• @w_l_l_w
    link
    402 days ago

    The fact that the head in the bottom panel was just flipped, with such an asymmetrical haircut, is really annoying me (。•́︿•̀。)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 days ago

    okay, fine, but not being able to leave your house is no excuse for having … I’m just gonna say the opinions that people on Lemmy have.

    • @PugJesusOP
      link
      English
      32 days ago

      okay, fine, but not being able to leave your house is no excuse for having … I’m just gonna say the opinions that people on Lemmy have.

      Yeah, I can’t believe the number of people on here who think Star Trek > Star Wars, smh, straight-up sickness

    • @mossy_
      link
      English
      42 days ago

      MrsGendered’s instagram series on MLP has been a guilty pleasure of mine (despite having no knowledge on the series)

    • @weeeeum
      link
      English
      42 days ago

      Was gonna check it out but the popup kicked me out

  • @j4k3
    link
    English
    282 days ago

    posture god rule.

    Where my real d- bed buddies at

    • @egrets
      link
      12 days ago

      I genuinely expected better of c/196 than ignorant comments like this to be upvoted.

      • @jaybone
        link
        52 days ago

        Why is this ignorant?

        • @shneancy
          link
          5
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          person in a fem outfit & haircut with facial hair -> most likely some flavour of non binary

          this really isn’t hard to understand when you know nonbinary people exist. Going “she has a moustache?” as if they are 10 years behind on any news regarding queer people indeed comes across as rather ignorant. Though it’s not outright bigotry which is good

          • @weeeeum
            link
            English
            122 hours ago

            I mean, at the same time, I would say the vast majority of people have never seen a woman in person with a moustache.

          • @Ostrakon
            link
            172 days ago

            Devil’s advocate: not everyone has the same context as you. Perhaps this commenter was one of today’s lucky 10,000.

            I think jumping to the conclusion that the comment and the uovote/down vote state of any given community is hostile is not really a healthy state of mind to be in.

            • @egrets
              link
              31 day ago

              Unfortunately - and particularly in online discourse - it’s difficult to determine in the first instance whether someone is authentic or sealioning (that is, trying to start a “debate” in bad faith). In a trans-positive community with frequent memes on gender fluidity, it’s not unreasonable to assume that someone posing a question like this is being deliberately detrimental.

            • @shneancy
              link
              3
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              yeah no i agree. I was explaining that from a perspective of someone who’s been online in the Anglo-sphere for a quite a while. The perspective of most people who give out upvotes/down votes.

              Relatively to someone like me, that comment is ignorant.

              and I know that word has negative connotations, but we all were all ignorant about most things at some point, every one of us is relatively ignorant about some things all the time.

              I mostly abstained from personal commentary and just gave an explanation. But I did specifically point out that that person didn’t start from a position of bigotry - which is good, and to me it means that they’re just new to the topic and genuinely confused by something unexpected

              edit: reading my comment again i did come off as pretty annoyed, apologies for that, that wasn’t my intention, though i do have to say, having to explain that queer people exist is getting pretty tiring