• @Dasnap
      link
      English
      671 year ago

      “We’ll just put the disabled passengers in the cargo hold. Problem solved.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        … I could fly with my dog then? (I’ve not traveled with her, because being alone in the cargo sounds like a torment I would not wish on anyone). But if I can be there, too, that’s a whole other scenario

    • @SzethFriendOfNimi
      link
      English
      521 year ago

      Not to mention safety requirements for rapidly escaping a plane in the event of an emergency

      • @Buddahriffic
        link
        English
        -141 year ago

        Though tbf, with planes how often do emergencies fall between the “it’s dangerous to stay here” and “you can get off the plane safely if you’re quick” thresholds? I’d think that due to their nature, most situations will either be “no rush” or “not much we can do about it now”. Things like emergency exits seem more like safety theatre than anything else IMO.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      291 year ago

      They only put them down the center with regular seats along the windows.

      First class, second class, cargo class.

      • @Railing5132
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        These will not see the light of day until the industry coughs up enough money to buy off enough legislation oversight to make the FAA egress rules “agreeable”.

    • squiblet
      link
      fedilink
      28
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imagine trying to evacuate in a rush. Also, deep vein thrombosis.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Dvt would likely be less of an issue with your legs out vs bent at the knee. Less gravity for your heart to fight against.

        • @dingus
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          DVT is an issue if you’re immobile for any decent length of time. Your position doesn’t really matter too much. That’s why they want you up and walking immediately as soon as possible after a surgery and why they will often put patients with an extended stay in the hospital on blood thinners.

        • squiblet
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          True, though it would be horrifically uncomfortable to be forced to sit like that for 4 hours without the ability to shift positions.

  • @cholesterol
    link
    English
    1011 year ago

    This seems incompatible with a pretty high proportion of Americans.

    • @TheDarkKnight
      link
      English
      381 year ago

      Y’all getting kinda thicc too, no offense.

      • @Cryophilia
        link
        English
        231 year ago

        It’s funny because you don’t know which country he’s from but it still applies anyway because everyone is getting fatter

    • @dingus
      link
      English
      211 year ago

      Relevant username

    • qyron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Tremendously incompatible, if 1/10 of what is portraid on movies is true.

  • The Giant Korean
    link
    English
    661 year ago

    Pretty soon they’re just going to roofie people and pack them into planes like sardines.

    • @Shanedino
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      Honestly it’s like teleporting then so I’m on board.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      They could just tip the nose of the plane 90 degrees in the air and then have a slide or funnel that dumps you into the fuselage. You’ll just want to be sure to buy first-class tickets so that you’ll be at the top of the pile.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      If you stack people alternating head-first, feet-first, head-first, they will tesselate much better. Airlines eventually won’t be able to resist the profit margin.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    I don’t absolutely hate it, but I’m 6’3", so fully stretching my legs out on a plane is always just a pipe dream.

    I’m sure they’d make them fit only average size people, unfortunately.

  • @macrocephalic
    link
    English
    491 year ago

    I think they should just have rows of bunk beds. It’s much easier to stack something flat than people with their awkward bends at the hips and knees.

  • @superfes
    link
    English
    461 year ago

    Window seat dude needs to take a piss, watch the fun …

    Also, why the fuck is she smiling?!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 year ago

      I think these only go down the center based on the photo.

      She’s smiling because she’s being paid to smile.

  • @spittingimage
    link
    English
    45
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One day they’ll invent super-economy class where you just get strapped to the wings and released over your destination. Parachutes will cost extra.

  • @PoetSII
    link
    English
    401 year ago

    I think whoever thought of this concept should die

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Eh. Fewer passengers per plane is worse for the environment, and lying down is great for people with back problems. I can see the pluses.

    • @garibaldi_biscuit
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      Where are the overhead baggage bins? No carry-on bags? If they go in the hold, how do you make it bigger?

    • @Revonult
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      This design is similar but not the same as OG post. Although still shitty, its quite an improvement over the orgional.

    • @Furbag
      link
      English
      -61 year ago

      The newer version from the link looks less bad than this picture, but still dystopian as fuck. We need to make airline travel cheaper somehow rather than having the airline industry come up with their own ideas to try and pack people in like cattle.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        Cheaper? What kinda crack are you smoking? Shit is destroying the planet, it needs to be a LOT more expensive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          what kind of crack are YOU smoking? So practically “banning” poor people for traveling anywhere further than 500km than their hometown is the solution? And allow rich people go on as usual?

          The not-wealthy will be the only ones affected by this. Business people were traveling since the birth of the aviation and will continue travelling. This will be just an increased cost in their cost planning.

          So if you’re rich you’re allowed to destroy the planet. If you’re poor stay at home, the planet is in danger.

        • @Furbag
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          Uh, you know, it is possible to care about two things at once. Wanting airline travel to be cheaper/more comfortable and also less environmentally unfriendly are not mutually exclusive positions.

          As others have pointed out, making it more expensive isn’t going to get rid of air travel, it’ll just be reserved for the ultra-wealthy who will not give a damn either way.

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          We could subsidize biofuels. Just spitballing.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I agree, but it’s mostly the Uber wealthy, not regular travelers. It’s bad, but it’s not that bad. Using a whole plane to carry one or two people is horrible though.

