• 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2224 months ago

    “Ultimately it increases entropy… let me tell you about the heat death of the universe…”

    “No, Mom! I’m still afraid of the False Vacuum monster laying underneath my ground state!”

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      62
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If those were likely to happen during our lifetime then they would have already. Now prion disease…

      Good night!

    • @SzethFriendOfNimi
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      🎼
      Elect-ro-weak and Higgs field
      Staying in a false staaaate
      Tun-nel, tun-nel, it alllll falls dowwwwwn

      Then there are no mass-es
      And, more, no inter-act-ions
      Mass-less, mass-less, no a-toms nowwww

      • @toynbee
        link
        English
        134 months ago

        I listened to this in my head, where did it go?

        • Miles O'Brien
          link
          fedilink
          English
          94 months ago

          A̷̙͂̀̐̾̋̌̒̉̀̿̃͘̚L̴̡̬͓̩͕̭̱̻̹͚̦͉̱͉̪̾͑̾̈͘Ļ̸̢̛̤̯̦͇͉̭̱͚̜̰́̂́̃͐͛́͗͊̾́͗̑̏̄͘͜ ̷̢͈̏̈́̀̈́̀̀̆B̶̢̡͙͉̖̰͓̯͎͉̣͇͆̅̄͛̅̈̌̉̑͘͝Ę̴̨̖̜̺̮̟̻̱̬̮͉̯͕͇̰̺͌̐̓̐̍̇̆̄̔Ĉ̸̢̢̡̧̛͉̩̭̭͇̞͇͇̲͙̺̱͆̑̊͊̌͑̚̚͘͝͠ͅÖ̷̢̫̐͌M̵̨̼͚̝̝̳̿̏̈́̈́̐̽͘͝ͅE̵̡̼̖̺̩̪̥͖̣̻̺̎͌̾̈̈̂͆͒̕S̸̼̒͛̈ ̶̠͙̦̰͕̻̪͕̟̻̮̹̰͎̣̅̊̀̌̋̐̀̏̽̎̇͑̄͘͘͠T̴̨̤̲͉̟̞̙̫͉͂͆̔͊͛͌̍̈͊̈́̈́̽̕͜ͅH̵̱̬̭͖̙̜̲̘͔̬͆͊̈̏ͅĘ̵̧̳̮̤͖̫̪͍̦͖̖̯̥͈̦̈́̈́͋͐͆̒̆̈́͊̾͘̕͠ ̵̖̜̫͇͙͐̿̃́͊͑̀́̈́̀̉͋͌͒̓͝V̴̡̭̺̻͊͑̿́͒O̸̡͕̫̦̞̫̘͈̻͎̳̊Ḯ̷̖̥̫͖͉̖̜͚͕̹̣̙͚̯̯́̊̉̄́͛͑͌̃̄́̓̈͜͜D̵̨̢̛̳̻͓̘͙̞͍̠̺͖͓̟̳͌̊͋̿̀͑̈́̏̆̀̒̒̈̄̇́

    • @InputZero
      link
      English
      84 months ago

      So scientists are not entirely certain about the heat death of the universe. The heat death is the most reasonable prediction given what we know but there could be a force acting across the universe that may very slowly reverse the expansion of the universe that we have yet to discover and cause a big crunch over a ridiculously large amount of time. The fact is predictions that far in the future aren’t really very useful.

        • @InputZero
          link
          English
          34 months ago

          I don’t know enough to answer that, sorry.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I asked chatgpt and the answer is inconclusive

            Does quantum foam occasionally spawn a new big bang ?

            The idea of “quantum foam” occasionally spawning a new Big Bang is an intriguing concept, but it belongs more to speculative physics than established science, at least with our current understanding of cosmology. Quantum Foam:

            Quantum foam (or spacetime foam) refers to a concept derived from quantum mechanics and general relativity. It was first proposed by physicist John Wheeler in the 1950s. The basic idea is that on extremely small scales, close to the Planck length (~1.6 × 10⁻³⁵ meters), spacetime is not smooth but fluctuates wildly due to quantum uncertainty. This is because, in quantum theory, at these incredibly small scales, particles and even spacetime itself undergo constant, random fluctuations, resulting in a “foamy” structure. Quantum Foam and Big Bangs:

            The speculation that quantum foam might give rise to new universes or Big Bang-like events is tied to broader ideas in theoretical physics, including concepts like quantum cosmology, eternal inflation, and multiverse theories.

