of assassinating CEOs as a way of making systemic change because I simply do not think it will work.

      That said, I 100% sympathize with Luigi Mangione and I 100% understand exactly why he did what he did. He was driven to the breaking point by a heartless company that, like all healthcare companies and, in fact, all for-profit companies in America that put their profits over human health and life.

      He was desperate and driven to the brink of madness by the system that should have been helping him. Of course he did what he did. I’m honestly amazed someone hadn’t done it sooner.

      I still don’t think it will solve a damn thing, and neither will killing a half dozen more healthcare CEOs if that happens, but I will totally understand if it happens again and likely sympathize with the killer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      What are you trying to say? That you could do a better job then Luigi?

      Brian Thompson was accessible and his location was known. Probably why Luigi allegedly went after him.

  • @Serinus
    link
    -216 hours ago

    Please don’t violate LW’s ToS. Be aware of what you’re posting publicly. This is not a bar with your friends. This is the internet where things are recorded forever and can possibly link back to you/us with consequences. It’s not that hard to express yourself without breaking the rules.

    • Cris
      link
      English
      146 hours ago

      What did they do that broke ToS? It looks like the post may have been edited

      • @Serinus
        link
        -5
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Nothing yet. I’m just hoping people think a little before they do things to get banned/removed. The rules are for everyone’s benefit.

        This is a post that will rightfully make people angry.

          • @Serinus
            link
            43 hours ago

            Yeah, it turns out threats of terrorism can look bad for you if they’re ever uncovered.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            -2
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Serinus is correct. They are rules to the benefit of everyone who wishes Lemmy.world to stay up which, since you’re here, presumably includes you.

            The server is in The Netherlands. The Netherlands does not have freedom of speech. Calling for violence is illegal there.

            If mods left calls for violence up all the time, there’s a good chance Lemmy.world could get shut down. Considering how much you participate here, I’m guessing you would not care for that.

            Edit: Always love it when this explanation gets downvotes but the downvoters don’t actually chime in and say that yeah, they’d be fine if Lemmy.world gets shut down as long as they get to say what they want, when they want, wherever they want. Maybe if you just admitted it instead of getting pissed off at someone pointing out that speech can have negative consequences…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 minutes ago

              Always love it when this explanation gets downvotes but the downvoters don’t actually chime in and say that yeah, they’d be fine if Lemmy.world gets shut down as long as they get to say what they want, when they want, wherever they want. Maybe if you just admitted it instead of getting pissed off at someone pointing out that speech can have negative consequences

              Why, when you understand the meaning with a simple downvote?

              Don’t call a place .world and then host it somewhere with pathetic laws regarding the main topic of the website: speech. Well, unless you want everyone else to rightfully call out the stupidity and patheticness of such a move

              There’s your reply

        • Cris
          link
          English
          5
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Ohhhh. That makes more sense now. Thank you for clarifying :)