• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m glad my fellow citizens saw through the bs and overrode my vote to keep us happy and safe.

    Disclaimer: I might have voted for him because lesser of, but fuck Biden and his ineffective admin. Hey libs: the orange man would have been in jail in a competently run country. Fucking travesty.

    • RampantParanoia2365
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      No he would not. He would be ina maximum security federal or military prison, not jail. He didn’t rob liquor stores.

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    According to MAGA, no war has yet occurred, only brief strikes & conflicts that quickly ended without declaration of war, which is technically true. This is how they rationalize it so far.

  • Randelung
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I can’t believe anyone actually bought that shit.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I don’t honestly think they really did. What they were sold was that the conservative leadership held the conservative individuals’ best interests lined up. Last time they didn’t get to execute their plan. This time no one was left to stop them.

      To that point, there are proud boys and neo nazies in positions of power. They’re wearing the gear and putting their slogans on things. The individuals have been told over and over that it’s the non-whites that are the cause of all their problems and they’re still on board with ethnic cleansing. They are just now starting to get somewhat disillusioned that things aren’t actually getting better for them even though the playbooks are being run.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The part about Biden is true enough. Republicans and Democrats are largely in agreement about the dismantling of the middle class and expansion of the empire. Democrats just want an orderly transition while Republicans want to burn it all down as fast as possible.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    For whatever reason this kind of campaign tactic had zero effective counter amongst the general electorate. This messaging won. Refuting it was left to the internet forums.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      How can you refuse this. It quickly turns into a “no u” situation.

      • yuri@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        by design! turns out if you just project hard enough, the only possible argument is a “no u” situation. and actually taking that position officially has been a bridge too far for any credible opposition up to now.

    • brucethemoose
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s because social media is toxic.

      Look at the view counts below conservative posts. That is why there is no counter; the game is rigged.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    People are just too fucking dumb. Most can only rationalize that current thing bad = current leader bad = different leader better, and there’s no end of grifters taking advantage of that.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      sexism and racism is what they voted for, cant have a black person they made that mistake in 08 with obama, plus no women ever.

    • solidheron@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      yeah primaries was a train wreak in slow mo. like I was telling people I did not give a crap that Kamala was chosen by Biden as a successor she’s still better than trump by far. I couldn’t really think of any reason from them to vote for trump

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m glad people are coming around on the idea that people are too stupid to vote.

      • Seth Taylor
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You’ve just reminded me of that clip of I can’t remember which middle-eastern dictator expressing his views on democracy and the average person’s intelligence

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Not in real life.

          I do dream of a government composed of a council of experts. Each person would be an expert in their field and they would br elected by their own peers. I think something like that would be better for humanity. If you look at the science communities you will see a lot of collaboration across boundaries and i think that’s one of our biggest problems.

          I’m not so delusional as to think it faultless, but an improvement, surely.

          • Seleni
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            The problem tends to be that (1) experts are only experts in their own fields, but have a distressing tendency to think that makes them experts in all fields and (2) an expert is often only an expert if unchallenged. Plenty of ‘experts’ have had their research get supplanted—or attempts have been made to supplant it—with newer, more accurate research, but the older so-called experts often fight against that newer research so as not to lose their exalted status. Sadly, you see often in science (look at how Louis Pasteur was treated when he dared to suggest bacteria caused disease).

            • Mac@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Yeah, absolutely. There would have to be levels of checks and balances just like any other governmental system.

              Yet, even with these problems i still think it would be an improvement.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          People are too fucking dumb [and] there’s no end to grifters taking advantage of that

          Maybe not, but these statements are directly applicable to voters and I think voting in an environment where bad actors can easily manipulate voters is irresponsible.

          Do you not agree?

    • solidheron@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Kinda, but there this saying I heard “hard to be moral when it means giving up your friend group”. So it seems like kinda need friend group that endorse left wing values

  • nexguy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    The protest non-voters fell for it. Now we get generations of destruction to hopefully heal from.

    • worhui
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      we aren’t going to live long enough to see healing.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Ironically under Biden yes they would be affected. Under Trump, well i won’t say they won’t be affected, but they won’t be drafted

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    One of the biggest problems with the Democrats’ campaign was they went all in on this “benevolent” interventionist policy, and denounced anyone who disagrees with it for any reason as a Russian bot. This papered over differences on the right and allowed Trump to simultaneously win over the libertarian isolationists who want to stay out of conflicts and the nationalists who want mask off imperialism, and that same inflexibility is what alienated the left.

    • solidheron@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      first time I’m hearing about Russian bots, but I’ve given up on democrats, i like them better when the DSA infiltrates’ their party

  • Fedizen
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    We were always at war with eurasia

  • balsoft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean only the last paragraph is wrong. A vote for Trump is a vote for even more war and quicker fascism.

  • WoodScientist
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    63
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, to be fair, every sentence except the last one was entirely true.

      • TrickDacy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, this fool is always happy to ignore reality, loudly.

      • WoodScientist
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        2 days ago

        What part of anything other than the last sentence is false? And don’t bring up Trump. We’re talking about Biden, not Trump. Some of us aren’t so blind to think that any criticism of Biden is an endorsement of Trump. Biden’s term ended with the US overseeing a brutal war in Gaza and a historic cost of living crisis. You don’t even have to speculate about what Biden would have done, you just have to look at what he actually did.

