• Fat Tony
    link
    25
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Me who never stirs and never gets sticky pasta…

  • AItoothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    174 hours ago

    I have actually never seen this before. Other comments are saying its because you dont salt your water and i do so probably thats why. It also makes the taste better so overall recommended.

    • toofpic
      link
      03 hours ago

      You can add some oil so pasta won’t also stick when you have cold leftovers. I add both oil and salt in the very beginning, because there’s no reason to not do that, and I have a feeling of the right amount compared to the amount of water.
      And I stir once, about a minute after putting the pasta in, because something tends to stick to the bottom in the very beginning. Afterwards, it’s just not necessary.

      • @HairyHarry
        link
        53 hours ago

        I add both oil and salt in the very beginning, because there’s no reason to not do that.

        If you really like to impregnate your pasta, so that it won’t absorb your sauce (or less well), then you are right about the there-is-no-reason-part in your answer.

  • @yggdar
    link
    447 hours ago

    Do you cook your pasta in a large pot, with plenty of boiling water, and a good amount of salt? Usually I just stir once just after putting the pasta in, and I never have noodles sticking together.

    • @HairyHarry
      link
      6
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It depends on the pasta (form, freshness, self-made… etc). Some has to be steered 3-4 times others just once, in my experience.

    • Redjard
      link
      fedilink
      24 hours ago

      My pot would have to be 3x its size to fit the amount of water a single package of pasta says I should use.
      1kg to 10l
      Do you have a bathtub in your stove?

      • @yggdar
        link
        230 minutes ago

        As others have already said, that is a lot of pasta. If you regularly cook volumes like that, it would really make sense to invest in a large pot as well. A cheap 10l pot will do just fine for boiling pasta, and it sounds like you would get plenty of use out of it.

      • @jaybone
        link
        52 hours ago

        Only the best musicians blame their pot.

      • @ByteJunk
        link
        194 hours ago

        No, but 1kg of pasta? Are you feeding a battalion?

      • @f314
        link
        54 hours ago

        1 kg of dry pasta is enough for 10 people! Do you often cook for that many people? (Genuine question)

      • Skua
        link
        fedilink
        34 hours ago

        I do have a 10 L pot, I use it for making stock and beer

  • Aielman15
    link
    326 hours ago

    Is this a meme I’m too Italian to understand?

  • @Squorlple
    link
    English
    348 hours ago

    My biggest gripe with cooking instructions is the non-specificity. “Stir pasta frequently”? How frequently? How continuously? Tell me in unit Hertz

    • @jettrscga
      link
      237 hours ago

      I won’t accept my pasta at anything lower than 120Hz.

      • @Shard
        link
        127 hours ago

        Not sure your pasta will survive that kind of speeds…

      • ɐɥO
        link
        fedilink
        36 hours ago

        only 120hz?! I refuse to eat any pasta below 2.4ghz

        • synae[he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 hours ago

          Just imagine the chaos when you run the microwave at the same time!

      • @prembil
        link
        17 hours ago

        The human eye cannot see more than 24Hz, so why bother

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 hours ago

          No it can see much more. Bonus: your brain can ‘see’ more than 100hz too. Google bundesen tva. Source i worked on programs to measure it for my gfs phd. Also i play fps :D

        • @jettrscga
          link
          2
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I don’t understand the basis of the 24Hz limit rumor. My monitors are 144Hz, and if I limit them to 60Hz and move my mouse around I see fewer residual mouse cursors “after-images” than I do at 144Hz. That’s a simplified test that shows that the eye can perceive motion artifacts beyond 60Hz.

          The eye can perceive LEDs that are rectified at 60Hz AC, it’s very annoying.

          • @PunchingWood
            link
            3
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I could never tell if people who were claiming not seeing more than the 24 Hz/FPS thing were serious or just excusing poor game optimization. They were either fanboys defending a poor job of a product, or simply had terrible eyes. But I think even with the latter you’d still be able to tell the difference in smoothness.

            It’s one of those things that once you experience a higher framerate in games it’s very hard to go back to a lower setting.

            I find it hard to get used to in movies/shows though. My TV has an option to insert frames for smoother playback to make it appear a higher Hz, but it often looks unnatural. It was hard getting used to The Hobbit movie (I think it was Desolation of Smaug) that was in 48 FPS. And Avatar: Way of Water was constantly switching between lower and higher frames for regular and action scenes, it was such a jarring experience.

            • @CheeseNoodle
              link
              English
              25 hours ago

              iirc 24hz is just the minnimum thta the movie industry found creates the illusion of a moving image.

          • @SkunkWorkz
            link
            1
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            24hz is the lower limit. People will perceive 24hz as a smooth sequence, especially with motion blur, while anything below it will start to look choppy. Of course humans can perceive higher frequencies. But 24hz became the standard because celluloid film is expensive especially in the early days of cinema. The less frames you need to shoot the less film you need to buy and develop. And film back then was probably not sensitive enough for the lower exposure times that come with higher frame rates.

          • Hjalmar
            link
            fedilink
            26 hours ago

            I think it’s the limit for what most people can see as jittery motion. You may be able to differentiate between higher FPS settings, but above 24 hertz most people shouldn’t be able to see discrete steps.

            That’s at least how I’ve come to understand it

  • @niktemadur
    link
    34 hours ago

    137 times more powerful than the Electromagnetism you try and use to tear them apart, behold the Strong Pasta Friendship Force!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    227 hours ago

    Y’all need to salt your water.

    It prevents nearly all the sticking and it makes pasta delicious

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 hours ago

      It’s not the salt that prevents the sticking. You use a larger pot with plenty of water. Still delicious though :P

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 hours ago

      And while you’re at it, shell out the extra 50 cents or whatever for the bronze cut pasta. It has a much nicer texture and allegedly makes sauce adhere to the pasta more.

  • @TankovayaDiviziya
    link
    14 hours ago

    Do you not put just a little oil to make them unstick with each other?

    • @Noite_Etion
      link
      11
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Nah that is another myth, it will just make it harder for your sauce to stick to your pasta. Add salt and it won’t stick together.

  • @Iheartcheese
    link
    37 hours ago

    It’s that goblin fuck from sin city having an orgy.