• @EvilEyedPanda
    link
    8110 months ago

    Don’t forget the government bailout when their gamble fails.

    • kpw
      link
      fedilink
      4410 months ago

      Only applies if you won enough already.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        English
        1510 months ago

        Get enough of the country on your payroll and you can just claim it’s bad for the economy if you go under.

        Taps head

  • darq
    link
    fedilink
    6210 months ago

    Except if you have enough money, it’s not even gambling anymore. The only way you’d lose is if everybody loses.

    And that’s completely ignoring the fact that enough money lets you influence the rules of the game to tilt the odds in your favour.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      And if you’re only slightly rich (as in, daddy’s a lawyer) you can afford to gamble, lose, and then try again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4210 months ago

    If you’re rich you can afford to gamble, lose and try again.

    If you’re poor, you can gamble, win, and then have to spend your winnings helping out your family and community. Like, paying for the operation your uncle needs but couldn’t afford, or helping mom’s friend from church avoid losing her home.

    This is a reason that a lot of poor-person owned businesses don’t grow. They may start strong, but then the business owner has trouble continuing to invest.

    • @kittenzrulz123
      link
      4810 months ago

      Most gamblers quit right before they become rich

    • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Not unless you do it outside a golden palace that abstracts your money into vouchers and chips.

      But generally wealthy people make more gambles in business, partnership, accountability, other people’s lives and social welfare, and the general stability of the world.

      Like say becoming an arms dealer then paying the cost of a F-150 economy package to a couple senators and having them spend their endless war chests with no audits or oversight on some missiles to kill some goat farmers or something.

      Or creating a pesticide with the upside of remaining active in soil for 4 or 5 centuries (and recycling in the human liver for up to a year after exposure) and having it produced in an impoverished southern town and then exported to French Polynesia so they can continue to grow cloned banana trees.

      Or like taking doctors on nice yacht lunches and golf trips and telling them yes you really have developed a non addictive opioid.

      • @Wogi
        link
        210 months ago

        I mean, depending on your definition of mass murderer, you can safely say yes.

    • @worldsayshi
      link
      110 months ago

      The serious answer is that you need to play positive sum games.

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I disagree. The serious answer is you have to be the one person that gets lucky.

        Take 1024 people each with $1000. They all play roulette and go all in every round, half on black half on red. After 10 rounds, 1023 people have lost all their money, and one has won a million dollars.

        The person who “made it” didn’t do anything different, or play a +EV game. He just got lucky.

        • PaintedSnail
          link
          410 months ago

          Roulette is not a positive sum game, though. If you keep playing, eventually you will lose everything to the house.

          A positive sum game is where repeated plays will average out to a net gain. The secret is having enough initial capital to keep you alive if your initial gambles don’t pan out. People living paycheck to paycheck don’t have that

          • enkers
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You’re correct, but you’re also being a bit pedantic and ignoring the point OP is trying to make. It still illustrates the point just fine at 47.4% instead of 50%. Odds of winning 10 in a row go from 1:1,024 to 1:1,746.

    • @Duralf
      link
      510 months ago

      It’s because they don’t put work on them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1410 months ago

    That gambling tower is defying the laws of physics and it will come crashing down.

    Just like gambling, I guess.

  • @ChickenLadyLovesLife
    link
    English
    910 months ago

    Hmm, this makes me want to play Lemmings again for some reason.

    • @Agent641
      link
      310 months ago

      Fuuuck that takes me back to the dos days. They dont make games like they used to (in pure assembly I mean)

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Some madlads still do. Retro City Rampage (which is already over 10 years old now, damn) was ported to the NES, so that’s some 6502 Assembly work there.

  • @MeanEYE
    link
    610 months ago

    Image is actually cut off. What’s missing is below each person there’s a swimming pool. For poor people it’s filled with water, for successful it’s filled with money.

  • SharkAttak
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    To be realistic, shouldn’t the stair be made of first panel’s WORK piles?

  • @Jackcooper
    link
    210 months ago

    Who is this guy I’ve now seen in two gambling memes

  • @Mr_Blott
    link
    110 months ago

    Wee lambs -

    Gambol gambol gambol