        Why do you think any criticism of Biden is an endorsement of Trump? You’re trapped in prison of “my team” political thinking. And this thinking is exactly what lead us to Trump in the first place.

        • azrv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Here’s the thing though - US voters went into an election with a binary winner-takes-all choice for the head of their executive branch in a country where the executive branch wields an immense amount of power. Some chose to not take part because neither candidate appealed to them. Many made that choice due to a candidate’s foreign policy positions. It is very reasonable to assume that those are votes that would have not gone to the more conservative/regressive side.

          Result: popular vote went to the regressives. And since foreign policy issues could very well have been a cause in this (i.e. people basing their choice to not vote on a candidate’s impacts on foreign populations), the end result is kind of ironic… The death and misery that will result from funding changes in things like PEPFAR, USAID, US funding contributions to various UN programs, refugee programs, etc. will far surpass anything happening in Gaza. Nevermind the incredible economic impacts (and very real resulting human consequences) of tariffs on people in so-called “shithole countries” - like me.

          And that’s not even mentioning the totally foreseeable domestic consequences that US voters are now seeing.

          So tell me again how choosing not to vote in the US presidential election was a morally sound choice?

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Biden’s term ended with the US overseeing a brutal war in Gaza and a historic cost of living crisis.

          Yes, I too remember the US invading Palestine to kidnap their leader. I too remember Biden saying they should turn Gaza into a giant casino and beach resort. I definitely remember Biden threatening to invade denmark if sweden won’t give him a medal.

          Why do you think any criticism of Biden is an endorsement of Trump?

          Well, you see, if there are two candidates, and you say “don’t vote for that one” it’s a defacto endorsement of the other.

          • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Well, you see, if there are two candidates, and you say “don’t vote for that one” it’s a defacto endorsement of the other

            Talkies really need to get with the program.

            It’s a two party system. I’d love it if there was a magical third option but that’s not how the electoral college works

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well, you see, if there are two candidates, and you say “don’t vote for that one” it’s a defacto endorsement of the other.

            Whataboutism. Two things can be true at once.

            • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Whataboutism would be saying “what Biden does is excusable because Trump does it too”.

              So no, it’s not whataboutism.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                Are you fucking kidding me? That’s literally the exact thing that you’re saying.

                Them: Here are Biden’s stances, and I consider them inexcusable"

                You: Actually, they are excusable because lists a bunch of stuff Trump did

                If that’s not what you’re saying, then go ahead and explain how Biden’s actions are excusable, why supporting him is defensible, without doing a whataboutism by bringing up Trump doing the same thing. As the other commenter requested.

                I swear, whataboutism is just something y’all made up where the only rule is “I’m always right.” What a load of bull.

                • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Whataboutism would be if I said “Biden’s support for the Gaza genocide is acceptable because Trump rapes little girls”. What I actually said was “Biden’s warmongering is nowhere near as severe as Trump’s warmongering”.

                  And the difference matters, because the context was a tweet that says “If you vote for Biden, you will be at war, so you should vote for Trump”.

        • Wiz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, but in context that was the only alternative at the time. Right?

          Tearing down Biden benefitted Trump.

      • WoodScientist
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seriously. Would Biden have started wars? He certainly didn’t use the leverage he had to end the Gaza war. And he certainly wouldn’t have done anything to help home prices. If he felt Iran was close to a bomb, he certainly would have bombed Tehran. Him or Kamala. Hell, Kamala’s signature kitchen table policy was a bone-headed plan to offer a large tax credit to first-time home buyers. Except that would have done nothing except bid property prices even higher.

        These are objectively true facts. Yet, liberals often are just as prone to cults of personality as Republicans. The same sin of “my side can do no wrong” infects both parties.

          • WoodScientist
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            2 days ago

            What’s speculation? Biden oversaw brutal wars and a historic cost of living crisis. I’m not speculating; I’m citing documented history. Did you forget about Gaza and the inflation?

            Or are you just so blind that you assume any criticism of the Dear Leader on the left is an endorsement of the Dear Leader on the right?

            • TrickDacy
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Everything happening now and you’re still simping for trump while pretending to be some moral angel. You and your dozen .ml trolls who also love to do this are getting on everyone else’s last nerves.

              • Spectrism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Not liking one choice = liking the other one is peak .world trolling. Where did anyone here simp for Trump?

            • solidheron@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              the speculation that Biden would bomb Iran over hint of a bomb. also you really think i cant see through you. btw let me know if im too direct 😆

        • Alexstarfire
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          And he certainly wouldn’t have done anything to help home prices. If he felt Iran was close to a bomb, he certainly would have bombed Tehran. Him or Kamala. Hell, Kamala’s signature kitchen table policy was a bone-headed plan to offer a large tax credit to first-time home buyers. Except that would have done nothing except bid property prices even higher.

          None of these are “objectively true facts.” This is speculation.

          Maybe Kamala’s house buying plan would have driven up prices a bit. But unless it somehow drove up the costs of all houses by the amount of “free” money, then it still would have been effective for its purpose; getting a house for a first time buyer. You don’t need the same type of help when switching houses.

          The only true fact you have is about Israel.

        • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Liberals piss me off more because I feel like they should know better. They certainly act like they do.