• @Gammelfisch
    link
    English
    139 seconds ago

    Does the racist Hesgeth fully understand that the Christians are slowly being squeezed out of Israel too? He should replace his Jerusalem Cross crap with the Star of David.

    • @BeMoreCareful
      link
      English
      73 hours ago

      We’ve said we’ll attack of they ever try to prosecute.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    687 hours ago

    If you love America, you should love NATO and be using Ukraine to make sure Russia never has power again. If you really want to game geopolitics you convince Ukraine to capture parts of Russia and you help them out. Israel was important for our God the Petro Dollar, but eventually you can’t convince everyone that the kid going around stabbing everyone else is in fact not doing that.

  • @FelixCressOP
    link
    English
    767 hours ago

    "At the same time, the man who would head America’s gigantic military has tied US foreign policy almost entirely to the priority of Israel, a country of which he says: “If you love America, you should love Israel.”

    Elsewhere, Hegseth appears to argue that the US military should ignore the Geneva conventions and any international laws governing the conduct of war, and instead “unleash them” to become a “ruthless”, "

    Fuuuuckin hell!

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      -487 hours ago

      This is why we can’t ignore it when the only other option is allowed to do whatever because it’s not as bad.

      If more people had made more noise when Biden continually violated the Leahy Law and circumvented Congress to provide arms to an ongoing genocide… We had a chance to fix the system. To hold him accountable and make sure no matter who was the next president, they’d also be able to be held accountable

      Instead the majority of Dems ignored it or worse made excuses for why Biden doesn’t need to follow US or international law.

      • @jumjummy
        link
        English
        73 hours ago

        If after making noise, you either voted 3rd party or didn’t vote, you supported even more genocide and allowed Trump to win. Stop with this idiotic line of reasoning that somehow holding Biden accountable was more important than stopping Trump from becoming president.

        You Russian stooge.

      • @PugJesus
        link
        English
        727 hours ago

        Letting fascists win and still finding a way to put the REAL blame on the LIBS.

        Just absolutely astounding.

        • Orbituary
          link
          English
          136 hours ago

          Libs are not the left. They’re just barely left of the GOP.

          Everything looks hard right to my tired eyes.

          • @PugJesus
            link
            English
            286 hours ago

            Didn’t say liberals were ‘the left’. Just said that letting fascists win and putting the blame on the liberals, as every other problem in America apparently lays upon, is absurd.

              • @PugJesus
                link
                English
                23
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                The Dems were responsible for running a bad campaign. 2/3s of the American electorate were responsible for approving of, or not caring about, fascism. These fascists are now doing fascist things, which is, believe it or not, the fascists’ fault.

                • ALQ
                  link
                  English
                  75 hours ago

                  Woah, woah, hold up a minute. Since when are we expected to take personal responsibility? I intend to blame you when I cut off my nose to spite my face. You can’t change the rules now!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            14 minutes ago

            Did he also run on a platform supporting the holocaust “because it’s in the interest of our country and our ally” despite much of much of his constiuency and nearly the entire rest of the world saying otherwise?

            Did his supporters call their fellow party members “stupid, single-issue voters” when they vehemently rejected said platform?

          • @PugJesus
            link
            English
            136 hours ago

            At that point you’re not far from actual tankie positions.

      • @blackbelt352
        link
        English
        136 hours ago

        If more people had made more noise when Biden continually violated the Leahy Law and circumvented Congress to provide arms to an ongoing genocide… We had a chance to fix the system. To hold him accountable and make sure no matter who was the next president, they’d also be able to be held accountable.

        Citizens did make noise, citizens did point out that he violated Leahy Law, and the way to hold politicians accountable in a democracy is getting them out of office and away from the levers of power. Well here we are, Biden and Dems are going out of office and the genocide is going to be actively being accelerated by the Trump administration gleefully flooding Israel with more weapons “cleanse” Gaza so they can build their gaudy hotels and fulfill some Book of Revelations prophesy because the republican party is absolutely flooded with Dominionists.

        Good. Fucking. Job.

        • @jumperalex
          link
          English
          46 hours ago

          Exactly.

          And the real irony is that of the two candidates, which one is most likely to respond to post-election pressure to adjust the policies?

          Sure sure sure, Trump can be influenced by money and flattery, but the people that are going to pay and flatter him are not exactly the ones arguing to save the lives of innocent civilians.

          So the irony remains, of the two candidates to choose from, the people complaining about what is happening in Gaza picked the one least likely to do anything helpful once elected (“do” as opposed to what they said to get elected).

          • FlashMobOfOne
            link
            English
            04 hours ago

            which one is most likely to respond to post-election pressure to adjust the policies?