            Quantum Fluctuations and Universe Creation: In some models of the universe, it is proposed that quantum fluctuations could give rise to entire universes. This is somewhat similar to how quantum fluctuations in energy can spontaneously create particles for brief moments (due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle). Some cosmologists have extended this thinking, suggesting that a fluctuation in the quantum foam could create a new region of spacetime that expands and becomes a new universe—a new Big Bang, in essence. This is related to the idea of the multiverse, where new universes are constantly being generated through different mechanisms, including quantum fluctuations.

            Eternal Inflation: Another theory that links the idea of new Big Bangs with quantum processes is the theory of eternal inflation, which proposes that our universe is just one “bubble” in a larger multiverse. In this model, the universe experiences a rapid expansion (inflation) in its early stages, and in some regions, this inflation never stops. Small regions of spacetime can “bubble off” from this eternally inflating space and form new universes with their own Big Bang events.

            Cyclic or Bounce Models: There are also cyclic models of the universe (such as the ekpyrotic universe or conformal cyclic cosmology) where a universe goes through repeated cycles of expansion and contraction. In these models, the quantum foam might play a role in transitioning from one cycle to the next, though these are still speculative ideas.

            Does Quantum Foam Directly Spawn Big Bangs?

            Currently, the connection between quantum foam and the creation of new Big Bangs remains speculative and unproven. Our understanding of quantum gravity—the theory that would fully unify quantum mechanics and general relativity—is still incomplete. Many of the ideas related to the quantum foam, multiverses, or eternal inflation remain theoretical and lack direct empirical evidence.

            While quantum foam might offer an intriguing arena for considering the birth of new universes, there is no definitive evidence that quantum foam occasionally spawns new Big Bangs, at least according to current mainstream physics. In Summary:

            Quantum foam describes the hypothetical, fluctuating nature of spacetime on extremely small scales. Some speculative theories in physics suggest that quantum foam or related processes could, in principle, give rise to new universes (possibly via quantum fluctuations or other mechanisms). These ideas are part of multiverse theories or eternal inflation models but remain speculative and are not established as fact. The idea of quantum foam spawning Big Bangs is fascinating but is still in the realm of theoretical and speculative physics.

            Scientific advancement, especially in quantum gravity and cosmology, might eventually give us more insights into whether such processes could occur.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        I read a SciFi book where there was a group in the world that does general science in the name of averting the heat death of the universe.

        • @Lycist
          link
          English
          14 months ago

          Ah yes, the ol’ “If a tree falls in the woods does it make a sound?” approach to preventing the death of the universe.

            • @Lycist
              link
              English
              14 months ago

              Existence is in the eye of the beholder. For something to exist it must be observed.

              It sounds like in the book you read performing general science would go towards observing the universe preventing its heat death?

              I dunno if fully applicable, but that’s what I got out of it :D

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yes, this answer, the kid fucked around (asked questions), now it’s time to find out.

      • aname
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Well, heat just spread over a larger area but it doesn’t get destroyer nor turn into any other form of energy.

        But it doesn’t die per se.

        • @finitebanjo
          link
          English
          84 months ago

          If you consider particle excitement to be the definition of heat and subparticle fields to be different forms of energy then it does actually change, but that’s just semantics.

        • kn0wmad1c
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          If all discernable heat is unobservable and unobtainable, then semantics don’t matter. Everything still dies. I’d include “heat” in that mix, but that’s waxing philosophical

    • @modus
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      So where do smells go?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            well i’m not very old yet so i can smell many different ways depending on how recently i showered and whether i put on perfume

            • beefbot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              ;) nah I was being doofily punny, like “how could you tell?”

  • @BilboBargains
    link
    English
    624 months ago

    I imagine a physicist would invoke entropy to describe the diffusion of pressure waves and vibration into other forms of energy. Neuroscience might explain the propagation of signals from the cochlea into the brain. A psychologist could hypothesise on the influence of music on our mood and ideas. A philosopher might talk about the influence of music on the way we build our society and how that feeds back into our music. In this way, the music never stops, it continues on as echos rippling through through the universe.

    • @lohky
      link
      English
      104 months ago

      I think this is my favorite comment I’ve read on Lemmy so far.

    • @assassinatedbyCIA
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      We didn’t start the music, it was always playing since the world was turning

      • @BilboBargains
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        Beautiful. We are just one of many instruments that express the music.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      That gave me some real Alan Watts vibes. If this came from your own brain, be proud of this comment. Beautifully worded and inspiring.

      • @BilboBargains
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        Thank you and funny you should say that because Watts is an inspiration. From a scientific point of view some of his ideas were a little tenuous but as a teacher on the subject of the ineffable he was quite peerless.

