• @Rhoeri
    link
    English
    537 minutes ago

    Dictators generally don’t concern themselves with what their subjects think.

  • WrenM
    link
    434 minutes ago

    Oh no! Wormtongue isn’t popular amongst those that didn’t vote for him?

    Say it ain’t so!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    He doesn’t care about being popular or unpopular. He’s the king now, he can do whatever he wants.

    • thermal_shock
      link
      English
      252 minutes ago

      Oh idk, musk/zuck definitely have masculinity and self confidence issues. They have to buy their “man” card and seek approval from everyone. I think trump is similar, he’s melted down before over dumb shit.

  • @SocialMediaRefugee
    link
    103 hours ago

    He doesn’t care what people think as long as he has power. He could steer a ship into rocks, sink and his die hard supporters would blame Biden/Obama or anyone else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 hour ago

        We are boycotting everything the us makes. Plus when you guys get here, I’m not gonna lay down and take it and neither will the rest of us. I plan and fighting tooth and nail to stay canadian.

          • @Rhoeri
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            35 minutes ago

            There’s dumb people all over. They’re not just here in America. Some people won’t see nuance or reason, but instead, what they want things to be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 hours ago

          Lol, so, literally true, but not for the reason they thought…

          I love it, I wouldn’t even have thought to check…

  • @SocialMediaRefugee
    link
    2
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    43 percent support what Trump has done in his first month

    43% would touch a hot oven burner

  • @ikidd
    link
    English
    147 hours ago

    So does “tanking” mean being laid in front of a tank and run over multiple times?

    Because I can get behind this.

    • @TastyWheat
      link
      14 hours ago

      Time to start a other shitty TokTik trend!

      insert shitty AI voice “Only billionaires can afford to do this challenge!”

  • @mint_tamas
    link
    5117 hours ago

    The entire point of Musk being so visible is to pin all the unpopular stuff on him.

    • @SocialMediaRefugee
      link
      13 hours ago

      Every dictator needs toadies to do their dirty work though. Hitler had his Himmler, Stalin his Beria.

    • @CharlesDarwin
      link
      English
      69 hours ago

      Thing is that Bronzo the Clown looks like a cuck even to a redcap when you watch fElon and Hannity talking over him, or fElon and his kid in the WH doing more talking than Bronzo as he sits there looking like he’s sundowning.

  • @Treczoks
    link
    2817 hours ago

    It gives Democrats an opening - in two years, if there are still elections.

    • @SocialMediaRefugee
      link
      33 hours ago

      Assuming they get off their asses and vote this time. Also they need to learn their lesson and focus on a few issues and more on working class American economic issues and less on identity politics.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 hours ago

      Lol elections. You don’t think they’ve planned for that? There won’t be elections in 2 years. He’s gutted half the government already.

    • @TrueStoryBob
      link
      8
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I keep seeing this… folks really think we’re gonna get to vote again.

      • @Treczoks
        link
        14 hours ago

        America follows the course of Nazi Germany. The US had their Machtergreifung, and if they might get the next Democratic elections in (1949-1933)=16 years, after the Americans came in and stopped the Nazis. Oh, wait…

      • @Saljid
        link
        47 hours ago

        Oh, you will. In the same sense that Russia has elections.

      • @rational_lib
        link
        2
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        How are they going to stop it? Republicans have been trying to stop elections since 2017, they’re not smart enough to figure out how. They couldn’t even figure out how to schedule a press conference about it at the four seasons.

          • @JcbAzPx
            link
            English
            12 hours ago

            If you piss off enough people, gerrymandering stops mattering.

  • Da Cap’n
    link
    fedilink
    English
    991 day ago

    Why would Elmo care about his approval ratings? He’s not an elected official.

    • @kreskin
      link
      119 hours ago

      Because he’s a narcissist. He cant help but care.

      • @notsoshaihulud
        link
        13 hours ago

        he’ll just run the poll on X and his narcissistic injury is healed.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      8
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      He cannot stand people not liking him. He’s a weird little dude that needs everyone to love him.

      • @tomi000
        link
        37 hours ago

        Nah, not everyone. He just needs a group of people giving him approval and recognition. His edgelord personality needs people hating him.

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    2391 day ago

    The last poll they cared about was in early November 2024.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      916 hours ago

      Approval always matters, even without democracy.

      Democracy is just a managed, fairly agreed upon process for a governed people to exercise their will. But a governed people always have the ability to exercise their will. Authoritarian tactics can make that more difficult, but they cannot ever prevent it.

      Remember, if there was nothing people could do to stop them, their propaganda would not be necessary. The fact that they are engaged in information control demonstrates that they do very much care about approval - or, at least, acceptance.

    • @horse_battery_staple
      link
      106
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Exactly, fascists give zero fucks about public sentiment once they’re in power. All they need to do is control the media and polls will align with their goals again. Case in point is the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico

      https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-02-19/donald-trump-gulf-of-mexico-gulf-of-america

      Edit as things are moving very fast.

