• @havokdj
    link
    841 year ago

    Imagine imprisoning the people who are responsible for bringing new, functional adults to our society for the inane crime of teaching.

    • @Stovetop
      link
      331 year ago

      The scary part about it is, they probably don’t believe that is what they’re doing at all. I’d wager almost all of the people getting behind this are people who believe that the responsibility of bringing new, functional adults to society is the sole purview of the church.

    • @Chunk
      link
      261 year ago

      Who better to arrest? The Republicans want to infect the minds of the kids and purging/silencing the teachers who don’t comply makes sense.

      • @havokdj
        link
        31 year ago

        I wouldn’t necessarily say third world, as that would imply the rich would be losing money as well, but I understand what you mean.

        Although that being said, the richest people on the planet tend to be complete fucking imbeciles themselves (Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Tim Cook, etc.)

        • @Maggoty
          link
          11 year ago

          Third world countries have some ridiculously rich people.

    • @Nobody
      link
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We should demand a refund of $15 million from Spain and give them Florida back in return. Honestly, it would be worth $15 billion.

    • Blue and Orange
      link
      fedilink
      -221 year ago

      Lots of tourists from here in the UK would be very upset at Disneyland sinking :(

      • @Shialac
        link
        211 year ago

        Disneyland Paris is way closer to the UK

        • @VinnieFarsheds
          link
          21 year ago

          But then you have to interact with the French 😭

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            From every experience I ha e had with the French, it has always been very pleasant. Rudest people I have met are the Chinese, British and American tourists.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I really don’t like the “haha France 🤢” memeage.

              It just seems like holdover from the Iraq invasion when they were, you know, right.

              • @TheActualDevil
                link
                31 year ago

                It’s definitely older than that. I remember French jokes going back decades before. They’ve always been a punching bag in America’s eyes. “The French are smelly.” “The French are snobby.” “The French are cowards.” If I had to guess, it probably goes back to WWII and their occupation by the Nazis.

      • cerothem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        If Disney world sank it would just be Bioshock.

        • @SoleInvictus
          link
          51 year ago

          I’m just loving the AI’s attempts at written language. It’s getting better but it’s still not close.

          • @TheActualDevil
            link
            21 year ago

            And it’s so lazy. You could get .pngs of all of that stuff and just stack them up in PS and throw on a sepia filter and it would look better after 5 minutes of work. AIs like this have just made people lazy. I’ve seen people talk about using Chat GPT to do Algebra 1 math. Literally any basic search engine will be just as effective and you might actually learn something but people are so determined to make AI something they can rely on. /rant

            • @SoleInvictus
              link
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I completely agree. My employer has been encouraging the use of chat GPT as a starting point for client deliverables. Since it literally makes things up, you still have to spend time verifying everything, which takes as long or longer than just doing everything yourself, plus you’ll have familiarity for that topic in the future.

  • @nnullzz
    link
    341 year ago

    Was not expecting that 2nd paragraph.

    • @givesomefucksM
      link
      English
      -52
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are no paragraphs…

      It’s a screenshot with a headline, subheading, a picture, and a picture description…

      Or did you find the article OP should have linked instead of this stupid screenshot?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        331 year ago

        There is being pedantic, and then there is being a bloody cunt.

        Guess which camp you belong to…

        • @givesomefucksM
          link
          English
          -211 year ago

          Geez, imagine what you would have thought of me if I immediately jumped to personal insults…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The same as I do now probably.
            I don’t give people credit for being rude just because they avoid foul language.

            Let me rephrase my previous point: you were being a bloody cunt. Maybe you’re a great lad normally, but both your replies to the other guy were cunty.

            Try to be nicer to people. This is probably not the first time in your life a stranger has reacted to your behaviour.
            Do better.

            • @givesomefucksM
              link
              English
              -161 year ago

              I don’t give people credit for being rude

              mate, I asked if they found the article OP should have linked instead of just a screenshot they saw on Reddit…

              Because that’s the only way they could have seen a sentence let alone a paragraph.

              If you think that’s rude enough to warrant personal insults, by all means just block me. I’m not getting into an internet slapfight over this, find someone else if that’s what you’re after

                • Promethiel
                  link
                  51 year ago

                  I like your jib. If you ever see me being a right cunt, call me out. And I hope you have people around to call you a cunt when needed too. We need more of you, truly.

          • @Cruxifux
            link
            41 year ago

            Man there’s not much that annoys me more than someone being an asshole, and then being upset when people are assholes back to them.

      • @nnullzz
        link
        211 year ago

        … you are absolutely right. How dumb of me to call the picture description a paragraph.

        • @givesomefucksM
          link
          English
          -251 year ago

          I mean, I was trying to be nicer than that…

          But yeah.

          While we’re at it, if you’re American and didn’t know this was a thing…

          At least you learned it today, because this is what Republicans talk about when they want to “return to the good ole days”. They want to make disagreeing with them illegal, even if it’s science that disagrees with them.

