• @AnalogyAddict
    link
    -205 months ago

    That’s not bold. Just a limited vocabulary.

    • @trollbearpig
      link
      17
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m so sick of people like you. “Oh, they may be right but they were a bit rude. So I’m going to pretend that they are wrong”. Go fuck yourself if you have nothing useful to contribute. This is just a tactic trolls use in the internet to distract people, and people keep falling for it.

      Plus if you actually read the article you would know that they are referencing an academic definition of bullshit. So go fuck yourself twice, you didn’t even bother to read before declaring your incredible moral superiority. You are just a clown.

      • @AnalogyAddict
        link
        -10
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Let me say this slowly for you, so you can maybe understand. I wasn’t criticizing the point in the original article. I was criticizing the OP who said it was “bold.”

        Now, run along and argue with someone more your speed. Try 5th graders.

    • El Barto
      link
      105 months ago

      Your comment is a sign of limited vocabulary, because you pretty much used words that everyone uses.

      (See how your argument holds no water?)

      • @AnalogyAddict
        link
        -125 months ago

        I wasn’t trying to be an academic edgelord.

        You have no valid point. You’re trying to discredit my point by pointlessly picking on my choice of words. I was discrediting the categorizing of the method used to make it.

        • El Barto
          link
          8
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I wasn’t trying to be an academic edgelord.

          Followed by:

          You have no valid point. [etc]

          Sure.