            On the issue of Israel, neither. They have exactly the same policies.

            • @Crankenstein
              link
              English
              23 hours ago

              And there is no political leverage the proletariat has to push for policy change after the election. The pressure came from “do what we say or at election time we vote for someone else”

              Well, every fucking election when it comes time to follow through after they again failed to hold up their end of the bargain the majority gets cold feet and caves to familiarity because risking change is scary.

              • FlashMobOfOne
                link
                English
                21 hour ago

                You’re not wrong.

                That’s why 99% of voters pick the same two shitty parties that are driving them to the brink of homelessness.

            • @jumperalex
              link
              English
              -13 hours ago

              I didn’t ask which has the different policy now (ignoring my opinion about the truth of your assertion) but which is most likely to be responsive to public opinion; and I’d add, which one actually cares about the plight of others and which is an unofficially diagnosed narcissist.

              But I’m fairly certain we won’t agree and sadly we’ll never know what Kamala coulda/woulda done. But with trump we’re about to Find Out. I hope we’re both wrong about him.

              • FlashMobOfOne
                link
                English
                11 hour ago

                which is most likely to be responsive to public opinion

                Neither. There were states that voted 11% undecided in the Democratic primaries with the explicit public purpose of trying to force Dems to stop sending WMD’s to Israel. That was a fairly significant public statement on administration policy.

                The Dems ignored them and sent more WMD’s anyway.

                Whether you agree with me or not is immaterial. On the issue of Israel’s genocide, both parties are exactly the same.

                • @jumperalex
                  link
                  English
                  18 minutes ago

                  I don’t agree that 11% undecided in the primary is a “fairly significant public statement”, I mean, literally 11% is like, you know, small. Nor does a lack of policy change during the election cycle (which has a lot more factors than just Gaza to consider) immediately mean Kamala wouldn’t be open to changing tactics post election. But we’ll never know because, like I said, Trump won and now we get to find out if voting for him was net good or net bad for the Gaza cause.

                  But I can appreciate the emotional investment you have in “both sides-ing” this and ignoring the material differences between a narcissist that is already talking about lifting arms restrictions to Israel and Kamala.

                  Weather you agree with me or not is immaterial. On the issue of both parties being the same, you’re wrong. See how easy that is to say and it means nothing to an actual debate?

                  -Cheers

        • @givesomefucks
          link
          English
          -85 hours ago

          So…

          You think because a small minority tried to hold Biden to a higher standard…

          That it’s their fault Kamala lost when people who aren’t politically engaged didn’t want to vote for someone who said she agreed with (literally) everything Biden had done and wouldn’t have changed anything?

          You’re saying that since Biden wasnt held accountable and Dems lost, the lesson is for no one to ever try to hold a Dem accountable?

          Like, I’ve heard that before, usually I just block people with those opinions because I’d just never have a productive exchange with them…

          But you kind of beat around the bush there.

          Are you really blaming the voters and not the candidate?

          • @blackbelt352
            link
            English
            112 minutes ago

            I think Dems lost because a some of missteps along the way and some external factors. I think Biden should have said he wasn’t running again sooner, there should have been a proper primary, there needed to be even more of a focus on economic populism and making actual progress, not just trying to maintain the status quo. There were a lot of people who just didn’t vote. And then Republicans

            At the end of the day, the only people who have an opinion about Palestine are politically engaged leftists who want to see the genocide stop and anyone watching Fox News who wants Israel to win. For the rest of America unfortunately, it doesn’t matter to them. That’s a fight happening halfway around the world between 2 nations that aren’t us.

            I would have loved to see a peaceful end to the conflict, but that’s wasn’t going to realistically happen either way, but I would much preferred to see as little escalation as possible, and trump is nothing but escalation.

            So again, we punished democrats in the way democracy punishes people who actually believe in democratic processes and let republicans who don’t give 2 shits about democratic processes get to run rampant in the government. Good. Fucking. Job.

      • @Carrolade
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Biden didn’t actually violate the Leahy Law. Here’s the relevant section:

        No assistance shall be furnished under this Act or the Arms Export Control Act to any unit of the security forces of a foreign country if the Secretary of State has credible information that such unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.

        with a later amendment that included DoD-derived funding.

        Which units got arms that were engaged in rights violations? I understand that isn’t very satisfying when we know Israel has committed war crimes, but the law does not specify country, it specifies military unit. So, which unit should be barred from receiving arms? The others will still be able to legally receive them in full compliance with the Leahy Law.

        Then we also have:

        (b) Exception.—The prohibition in subsection (a)(1) shall not apply if the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, determines that the government of such country has taken all necessary corrective steps, or if the equipment or other assistance is necessary to assist in disaster relief operations or other humanitarian or national security emergencies.

