• @NegativeInf
    link
    1731 month ago

    This is the intent of the law, not some accidental consequence.

    First, make government appear non-functional.

    Second, protect child rapists.

    Fuck republicans, conservatives, fascists and all their ilk.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    711 month ago

    What is even the argument for denying a child medical care?

    Yes, we all know this is insane and stupid, but for the sake of trying to understand, what is the best argument in favour of this?

    • @Soggy
      link
      511 month ago

      Children are the sole property of their parents and no gubmint is gonna tell me how to raise my kids.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      381 month ago

      If a child is trans or wants an abortion, conservatives want the parents to be able to stop that and make the child suffer

    • @primrosepathspeedrun
      link
      281 month ago

      well, you see, trans people exist, so you must always have the right to rape your children and lock them in the basement and force them into cults.

      • FauxPseudo
        link
        81 month ago

        Always? No exceptions? Like what if you feel guilty?

        • @primrosepathspeedrun
          link
          3
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          supply side jesus will sunder the weak!

          do you still feel guilty now, coward?

          now get back in that (child’s bed)room, crusader! rape for the rape god?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      231 month ago

      “I feed and clothe and give shelter to my child. I alone get to decide what’s right for them, including education and healthcare.”

      Thats how it usually goes. They don’t treat their children like human beings with their own will, but as property. Authoritarianism begins at home.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        Ya, that unfortunately sounds like it, and they fail to take into account that if there is an emergency their child can’t be treated. That’s the sort of thing that happens to other people and wouldn’t the Libs just love it if that happened…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      “How dare you go near my child’s genitals. The only people who want to that are pedophiles and gynecologists, and that’s bad!”

  • don
    link
    fedilink
    531 month ago

    The Gross Old Pedophiles party hard at work being gross, old pedophiles. What a surprise!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    501 month ago

    I’m a Republican and even though I’m NOT Pro Rape I’m VERY PRO THIS LAW that allows Parents to RAPE their Children! It’s MUCH better then Drag Queens existing!

    • ✺roguetrick✺
      link
      231 month ago

      I’m Commander Shepard and Idaho is my favorite state on the citadel.

  • @riodoro1
    link
    English
    411 month ago

    But according to their faith it’s impossible that a parent rapes their kid.

    But if he did it’s probably his right or something

  • @jacksilver
    link
    381 month ago

    What about other emergencies, like a kid breaks a bone at school/etc.? Would you not be able to help the kid?

    • @primrosepathspeedrun
      link
      101 month ago

      kid might get trans’d if you splint their broken toe wrong.

      shit, look, im already using they/them pronouns for this kid, and they’re still hypothetical! protect the children!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As a non American the only thing i knew about Idaho is this bit from Simpsons.

    Now i know 2 things i guess.

  • @Sunroc
    link
    261 month ago

    Wow Idaho is pro cover ups for child rape? Half the country is fine with that!

  • qevlarr
    link
    15
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    While generally the phrase “the cruelty is the point” is a great way to show how Republican ideas hurt society, I don’t think it applies here. The law is meant to hurt trans people, or children who are sexually active, not kids who were raped by their parents.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 month ago

      But it also fully follows from the conservative view of parenting - that a child is the property of their parents - that a child who is victimized by said parents should have no legal recourse.

    • @LANIK2000
      link
      181 month ago

      Being bared from healthcare is a god damn human rights violation in any context. If it somehow explicity prohibited specifically the things they think are wrong, sure, it’s still shit, but sure. But like this, they are quite literally stating that children don’t have the right for healthcare, it’s a privilege the parent must grant. It’s beyond fucked! The parent can legally kill their child now, as long as nobody bothers to file a proper neglect case.

      Comparing republicans to nazis is an insult to nazis; they at least actually had their fucked up family values. Republicans just want everyone to suffer more than them.

    • @Railing5132
      link
      41 month ago

      This is Idaho. I bet dollars to donuts there are a bunch of LDS members that are quite happy with this situation.

    • @alphanerd4OP
      link
      4
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Def meant to put a point on … exactly how would you actually be able to tell where that line of intentionality is? and more to point, … does it matter, really, a system is what it does and intention is irrelevant. They meant to do something

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      01 month ago

      not kids who were raped by their parents

      Depends on which kids and which parents. OP’s post has strong Chinatown energy.

  • @Agent641
    link
    121 month ago

    Isn’t there a whole UN rights of the child thing?

    • @Agrivar
      link
      301 month ago

      The U.S.A. - as a rule - doesn’t ratify anything the U.N. declares. We don’t even cooperate with the ICC. Special little (fucking) snowflakes we are.

      • SkaveRat
        link
        fedilink
        191 month ago

        I love the “we will invade the Netherlands if any US official is tried for was crimes in The Hague” clause/rule

        • azuth
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Do keep in mind that it is all empty posturing as the law actually excepts US allies from almost every “measure”.

          Just typical yankee chest beating.

      • @Agent641
        link
        31 month ago

        Geez these USA people sound exceptional. Manifesting their own, whats the word, everyone else’s destiny.

    • @primrosepathspeedrun
      link
      21 month ago

      lol, sure, but can you think of any other shit the UN says that nobody fucking cares about? anything at all?

  • @RBWells
    link
    111 month ago

    Even here in FL, kids over 12 have some degree of medical privacy. The county STD clinic will treat without informing parents, you cannot access health information online (which leads to a really weird few years when I can’t because they are 13 but they can’t, because they aren’t 18).

    And emergency services are different as well, there is no way a parent would be able to block a law enforcement action either.

    This law is bad, any kid who can’t trust their parents is harmed by it, but I don’t think it would do what the meme is implying. If someone is raped, that is a criminal offense not just a health event. If medics are asking they ought not be. Criminal evidence isn’t healthcare.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      Even here in FL

      Goddamn, you know things are bad when kids in Florida have more rights…fuckin hell…

    • @SacralPlexus
      link
      11 month ago

      If medics are asking they ought not be.

      Well that is just a horrifying assertion.

      • @RBWells
        link
        21 month ago

        They need to be calling the police, not deferring to the parent.