        • @HardlightCereal
          link
          English
          -61 year ago

          You get points for being an environmentalist but lose points for accusing any differing opinion of being the result of drug use. That cliche is often used on autistic people to attack them for thinking differently. You should try making your point without cliches.

            • @HardlightCereal
              link
              English
              -41 year ago

              Yeah, that’s usually how people use cliches. They hear something and think it sounds quippy in a rhetorical sense, even if it’s not what they mean. It’s a lazy way of participating in a conversation without actually putting forward any ideas of your own. It’s the death of sincerity.

              • @Cryophilia
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                What I’m reading is you just fail to understand anything that isn’t literal.

            • @HardlightCereal
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              I’m autistic and I’ve literally been harassed by people who used that cliche. If I were virtue signalling I’d obviously say something people want to hear. Do you think that I thought that saying this would gain me praise?

              • @Cryophilia
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                I’m autistic and I’ve literally been harassed

                +30 virtue signal points

                • @HardlightCereal
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  You think that admitting to having a autism or being honest about ableist experiences is something to look down on. You’re hateful towards autistic people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        This extra passenger density would make it cheaper per person, right? More fuel efficient, too.

        • @Furbag
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Looking over my original post, perhaps my phrasing wasn’t clear. Yes, this is one way to decrease costs, but it comes at the expense of comfort. Airline companies are no stranger to this process, and have been rolling out new methods of packing as many passengers onto a plane as physically possible since the very first commercial airplanes took flight.

          Awkward and regressive ideas like this, where the airlines are contemplating stacking people in uncomfortable looking double-decker seating to save precious inches of space are only coming out now because no significant strides have been made in making air travel less expensive to operate as a whole. It is always going to be easier to shave off a few inches of legroom and pack in another row of seating in the next generation of jet airliner than it is to invent a new type of jet fuel that is cheaper and burns cleaner without sacrificing performance, or developing a new more efficient fuselage that can fly just as far as a conventional plane while carrying less fuel, etc.

          It would be nice to see air travel improve for a change, rather than continue to get worse and worse over time out of necessity.

  • @Fedizen
    link
    English
    331 year ago

    imagine this plane crashing.

    • @dangblingus
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      Just like all plane crashes, everyone would die.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Not sure if you’re just joking, but plenty of people survive plane crashes. Most crashes aren’t just a plane falling out of the sky at full speed. Survival rates are around 95%.

        • @Mirshe
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Generally speaking, plane crashes are like train crashes. Either most everyone survives, or most everyone dies pretty quickly, with very little in between.

    • @nslatz
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      Imagine this plane with a fire on board before takeoff and now the unfit overweight masses have to evacuate.

    • jeebus
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Imagine a new meaning to the phrase “upper decker”.

  • janus2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    at that point just give me general anaesthesia and put me in an airline shipping coffin so at least i don’t have to be conscious for the horror show

    • @metallic_substance
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      12 hour flight. The fail-safes fail. Something goes wrong with the anesthesia and you’re awake for the entire thing

      • janus2
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I woke up in the middle of my wisdom teeth surgery so I of all people oughtta know better lol

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      I fly often for work, stay up the whole night before and cannabis. Flying is easy now.

  • kase
    link
    English
    311 year ago

    As someone who doesn’t have claustrophobia, I feel claustrophobic just looking at this. Then again, I’ve never been on a plane before, and for all I know this might be better :/

    • @vinyl
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      I had very bad claustrophobia the time I got rolled in a carpet with only my head sticking out or the time I got closed in a trunk. Flew around 12 times on airplanes and they are mostly just uncomfortable and annoying. Maybe I grew out of it 🤷

          • roguetrick
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Getting locked in a trunk and rolled up into a carpet with your head sticking out just sounds like someone Wile e coyote would count as normal life experiences. Bonus points if you hopped away off screen after getting rolled in the carpet.

            • Lemmington Bunnie
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I got rolled into our floor rug as a kid, we were messing around and I thought it would be funny. It was not and a panic attack was had.

      • @A_Random_Idiot
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        I think theres just so much shit going on in an airplane that the brain short circuits and doesnt think about the fact that you are in a disturbingly thin walled, air sealed aluminium can hurtling through the sky at 800+kph with a hundred other people, most of whom dont have the common sense the gods gave a common rock, and are riddled with disease that you are no doubt being exposed to due to being crammed in like sardines.

        • @vinyl
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I agree it sucks but most of the time I am just hoping that the plane doesn’t crash, and I am a pretty anxious person, other than that my headphones are in and I’m either listening to music or watching a something and looking out the window :p

    • @BlackVenom
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      The leg room is better but scooting into the window seat will be slightly harder. Hard telling if you can put your feet down in this set up though.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        The leg room is different, but it isn’t better. There’s about the same amount of usable space. I’d prefer the classic chair setup I think.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Just looks way too low clearance. Can’t put up your knees, can’t put one leg over the other, can’t lay on the side. Who can keep their legs straight like this for 10h. If it had like double the clearance I’d love this.

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Alternatively, have it totally flat under some chairs maybe? Have the option for a bed or a chair basically.