• aarch0x40
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    9 days ago

    The US Attorney prosecuting misdemeanors as a priority now? How much more desperate is this adminstation trying to appear?

    • JollyG
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s only a misdemeanor because the injuries sustained were only categorized as boo-boos. If they had been ouchies, we would be looking at felony charges.

      • spongebue
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 days ago

        You don’t understand, he could smell the mustard! He probably hates mustard!

        • Baron Von J
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 days ago

          It was French’s mustard, clearly an illegal immigrant sandwich. This Dunn guy was aiding an illegal alien’s assault of an officer.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Woops, put a whole hell of a lot of cayenne peppers in there!

          Now… if that’s an attack with a chemica agent weapon… what is shooting someone in the face with a pepperball round?

      • halcyoncmdr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 days ago

        They tried for felony charges. Multiple times. The grand juries (plural) refused to indict.

    • mcv@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s not about the act itself, but about what it represents: resistance to the new regime. He needs to be made an example of just for that.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      This is still the “faking it” phase of “faking it till you make it.” Their heroic victim narrative requires a criminal conviction, whatever the charge. So yes, they’re desperate, like every con artist is desperate to maintain the facade until they secure the prize.

      Yes yes, we all know a conviction won’t disprove the obvious fact that they are hysterical infants in media tantrum, but like when she was still a screeching TV head, their Fox News anchor US Attorney is performing for an audience of one.

  • thesohoriots
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    9 days ago

    “What is the charge? Throwing a meal? A succulent cold-cut meal?”

  • spongebue
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    9 days ago

    For those who thought this guy was past this…

    A grand jury refused to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, part of a pattern of pushback against the Justice Department’s prosecution of surge-related criminal cases. After the rare rebuke from the grand jury, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office charged Dunn instead with a misdemeanor.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 days ago

    Technically, it was a “meat sandwich” thrown at “point-blank range” only to “explode” all over.

    *actual language from the trial. Probably the hottest action meal-team 6 ever got.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 days ago

    Clearly Trump is trying to make an example of him. A jury trial for a single misdemeanor? Either way, there’s good odds he’ll be financially ruined by the lawyer bill. A trial is a minimum of $15k to start.

    This will become an exemplar for We The People to self police going forward.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      If he hasn’t crowd funded his legal expenses it’s because he’s actively choosing not to. He could be grifting this so hard.

      • Alexstarfire
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Is it a grift if you need the money for the stated purpose?

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          No, I mean he could raise way more than his defense will cost. He’s kind of one of the mythic figures of the resistance.

          When the early revolution is recorded to history, we’ll remember such luminaries as the Portland Frog, Polka Dot Lady, and Sandwich Guy.

          • Alexstarfire
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            He probably could. IDK what people would do with the extra in that case, but even if they kept it I wouldn’t call it a grift. A grift is basically synonymous with scam. It requires being deceptive of either the purpose of collecting money or in the goods/service being provided.

          • mriormro@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Raising funds for self defense isn’t a grift. Do you not know what that word means?

      • madcaesar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Edit this comment and don’t call it a grift. Helping people fight fascist is not the same as biggots gifting after losing their job for attending Nazi rallies.

    • halcyoncmdr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      A jury trial for a single misdemeanor?

      That’s your right. The defendant can choose whether to have a jury or bench trial.

      Clearly in this case you want the jury. You want them to look at the ridiculousness of the case and throw it the fuck out regardless of the legality.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    If you throw a soft fluffy pillow or a submarine sandwich the punishment is the same? What about intent? Does that come into play? Oh, I forgot, there is no law anymore, just retribution.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    While it is of course illegal to throw anything at anyone this should be treated as civil disobedience or an act causing negligible societal harm and be dismissed.

  • al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.comBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    I mean that sandwich could have ignited and sprayed out noxious chemicals that irritated his eyes and throat, oh wait that’s fucking tear gas those racist fascist cowards are actual using on civilians.

  • einlander
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    They need for this to be a crime, otherwise it sets a precedent of what can be legally done to a federal agent without legally sanctioned retaliation.