- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Donald Trump just imposed a 25 percent tariff on virtually all goods produced by America’s two largest trading partners — Canada and Mexico. He simultaneously established a 20 percent across-the-board tariff on Chinese goods.
As a result, America’s average tariff level is now higher than at any time since the 1940s.
Meanwhile, China and Canada immediately retaliated against Trump’s duties, with the former imposing a 15 percent tariff on American agricultural products and the latter putting a 25 percent tariff on $30 billion of US goods. Mexico has vowed to mount retaliatory tariffs of its own.
This trade war could have far-reaching consequences. Trump’s tariffs have already triggered a stock market sell-off and cooling of manufacturing activity. And economists have estimated that the trade policy will cost the typical US household more than $1,200 a year, as the prices of myriad goods rise.
All this raises the question: Why has the US president chosen to upend trade relations on the North American continent? The stakes of this question are high, since it could determine how long Trump’s massive tariffs remain in effect. Unfortunately, the president himself does not seem to know the answer.
In recent weeks, Trump has provided five different — and contradictory — justifications for his tariffs on Mexico and Canada…
…more in the article.
You must log in or register to comment.
I know why he did it. Because that’s what his best best friend from Kremlin said and his two last working brain cells are in vacation playing golf.
He probably doesn’t understand that if US stops all trading will become just a bigger North Korea with nukes.
I don’t think Trump knows very much about anything he’s doing, whether this or anything else.
(Incidentally, this also means I don’t think he’s doing most of the bad things he’s doing out of malice or dictatorial ambitions. He just has no idea about anything he’s doing.)
Am I the only one surprised at how low the cost per household could be? I keep thinking it should be quite a bit higher.
It’s part of their plan to eliminate the IRS and federal taxation, to be replaced by a universal sales tax. However, trump doesn’t have the authority to do that. But he can tariff. And a tariff is a little bit like a sales tax.
Therefore, we get tariffs.
Now, the other problem is that the tariff revenue is going to be like 1/10 that of the IRS tax revenue, which will require a 90% reduction in federal spending. Including defense, research, healthcare, and social security. Can’t collect social security tax if the IRS doesn’t exist either, so social security is getting axed.
It will of course make 56 million seniors homeless, but thats a small price to pay for a 15% pay bump for me!
The big corps can weather the storm, smalls will have to sell, consolidate and monopolize is the plan as I see it
Judging by what happened back in 2008 no, big corps just go under. They will not survive this.
Yeah, they have no savings because they plow all profits into stock buy backs. Hell, a lot of them have borrowed money to do buy backs.
Either that or Trump is following orders.
I mean, it’s getting harder and harder each day to argue against him deliberately destroying the west.
He’s following orders but he forgot what they were, too.
It’s deeper than that. Putin conditioned the dementia into him, so once the orders are carried out, he forgets
Like a Manchurian Canadiate?
But backwards. A Candidate Manchurian
But backwards again, the nairuhcnaM etadidnaC.
Sure, but instead of individual targets it’s the USA
Yeah that’s the conclusion isn’t it
Trump’s ‘beautiful’ tariffs are just ugly taxes on consumers and businesses alike.
🐱
Market manipulation. He is also a TV show host, so he is a showman. He likes creating drama.
He is famous for bad management, causing his casinos to go bankrupt. His management style is going to bankrupt US and somehow make him richer.
Actually in his previous presidency he managed to lose personal wealth rather than increase it. He is so incompetent he can’t even enrich himself with 4 years of being president lol.
Why can’t we make him unalive? He wouldn’t be able to play with WWIII that way…
Or just watch him bankrupt USA just like his casino, I think US need to go through that pain to realize why they should not vote for a showman, TV show host again.
Sun Tzu: “Never interrupt your opponent while he is in the middle of making a mistake.”
Just my opinion as a layman: the tariffs give his corporate backers all the excuse they need to jack up prices even higher.
And when he takes the tariffs off, the prices never go back to the original starting point.
That, plus it seems very likely that he and friends are just manipulating the market to trade on the predictable moves he’s causing. Ya know, the kinda stuff that earned Musk some mild hand slaps and theatrical pearl clutching (in addition to giant financial benefits) in recent years.
It’s basically how Musk got rich. Intelligent market manipulation.
That’s a weird way to write inheritance.
Musk didn’t inherit billions.
How much was his dads gemstone mining business worth?
Less than a billion dollars.
Do you actually know how much it was worth though?
Agree, inflation can theoretically increase not only prices, but wages to compensate the increased cost of living, therefore appear as a boomed GDP, bringing the debt to GDP ratio lower without actually reducing debt. Eu, china, Russia all have much lower debt to GDP. Of course in reality inflation is hard to manage once it gets out of hand, and the levels of interest rates don’t give enough space for corrections, and the problem of inflation being the reduced consumption leading to a lesser increase of GDP.
