• hoch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        4 months ago

        You gotta wonder if today’s fight with the previous commander of the ISS had anything to do with it.

        It would be the most petty, dumb, and childish thing to call for the de-obiting of the ISS over a tweet, but my expectations for him get lower each day.

        • KaRunChiy@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          4 months ago

          Musk is such a miserable pile of trash that it’s insulting he even has a 1/100th the influence he has

        • Don_alForno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh, so Elon offered a nonsensical rescue plan for publicity reasons and is upset that it was turned down?

          Funny. Just like when these people were stuck in that cave in Thailand and Elon offered a nonsensical rescue plan for publicity reasons and was upset that it was turned down.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            This is the Thai cave rescue all over again.

            So far he hasn’t accused anyone of being a pedophile yet, so Yei?

      • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        Reaching escape velocity is expensive. We can be more efficient and still achieve the same result using a minuscule fraction of the propellant and none of the rocket framing.

        • Vandals_handle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          A trebuchet will achieve the same result and require none of the rocket framing.

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          I mean we’re already sending rockets up there. I’m sure we can afford to dump him out on the way.

          • riodoro1Banned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            MelodiousFunk does have a point. Shooting him is cheaper.

              • AngryCommieKender
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Trebuchet? Cheap? ✅. Easily assembled and transported? ✅. Low tech not needed any rare earth materials? ✅. Sufficient to launch him at least 150 m? ✅. Low survivability rate for potential additional yeeting? ✅.

                • superkret@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Hmm, I think we shouldn’t rule out other simple machines with wooden frames and French names just yet.

              • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Just hogtie him and leave him on the lauch pad. We get rid of a problem, and the problem is turned into mostly it’s component atoms. Give giving the circle of life a little help!

              • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                To be clear, I am not advocating for shooting Musk. I am saying we can ignite a fraction of the rocket fuel without any of the containment vessels or expensive infrastructure. While there will be no liftoff, it would certainly be uplifting.

  • breadsmasher
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    most likely because he wants to launch his own and charge america through the nose

  • nilo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why wouldn’t he? Now even more money can flow towards spacex’s not-gonna-happen goal of going to Mars.

    • sunflowercowboy@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Simpsons did it first! In an episode the rich and smart were sent on a ship as the earth is ending. Thought the smart folks will just be replaced by AI at this point. Once it becomes a reliable repository for knowledge - meaning no ‘need’ for fart smellas smart fellas.

      The conclusion of such an approach is even broached by Wall-E, disney of all folks.

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    Elon Musk is also an idiot so why should we be listening to him? He already sees business opportunity for his bullshit SpaceX or some shit.

  • TropicalDingdong
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Remember the 4chan post about a crack in the ISS.

    Accelerationist pepperidge farms remembers…

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think that’s probably the instigating factor. He saw on Twitter that the ISS has a big crack and the government is covering it up, he decided it’s true because in his mind trolls on the internet have a higher level of authority than any expert or scientist, and now he has to insist on deorbiting it to prove himself right instead of backing down or listening to any reason to the contrary.