        This clause frankly creates a legal loophole the size of a Merkava.

        edit for formatting

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        English
        -14 hours ago

        This is why we can’t ignore it when the only other option is allowed to do whatever because it’s not as bad.

        It doesn’t matter. 99% of voters pick one of the two ruling parties every time, and both of them are pro-genocide.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 hours ago

          I don’t believe it’s direct support for genocide, more than that genocide is an acceptable price for others to pay for American Imperialism/Exceptionalism.

          • FlashMobOfOne
            link
            English
            21 hour ago

            I’d consider giving a country more WMD’s in the middle of bombing hospitals, apartment buildings, and kids pro-genocide.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 hour ago

              What I mean is that it’s just the means to the end of projecting US power in the middle east.

              They’ll maintain power via Israel not matter the price.

        • @Crankenstein
          link
          English
          03 hours ago

          Exactly. Can’t have change from within the system when the vast majority willingly throws away their political leverage and uncritically grants power to genocidal imperialists.

          How many empty promises must people fall victim to before they decide to do something other than beg for change?

      • Orbituary
        link
        English
        -96 hours ago

        I have no idea why you’re getting down voted. You’re absolutely right. Lots of sour grapes and copium happening with Dems. I plugged my nose voting for Harris feeling what you mentioned in my bones.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 hours ago

          Don’t worry they’ll learn a lesson from this that they need to go further right yet again in order to beat the right in an election. Don’t let the fact that they keep losing distract you from the fact that this is a winning strategy.

          • @AbidanYre
            link
            English
            -34 hours ago

            When the further right candidate gets more votes, which direction would you suggest they go?

            • @Crankenstein
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              They get more votes because when you only have two candidates, and both are appealing to the right, the one who is fully right wing will beat out the one that is offering half assed attempts at pandering. And that isn’t even beginning to get into the propaganda from the right that Dems are nothing but sleezy liars who will say anything to get their way, and then the Dems literally start doing that, won’t win over anyone from across the isle.

              A simple analogy is you have two cake shops, both selling for the same price (a single vote). One advertising a generic square cake and the other a three tier masterpiece with all the bells and whistles. It’s quite obvious who is gonna get the most customers.

              Meanwhile the rest of the population gets further and further disillusioned with the system and stops participating when its obvious that it doesn’t care to represent their interests.

        • @givesomefucks
          link
          English
          -25 hours ago

          The candidates the party run are supported by a very small but very very vocal subgroup of the Dem party who were Republicans before Bill Clinton.

          Those candidates almost never win elections, they only have a chance when the Republican is a literal fascist.

          The problem is rather than just let a candidate in that the majority of Dem voters want…

          They pull shit like Hillary did in 2015 to help the worst Republicans hoping it’s enough to get people to vote for a neoliberal. Because they’d rather have a fascist that agrees with them economically than a progressive Dem.

  • @Crankenstein
    link
    English
    33 hours ago

    Cool. I don’t love America. I fucking despise this country and everything it stands for. Israel can fall with it, never should have existed in the first place.

    The world would be leagues better for it.

    • @Dead_or_Alive
      link
      English
      -257 minutes ago

      Cool, may you get your wish and live in a Chinese/Russian dominated part of the world.

      • @Crankenstein
        link
        English
        333 minutes ago

        Nice false dichotomy you got there bucko.

        Imperialism is bad no matter the flavor.

  • @PugJesus
    link
    English
    357 hours ago

    I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again - not a single redeeming quality in any of Trump’s picks.

    • EleventhHour
      link
      English
      86 hours ago

      It’s like being at the circus and watching a clown car pull up and having to witness all of the horrible people piling out of it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    206 hours ago

    You want your country to use WWI tactics and leave soldiers behind? This dude is your guy because no competent general will follow his orders. You will see a massive exodus of the top brass and we will be left with the incompetent assholes.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      English
      95 hours ago

      I would wager that much of the top brass would stick around just to cause as many legal problems as they can. We’re kinda stubborn that way, though I only made it to mid-brass.

  • @NatakuNox
    link
    English
    96 hours ago

    Ya im sure he’d love it if other nations ignored trade deals with America in response? These people don’t know how anything works. Leaving nato and the UN would be catastrophic for our economy.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 hours ago

    Reading through this … it sounds much worse than I thought.

  • shoulderoforion
    link
    fedilink
    -236 hours ago

    Big fan of NATO, but the UN is an antisemitic fascist/arab playground unfit for purpose, and has been for decades now. Also not a fan of this MAGA rapist, but that goes without saying.