GDP is always calculated in nominal and real (inflation adjusted) GDP.
Inflation does not reduce debt to GDP by increasing the perceived GDP, but by devalueing the debt owned, as it is a fixed sum with usually interest rates fixed for a certain time
yup, it forces everyone to raise prices, including competitors.
Look at the Project 2025 document, its supposedly written by the heritage foundation but has a section on building a border wall and doing capital punishment. Its clearly crafted by Trump.
Inside it talks about tariffs, using them to force other countries to lower their tariffs against the US. I assume its meant to force a free trade agreement that is 100% free trade, and not a misnomer like it is now, he wants the massive shock so that country are entirely submissive.
You think trump is capable of not just coming up with the worst political takes known to man, but also is even aware of that much policy?
I think you give him way more credit than he deserves
Seems like it’s not going according to plan then huh. US opponents are anything but submissive right now. I don’t think US has the capacity for a long game.
He had the idea to raise tariffs, and he believes all his ideas are really good, so he followed his own good advice and raised tariffs, dead simple.
Also Trump: Has anyone seen my tan spray? Sir, you left it in the fridge again. Here. That’s not it, that’s barbecue sauce!
Putin said: “go forth and break shit” and here we are.
yup. it’s successfully costing america its allies.
It’s not inappropriate though. I’ve been saying for years Canada should not be so closely allied with such a fickle country.
And economists have estimated that the trade policy will cost the typical US household more than $1,200 a year
Remember this, when you hear about tax cuts for the wealthy.
That’s chicken change if you make, say, $80K+. Significant if you make, say, $20K. (Thinking about individuals, not households, adjust accordingly. And COL is a huge thing depending.)
In any case, I’d take that number with a bucket of salt. Can’t see any way that number was calculated meaningfully this early in the game.
off topic, but what does your signature mean? can you really copyright your comments? I’ve never seen this before
It’s the equivalent of those Facebook posts you see telling Zuck that you don’t consent to your data being stored and sold.
can you really copyright your comments?
By default, everything you write, from a novel to an Internet forum shitpost, is not only copyrighted by you but also “all rights reserved.”
What that guy is doing is (a) making his writings more available for reuse than they would be otherwise, and (b) making a point about how fucked-up it is that corporations treat stuff posted to social media as if it were a free-for-all they could use however they want.
that’s what i thought. not sure if it is effective, but you do you!
not sure if it is effective
Well, if its good enough for ProPublica, and others, its good enough for me. 👍
all due respect, but you are not a news entity and you will never know whether your license was honored, so i really don’t see the point. but like i said, you do you
all due respect, but you are not a news entity and you will never know whether your license was honored, so i really don’t see the point. but like i said, you do you
The point is to have protection for my content. I have the same rights under the law as ANYBODY ELSE. All are capable of licensing their content on social sites that protects themselves with Safe Harbor laws.
As far as enforcement goes, that is not my job. If a law is not enforced doesn’t mean I don’t try to avail myself of the protections under the law. I don’t constantly audit my local police force to be sure that they are enforcing laws.
I want my content to be available and used by open-source organizations, and I signal that via my license. Otherwise the default licensing (show nothing) does not allow them to do so.
Finally, is it really worth your time (and all other citizens) to nag/harrass someone away from using the same laws that Corporations use to their benefit? I mean I point to an “Ask Lemmy” post often (here, let me do it again) where this has been hashed out already. You’re not saying anything new. But it seems like every individual still wants to recreate the conversation again, and again, and again, for SOME strange reason.
maybe if everyone is telling you the same thing, it’s not us that’s wrong? food for thought.
Funny, isn’t that the exact amount of the stimulus checks he handed out during his first presidency?
That is… less than I’d have guessed.
…willl cost the typical US household more than $1,200 a year…so far.
Apparently It’s supposed to get rid of the browns and the gays and the women and everyone else until it’s just a bunch of old white men sitting around, counting money, and masturbating to AI porn? Kind of like a hateful gross version of Scrooge McDuck.
It seems to be working, I signed my ticket out of here. I’m a brown and queer woman. Just need to survive until immigration goes through.
Godspeed friend, hope this place will be worthy of you again someday
If you don’t mind, how are you pulling it off? Just trying to get ideas too.
Work transfer through my day job. I will note I’m taking a 50% pay cut for this, but the mental security and new friends will be worth it
Spooge McFuck
Scrooge McDuck was also pretty awful. They had to invent a nemesis for him, Flintheart Glumgold, just to make him not seem so bad by comparison.
Donald is in indentured servitude after all. Gnarly man.
