A new paper from researchers at Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon University finds that as humans increasingly rely on generative AI in their work, they use less critical thinking, which can “result in the deterioration of cognitive faculties that ought to be preserved.”

The researchers recruited 319 knowledge workers for the study, who self reported 936 first-hand examples of using generative AI in their job, and asked them to complete a survey about how they use generative AI (including what tools and prompts), how confident they are the generative AI tools’ ability to do the specific work task, how confident they are in evaluating the AI’s output, and how confident they are in their abilities in completing the same work task without the AI tool. Some tasks cited in the paper include a teacher using the AI image generator DALL-E to create images for a presentation about hand washing at school, a commodities trader using ChatGPT to “generate recommendations for new resources and strategies to explore to hone my trading skills,” and a nurse who “verified a ChatGPT-generated educational pamphlet for newly diagnosed diabetic patients.”

Overall, these workers self-reported that the more confidence they had in AI doing the task, the more they observed “their perceived enaction of critical thinking.” When users had less confidence in the AI’s output, they used more critical thinking and had more confidence in their ability to evaluate and improve the quality of the AI’s output and mitigate the consequences of AI responses.


So this means they’re gonna stop shoving CoPilot down everyone’s throats, right??

This is literally my main gripe with AI being shoved into everything (I have many gripes, but this is the main one lol). Reading comprehension skills are already in the shitter, and this is only making them worse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 day ago

    So this means they’re gonna stop shoving CoPilot down everyone’s throats, right??

    soon as people get too dumb to use it.

    but by then, there will be the implants. so nbd.

  • @over_clox
    link
    61 day ago

    I once asked AI how to inflate a foldable phone. It actually gave me instructions!

    • @cornshark
      link
      213 hours ago

      It sounds like you’re joking or maybe referring to something unusual—are you asking about unfolding a foldable phone, fixing a screen issue, or something else? Let me know what you mean, and I’ll help!

      • @over_clox
        link
        210 hours ago

        Yeah, AI is generally a bit smarter these days when asked that question, but when I first asked Google’s AI that question, the answer it gave might as well have been a list of exact proper instructions on how to inflate a bicycle tire, but replaced the words bicycle tire with foldable phone 😂

  • @reddig33
    link
    -8
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Isn’t this what researchers said about searching with Google? Isn’t this what your math teacher told you about using a calculator?

    As much as I think most AI is bullshit, I have my doubts about it rotting your brain.

    • paw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Actually are brains are plastic and can adapt to our inputs. If we focus our selves to reading long essays then our brain adapts and it will get more convenient or easier, less exhausting to read long essays. If we focus on small tik tok videos, our brain adapts as well and we find it easier or mire convenient to watch these Videos. Reading long essays will get more exhausting then.

      So, our brains adapted to the calculator and most of us now are worse in calculating a logarithm with pen and paper then our ancestors. Is this a good thing? It depends. I personally believe, that getting worse at critical thinking, as the report suggests, is not a good thing.

      Will I use LLMs in the future? Probably yes, but I will be even more careful with the generated text I get back.