  • GHiLA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    604 months ago

    You absorb it into your soul and it changes you irreversibly forever.

  • FackCurs
    link
    English
    454 months ago

    As the waves from ocean, the music crashes on the beaches in your ears

  • @rhacer
    link
    English
    444 months ago

    Everyone knows this duh!

    Into your heart!

  • arthurpizza
    link
    English
    334 months ago

    It rolls up into the other side of the cassette. Just flip it over.

    • @angrystego
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I thought the sentence was going to lead to something like “It rolls up into the other 8 inaccessibly tiny dimensions of our space.”

      I love your oldschool explanation though!

  • @finitebanjo
    link
    English
    324 months ago

    Sounds move very very fast, faster than a runner or a car, so it goes very very far away.

      • @RizzRustbolt
        link
        English
        74 months ago

        Now do a “Calvin’s Dad” explanation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        When eli2000BCE? Coming out

        Tho needith explanation to the highest degree, in between pilliaging villages and plauge season

    • @espentan
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      Like, to the next town over, or even further?

      • @finitebanjo
        link
        English
        54 months ago

        Only way to find out is to get there faster.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      So like can i get like a net and catch it? Like its my music i paid for so like i gotta keep it for safe keeping. Do i gotta go to another town and get it that way???

      Lmao im joking Good explanation tho

    • @RedditWanderer
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      But gets slower and more tired as he runs, until he dies?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    314 months ago

    I’m not a scientist by a long shot, but my understanding is that sound if indeed a wave, carried by a medium (air, water, etc). Upon hitting your eardrum, this wave is converted by your eardrum and your auditory nerve into signals your brain decodes. The remainder of the wave continues though, until it runs out of medium, hits an obstacle (basically another medium) or dissipates. Again, just my layman’s understanding!

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      204 months ago

      Don’t forget the inverse square law. Even without a change in medium or any obstacles, the strength of the signal decrease over distance until it is undetectable.

      This is also why there are no extraterrestrial civilizations hearing any radio broadcasts from Earth. Our transmitters are so weak that any signals we send out fade into the CMB before they get any real distance.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          They would not have been able to watch it from an original OTA broadcast, no.

        • @nieceandtows
          link
          English
          34 months ago

          Unless they have an extensive network of wormhole repeateds

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            They’ve probably just got a spy satellite around earth that transmits back. Or maybe an extremely directional antenna / receiver dish would work, since they’re focused on Earth specifically.

      • @Clent
        link
        English
        94 months ago

        You area conflating auditory waves with radio waves.

        These are very much not the same thing. Sound waves require a medium while radio waves do not.

        Radio waves travel vast distances through space while sound doesn’t travel at all.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          -64 months ago

          Space is a medium, as exemplified by the fact that light curves around massive objects, because the space is curved.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            104 months ago

            Space isn’t a medium because mediums have privileged frames of reference.

            You’re talking about spacetime which is a field, not a medium.

            • Nougat
              link
              fedilink
              -24 months ago

              So you’re saying that light can travel through not-space?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                54 months ago

                Light is also not “stuff” - it’s electromagnetic radiation. It’s by the unprivileged intertial frame of reference that we define the speed of light. Light’s speed is the speed at which it travels unimpeded through the spacetime “field”. Additionally light does not accelerate or change speed in any way while traveling in that frame.

                Unless you’re asking if light travels through things that are not the field known as the spacetime continuum in which case yes: light travels (and changes speed) through all sorts of materials. Like glass.

                • Nougat
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  Don’t materials also need to exist in space?

      • Rhaedas
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        If they didn’t fade with distance, this is as far as they have gotten. So for now we are still quiet in the dark forest.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod
        link
        English
        44 months ago

        If we had FTL I’d be a radio archaeologist, flying out to various distances to attempt to capture lost episodes of old TV shows like Doctor Who

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      A little bit reflexts off your eardrumm too!

    • @NocturnalMorning
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      False, it gets stuck in my head, to be played over and over until the next song gets stuck in my head.

  • madjo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    234 months ago

    It goes into your memory. That’s why you can remember a song that you heard before.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    174 months ago

    It keeps traveling. If you splash some water, where does the wave go? Same question - it terms into something you can no longer see or hear… It never goes away. It becomes part of the world, forever

    Music is what you hear - but it was only ever sound waves

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It stays in our brain and we subconsciously put it into new music years later, thereby keeping the industry’s corporate lawyers in cocaine for future decades to come.