      • Spzi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        It most probably refers to the text starting with “John” and ending with “(1925)”.

  • ColorcodedResistor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    could you imagine having so much time on your hands that you debase the entire intellectual potential of your tribe, town, city, what have you, just by being a self righteous prick about pieces of paper with words printed on them?

    i was just in another thread. and for some reason. people take HUGE offense to being knowledgeable. like if you try to climb out of the ignorant bucket but you almost can’t because the other crabs pull us back down.

    you could rape a mans wife, flay his children before his eyes and he wouldn’t lift a finger to object, but say you have a book? and this book teaches you stuff? oh, that’s greater than any sin imaginable (the best part is i didn’t mention what book, but id love to hear everyone’s ‘self righteous’ projections about which one)

    • @TheActualDevil
      link
      51 year ago

      I heard this guy talking about the right’s reaction to the pandemic say “This whole new idea of what’s liberty, and liberty for whom can kill. Especially when it replaces the idea of liberty as that which has to be shared in some kind of common good.”

      It’s obvious though that it’s not actually a new idea, but I think this cuts to the heart of it. It’s an inherently selfish mindset that is so prevalent on the right. They use the idea of “liberty” as a bludgeon to get what they want by redefining it. Freedom has stopped meaning a group concept and become purely a personal one. Their own wants are the most important thing in all cases. And I want to emphasize want. These aren’t beliefs. They are projecting their desires of the way they would prefer the world and calling them beliefs.

      It’s fairly universal, I think, but exemplified in American culture. I could go one about some of the “founding” ideas of the country that have had effects that last to today but I’m talking about freedom today. It was always a selfish idea here (bunch of business men didn’t want to pay taxes) and the end result is before us.

      People see a book that makes them uncomfortable - for whatever reason - and just want it removed, regardless of any wider ramifications. They get scared about their own impending doom when a pandemic hits so they seek to remove the fear by the most direct path. Actually solving it is hard, but removing the fear is quick, so they demand that everyone just stop being afraid and stop reminding them of the things they fear. It seems to be a pretty standard through-line for their ethos.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    Ok, so we’ve just never followed where the first amendment says there will be no national religion

    • sebinspace
      link
      111 year ago

      No, we’re too busy furiously masturbating to the second amendment. After all, that’s the only one that counts!

    • @Maggoty
      link
      11 year ago

      No you see it wasn’t religious because it didn’t require teaching anything else, just not teaching evolution. Also since some church folk support evolution and other church folk don’t it can’t be religious for that either.

      Seriously though, for anyone unfamiliar with Christian dogma, according to them humans were divinely made in God’s image. The state supreme court wasn’t even trying to be impartial.

  • Billegh
    link
    211 year ago

    I guess someone needs to open up a Readeasy…

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    Everything stays, right where you left it.

  • Spzi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -71 year ago

    The comment section confuses me. Is this picture just a reminder how things were in 1925? Or is teaching evolution now banned in Florida?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      361 year ago

      This is an event from the past which is being echoed in the present.

      It’s strange, I know… sometimes people look at the past to better assess how to handle the present or to better know what to expect from the future.

      • Spzi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Alright, thanks for the answer. I found the snarky addition pretty unecessary. What’s up with people here? So much hostility around.

        I tried to understand the image and asked for help. Got it, thanked. Where’s the need for downvotes or sarcasm in that?

        Maybe that is living “A Boring Dystopia”, but I think we can and should do better.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean at first glance I see a title for an article, a short description of the scope of the article and a picture from a past article that echoes the same concept.

          This article (I haven’t seen it linked) is likely about books being banned.

          What’s with the snarky replies? Well, you seem to be asking in bad faith and are being treated as such. I’m sorry if that’s in error. If you’re genuinely asking these questions it’s a safe assumption having it explained clearly might help you. If you can sense the “snark” you can certainly parse the topic of this article from the screenshot.

          • Spzi
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            you seem to be asking in bad faith and are being treated as such. I’m sorry if that’s in error.

            Yes, it was a genuine question. I hope this community isn’t always that way.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Don’t worry, I understood you had a question and wasn’t sure why you were downvoted. Seriously just don’t worry about the downvotes, it’s 2023 there’s going to be snark on the internet

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          I think it’s because you were mistaken for a concern troll, “just asking questions” but intended to not people down.

          From your first response, it wasn’t possible to tell if you genuinely wanted more information, or were gearing up for some bad faith arguments.

          • Spzi
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            I hate to put so much thought and disclaimers into simple questions but I understand where this is coming from. It’s alright.

  • JasSmith
    link
    fedilink
    -205
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Teachers were giving kids actual pornography. Sorry, as a parent, I have a right to demand my children not be taught how to give gay blowjobs with graphic illustrations. You went too far, and now you have to stop. Cry all you want. Most people are not okay with your degeneracy.

