• 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      military bad, draft bad.

      but, yhea, gender discrimination is also bad. not sure if finding roles for them in the system is progress.

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 days ago

      Draft tends to apply to men only, so they probably can’t conscript them, even if they want to.

      Here in Germany, men can get drafted, even during peace time, while women can only be required to work in healthcare during a war.

  • ceenote
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    17 days ago

    Hey, you can’t be sure these girls aren’t also there to visit their boyfriends in the army.

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    17 days ago

    In Greece they check that you have 2 balls. You can’t serve if you have one only.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    … So Thailand actually has significantly better trans rights than the US does.

    Because currently, in the US, trans people do not legally exist.

        • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          I mean it’s a bit more complex obviously, e. g. it’s highly medicalized, you need a “gender identity disorder” diagnosis to legally transition and GAS in order to change your legal gender, but on the other hand HRT and GAS are state subsidized among other rights and protections specific to trans people.

          see here for more https://outrightinternational.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/OutRightTransReport.pdf

          • cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Your source is a decade old. The situation has deteriorated in practice after the 2022 protests, with the regime seeing trans people as connecting with the broader Western lgbtq+ movement and so “importing harmful ideas”. Source from last year: https://uprdoc.ohchr.org/uprweb/downloadfile.aspx?filename=13540&file=EnglishTranslation

            In general, it’s not that Iran recognizes “trans people”. There is no (officially allowed) trans identity. Medical and surgical transition is allowed as a way to “smooth a flaw” and assimilate into cishet-normative society. It is often applied as a way of state-sponsored conversion therapy: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/10/world/middleeast/iran-transgender-surgery.html

            • I’m sorry what exactly has changed since then, on a systemic level?

              Yeah the US trying to pinkwash their war efforts has certainly made the situation for LGBTQ people more difficult, but that’s not a phenomenon unique to Iran. It’s the same in Russia, large parts of Africa, West asia and I think latin america as well. If the nation hostile to you (like e.g. bombing schools while they’re in session) is also loudly proclaiming they want more gay rights, the knee-jerk reaction is that this must be a hostile act aimed at dismantling your society as well. That’s one of the ways how capitalists divide society into different identities and pit them against eachother.

    • BigDiction
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 days ago

      They are recognized by DoD policy and can opt out, but they also cannot opt in.

    • captainlezbian
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 days ago

      It’s complicated. Thailand has a continuous culture of recognizing gender non conformance (in part due to having never been colonized).

      It’s not amazing, and a lot of transfeminized people in Thailand are pushed into sex work, as well as facing some social stigmas. But from everything I’ve heard it’s a lot better than a lot of the world

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      17 days ago

      To be honest, if a country is gonna implement a draft or some form of compulsory service requirement, it should be gender neutral, and apply to their citizens universally, with no bearing on gender identity. By all means keep the physical fitness standards to ensure force effectiveness, but possession of one or another particular combinations of genitalia should not play into the equation at all.

  • the_riviera_kid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Could you just show up in a dress and say your trans or do they make some attempt to verify?

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    It took me 15 seconds to read that explanation and I understand it fully without ever even going there. Terrible answer to the posted question.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think the assumption is that there is an unspoken “unless it was explained to them”

      otherwise that would be the case for like pretty much all answers

  • radamant
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    The post is incorrect to begin with. I don’t know the source of the photo, but in Thailand, the service is based on a lottery for men. You may easily never roll it. There are many thai students (girls too) that do military training during their high school years on some days and don’t have to serve later. Also, this transitioning strategy will work in most countries in the world as most of them don’t allow transwomen.

    • RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      *won’t work But yes, even in “developed” countries it’s a whole process and they might still force you to serve. (I wouldn’t have been able to doge it since I’m too old to transition or whatever, but depression saved me)

    • Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      16 days ago

      “Trans women” should be written separately, as “trans” is an adjective.

      “transwomen” and “transmen”, on the other hand, are common dog whistles used by science denires to imply trans people are in a category of their own.

      • radamant
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’ve been a trans rights supporter my whole life. Trans rights = humans rights. But now I’m being accused of using dog whistles because I don’t follow the latest terminally online trends from extwitter/bsky on how to properly phrase things? You need to pick better battles, my man,

        • Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Trans is an adjective, so it’s simply incorrect to ever write trans women without a space. TER"F"s have been using “transwomen” as a dogwhistle for over a decade, it’s not some new speak.

          • radamant
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            This is such of a niche of a niche of a niche of a niche of a problem, I can’t even. All this language debate stuff was fine in 2015 when things were good. Now it’s 2026 and we’re having the absolute worst people running every country it seems. We have to focus on big things like right to repair, right to privacy, right to your data. Not debating a usage of a single space “trans” and “woman”

            • Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              In 2015 when things were good? Ok, sure? Anyways, I’m not debating anything. I told you two facts, if you want to ignore them then you do you.

    • Fribbizz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Only if there are ways out for the elite. Otherwise it’s essentially a defense co-op. If you believe your country is using the military in ethically wrong ways, that’s the actual problem, not the draft.

    • FukOui@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      It has merits in some cases. (Eg living beside a hostile country like N Korea)

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      It can be a good thing.

      While Canada doesn’t have it, most of our military usage is disaster relief and it comes with free education.

      I wouldn’t mind everyone having to help in shelters, evacuate people, or fill sand bags in exchange for free education.

  • 666dollarfootlong
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 days ago

    Those drafted can also pay to not go to the military. My girlfriend’s brother who is now living abroad paid i think ~200€ to not have to go there

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 days ago

          Understandable. Still a good deal, though.

          In my country, there is no official paid leave from draft, but using legal loopholes to avoid it will cost you many, many salaries over.

  • hOrni
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    If this was the only way to avoid the draft, I would become trans sooooo fast.

    • captainlezbian
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      Enlisting in the military has always been an effective means of getting laid from what I hear

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        I hear it’s more effective to marry someone in the military. You get a ton of action while they’re deployed.

  • Bruhh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 days ago

    Is this because trans peeps are not allowed in the military or because women cannot enlist?

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 days ago

      Women can enlist but not be chosen in the draft lottery.

      Thailand recognizes trans women as men but can be excused for medical reasons if they have undergone gender reassignment surgery.

      Previously the exemption was recognized as mental illness.