The transfer tunnel, known by the Russian acronym PrK, connects the Zvezda module with a docking port where Soyuz crew and Progress resupply spacecraft attach to the station.

Air has been leaking from the transfer tunnel since September 2019. On several occasions, Russian cosmonauts have repaired the cracks and temporarily reduced the leak rate. In February, the leak rate jumped up again to 2.4 pounds per day, then increased to 3.7 pounds per day in April.

“The Russian position is that the most probable cause of the PrK cracks is high cyclic fatigue caused by micro-vibrations,” Cabana said on November 13. “NASA believes the PrK cracks are likely multi-causal, including pressure and mechanical stress, residual stress, material properties, and environmental exposures.”

Crew members aboard the space station are keeping the hatch leading to the PrK closed when they don’t need to access the Progress cargo freighter docked at the other end of the transfer tunnel. Russian cosmonauts must open the hatch to unpack supplies from the Progress or load trash into the ship for disposal.

As a precaution, Barratt said space station crews are also closing the hatch separating the US and Russian sections of the space station when cosmonauts are working in the PrK.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    125 hours ago

    Because there’s a hole in it, stupid.

    That’ll be five million dollar bucks for my consultation.

  • Optional
    link
    English
    206 hours ago

    The ISS has been leaking air for 5 years, and engineers still don’t know why

    *raises hand*

    Uh, is it the cold unforgiving vacuum of space that forbids our existence there?

    • @Aermis
      link
      English
      121 minutes ago

      Space doesn’t really have a temperature as you need something to be hot or cold! And in the vacuum there isn’t much.

      So just unforgiving vacuum.

  • @anonymous111
    link
    English
    298 hours ago

    Fill the ISS with water and you’ll be able to see the leak.

    • @SirSamuel
      link
      English
      447 hours ago

      This is probably the dumbest thing I’ve heard. You clearly have no idea what you’re taking about. To find the leak they need to spray the outside with soapy water. If that doesn’t work the next step is to put the ISS in a bathtub and fill the bathtub with water

      • @anonymous111
        link
        English
        227 hours ago

        Idiot. You obviously have no idea about the logistics of launching a bath into space. You’d need to send a bucket on a rocket (aero dynamic).

        Put the ISS into the bucket, fill with water, then squeeze the ISS and look for bubbles.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 hours ago

          Fucking fools. Just use a robotic arm to bend the whole suspect section. You’ll see the cracks open up as you flex it back and forth, and can spray some flex seal in the cracks. Seriously, try a little bit.

        • @SirSamuel
          link
          English
          34 hours ago

          Clearly you’re thinking with your feet, because if you used your brain you’d know you bring the ISS to the bathtub, not the other way around

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          76 hours ago

          What a bunch of morons. Just hang some clothes around the ISS and if they wave you’ve found your leak. No need to send anything because astronauts already have clothes up there …

          • @SupraMario
            link
            English
            75 hours ago

            You all are fools, all this time finding the leak and none of you brought the tire patch

  • @aeronmelon
    link
    English
    4410 hours ago

    “The ISS is leaking?? Where?”

    “It’s high overhead, orbiting the earth at tremendous speed. But that’s not important right now.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    119 hours ago

    Question: When Air leaks from the ISS, does it just orbit with it indefinitely as an “air bubble” or maybe a dispersed “air cloud” around it or will it eventually settle down into the atmosphere?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      178 hours ago

      In a vacuum, gas will expand indefinitely, so they probably become stray atoms of gas, that will orbit for a little, ocassionallt hitting each other and probably eventually falling back in the atmosphere.

    • midori
      link
      English
      210 hours ago

      They just need to get their hands on HRAs to keep the hiss at bay. Where’s Dr. Darling??

  • @rockSlayer
    link
    English
    2111 hours ago

    Someone needs to close the damn window, we aren’t paying to heat the entire universe

  • EleventhHour
    link
    English
    2211 hours ago

    Because it’s a slapped-together mess of duct tape and hope?

    The ISS is old. It was never meant to last past 2013. At this point, minor malfunctions, like this are expected.

    The ISS needs to be replaced with a larger orbital research platform.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 hours ago

      The ISS is modular

      It needs a new module. Undo the tinker toys and put them back together.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 hours ago

      The question is how much would it cost to build such? I believe the International Space Station itself cost like $100 billion to build, which is a lot of money. Now, maybe Space Station construction costs have dropped in the like 20 years, or something like that, since then.

      • optional
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 hours ago

        $100 billion sounds a lot, but in comparison it’s miniscule. For that amount of money you can either run an international space station for 24 years or the US military for 1.3 months, or the russian military for one year. If we’d just start killing eachother a little less, we could easily save that much money.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 hours ago

          Well, apparently it cost a hundred billion to actually build the thing and that was in like dollars in 2000. So you’d have to hope that space station development went down faster than inflation went up. And if so, it might actually cost a little bit less to build it today.

  • @rtxn
    link
    English
    911 hours ago

    Have they tried lighting a match and following the smoke?