    Edit: one of the “children’s” books is called “Gender Queer,” and includes graphic illustrations of sex.

    • @NocturnalMorning
      link
      941 year ago

      Yeah, I’d like to see a source on that one. I find it hard to believe that all teachers were giving children child pornography and that’s what instigated this law.

      Doesn’t even pass the sniff test if you think about it for a few minutes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        641 year ago

        republicans have the right to be furious about things that aren’t happening, it’s in the Constitution

        • @Buffalox
          link
          441 year ago

          about things that aren’t happening,

          They have their own facts. I get your joke, but boy It’s so depressing how crazy Republicans have become.

          • UristMcHolland
            link
            161 year ago

            But but the litter boxes in schools all across the country?! We have to be furious! Right guys? These things are real and not just a complete fabrication, right?! Oh…

    • @SuddenlyBlowGreen
      link
      511 year ago

      Teachers were giving kids actual child pornography.

      You mean the bible?

    • Razputinsgirth
      link
      fedilink
      431 year ago

      Not for nothing but gay blow jobs are practically the same as straight ones and I don’t need a book to teach me that. Also heavy doubt that that is the case

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      401 year ago

      Prove your claim. What book? Where? Or are you just making this up or maybe repeating some bullshit some other moron said?

    • @OwlPaste
      link
      English
      361 year ago

      What an idiot gay blowjobs are the same as hetero blowjobs… also no source what so ever. I feel sorry for your children growing up with a cunt of a parent.

      • @WhollyGuacamole
        link
        181 year ago

        Former child of a cunt here. Estrangement is in their future.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      341 year ago

      if we’re randomly accusing people of being pedophiles without proof, I’d start with the guy bringing up CSAM unprovoked ya know

    • @MrClayman
      link
      321 year ago

      Yup, you got us! We definitely spend all day trying to get your kid to give gay blowjobs.

      I can’t even get these kids to wear deodorant without a parent complaining. You think we’re wasting our time teaching kids how to give a blowjob? Lmfao “You went too far.” Doing what? Did this even happen? Are you super duper sure? Did you check with the people you let think for you?

      Cry all you want, most people are not okay with your degeneracy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      301 year ago

      None of the books being banned are pornographic. Don’t fucking lie to advance your cause of genocide

    • @not_that_guy05
      link
      261 year ago

      Bible shows incest, death, and slavery but that’s ok to have in schools. 🙃

    • OhStopYellingAtMe
      link
      261 year ago

      Does every banned book teach kids how to give “gay blowjobs?” Lie all you want. Most people are not okay with your bullshit.

      • @Rognaut
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Hey! No imagination allowed! Cut that out.

    • @AdolfSchmitler
      link
      161 year ago

      Maybe next time try thinking a little more than not at all. What’s the name of the book? Oh you can’t tell me cuz there isnt one. You gobble up this political rhetoric without a second thought cuz thinking is hard.

    • @Apepollo11
      link
      141 year ago

      I respect that you’ve provided something to back your claim up, but have you actually seen the uncensored version yet?

      It’s not what you’re claiming - it’s about how someone born female has been fantasising what it would be like to have male genitals. The ‘gay blowjob’ is the character finally trying on a strap on - which is pretty obvious in both the text and uncensored image, and then deciding pretty immediately that the fantasy was much better than the reality.

      There is a reason that websites are censoring it when they show it, and it isn’t because they’re protecting you. It’s because a half truth is much more powerful than a all-out lie, and by censoring parts out, it allows the readers to fill in the blanks with something much worse. They’re deliberately trying to deceive you, to rile you up, and keep you coming back to them.

      • @uberkalden
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If there is a source, and I’d be shocked if there was, it’s a one off thing that should be dealt with as such. There was absolutely not plural “teachers” defiling our youth with porn in school. This whole thing is fear mongering to create an out group for conservatives to rally against

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yeah, I understand that. It’s the same with the whole kidnapping bs that’s being spouted across social media right now.

          • @uberkalden
            link
            11 year ago

            Lol, someone came through and down voted instead of actually providing a source.

            What is this kidnapping story?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              It’s not a story but a bunch of women who claim that someone tried to kidnap them in broad daylight in a busy parking lot. Or tried to grab their kids. It’s always “someone” and never an actual description of a person. All the details are extremely vague. “Oh there was a van following me to my car!” “This guy was following me and he was wearing glasses so I couldn’t see his face!” It’s always these middle class white women too, which human traffickers don’t go after. They’ll take pictures of random vehicles and come up with fake ass stories about how the vehicle was following them, acting weird, blah blah. Oh and they never call the police. They just write long ass posts on social media about what almost happened to them.

    • @givesomefucksM
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      I heard they’re all witches!!!11111eleven

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      That seems your source sound entirely made up to get a certain delight riled up. I’d you are a victim of this misinformation please do some deeper research. If you’re just a pusher of disinformation I’m really disappointed.