      Here’s an even more boldfaced attempt at controlling the media. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fox-news-newsmax-oppose-trump-ap-ban_n_67b85283e4b05145b9c53cce

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 day ago

      It’s a knee jerk reaction for many to want polls to still matter. Polls are important of course, but not this year and next year is uncharted territory.

      The only thing to do watch now is the comfort zone of the 10,000+ people in the American billionaire families; and that is the only check in power right now

      • @horse_battery_staple
        link
        18
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’d be surprised if there aren’t massive changes to gun laws in the next 2 years and a giant restructure of the military in the next 3 so that Trump or one of his cronies can still be in power in 5…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 day ago

          I’m wondering when private gun ownership will be banned. At the rate they’re going it might happen within 6 months.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
            link
            231 day ago

            There are basically only two lines that this administration can cross after which it will be, to employ the vernacular, on.

            • Cancelling retirees’ social security and/or retirement benefits
            • Trying to take everyone’s guns

            The major difference is that one those groups is preeminently equipped to make that process very difficult. I’ll bet you can guess which one it is.

            The one thing that every paranoid loon agrees on – left or right – is that the US government actually attempting to blanket confiscate guns is the 100% unquestionable and unambiguous indicator of everything going absolutely sideways. This is why gun bans have always been incremental; those in politics absolutely know that the end result of trying to do it all at once is only a guarantee that a lot of people get shot.

            Watching all the rednecks try to reconcile that it is in fact Trump’s gubmint that is comin’ to a’take their gunz is going to be quite the spectacle, I’m sure.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              191 day ago

              The same 2a guys who cheered when Trump said take the guns first? Boomers who found out their precious affordable healthcare was the same as Obama care and still voted Trump twice… (X) Doubt. It’s a cult only one way it ends.

              • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
                link
                12
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                The difference is all the gun totin’ Trump voters genuinely believed, either via self delusion or with the assistance of right wing media, that Trump wouldn’t take their guns. They made up any number of excuses to rationalize what was said in order to maintain support for their man. “He didn’t actually mean it.” “He was just speaking figuratively.” “It was taken out of context.” Etc., etc.

                That will last only right up until he actually does this. Never mind that it’s already too late in that they voted for him. I am predicting that exact moment is when the realization will finally set in. I’m sure many will probably also try to cope by trying to find someone else to blame. That won’t change the fact that in the moment, regardless of the rationale, showing up in a uniform and trying to kick in a paranoid nut’s door and tell him you’re here for his guns is a monumentally stupid idea. The element of surprise will surely work in the feds’ favor only until it comes out that the first gun owner has been killed as a result of a mass confiscation incident.

                Both sides will ultimately and inevitably decide that “shoot first, ask questions second” will be the only viable strategy. Except it isn’t, when both sides are doing it. The only winning move is not to play.

          • @horse_battery_staple
            link
            14
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            All gun control in the past has been to disarm marginalized populations and put ownership behind a paywall and within a national registry. I don’t think they’ll ban gun ownership for everyone, however I foresee ownership to be much more stringently controlled and for tax stamps to increase. Making it so that the majority of guns are still owned and operated by white middle to upperclass men, or private security and law enforcement that serve the wealthy to protect property and the current power structure as it stands.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_United_States

            https://socialistra.org/

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 day ago

              Fascism rarely plays well with personal gun ownership. Trump has already floated the idea once, so he’s definitely going to try.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 day ago

      Yeah I don’t think either of them would care in the slightest about this type of polling.

      Entirely predictable.

      Trump was mocking the voting public on presidents day with that “Long live the king” quip.

      That said, it’s just bonkers that 40% of voters feel like things are going in the right direction. Honestly the whole thing is cooked.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    781 day ago

    Wouldn’t it be good news for trump if musk is tanking? Maybe he resigns and trump becomes president

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      451 day ago

      How awesome would it be for him to get arrested and not pardoned because Trump blames him for tanking his poll numbers

      • partial_accumen
        link
        141 day ago

        trump controls the justice department in the executive, and GOP has firm control over the Judicial branch at the Supreme Court. Musk hasn’t made friends of the GOP Washington power brokers. So trump could vindictively railroad musk through whatever remains of the justice system, and there would be no one that would stand and fight for Musk (except maybe Putin).

        It might descend into one of those bizzaro world scenarios where “free market” Republicans call for and get the nationalization of SpaceX as a strategic asset (with its tight control of US military launch capabilities and Starlink network). Lefties would be uncomfortably cheering on the GOP for “seizing the means of production” in the form of Musk’s companies.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 day ago

          As a lefty, no I wouldn’t. If our government is a dictatorship, then this would hardly be an example of seizing the means of production, just a change of hands from one unelected dictator to another.

          Still, funny mental image.