Summary

Tesla reported its first annual decline in deliveries, with 1.79 million vehicles delivered in 2024 compared to 1.81 million in 2023.

Fourth-quarter deliveries (495,570) fell short of analyst estimates, causing Tesla shares to drop 7%.

Challenges included rising competition in Europe and China, declining sales despite price cuts, and growing inventory of Cybertrucks.

Analysts cited CEO Elon Musk’s political involvement as a potential distraction.

While Tesla plans to release lower-cost autonomous vehicles in 2025, its lack of affordable EVs and intensified competition have strained its market dominance.

  • @ATDA
    link
    14 hours ago

    Yeah if the parking lot full of cyberderps I drove past doay says anything the post preorder sales may be slouching.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 day ago

    I’m amazed there is still 1.79 people who don’t follow the news or how much of a toddler Musk is.

    Nobody wants to invest in anything he touches anymore,and he has shown he will just disable software in vehicles if he feels like it. Wonder how long until he starts targeting his opponents with his vehicles, he’s already doing it with his other platforms.

    • @Redfugee
      link
      21 day ago

      I don’t get it but it is wrong to say nobody wants to invest in his stuff, look at the stock, it has already bounced back.

    • @Pulsar
      link
      1322 days ago

      I think Tesla is fairly valued.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Could you explain it to me? (no sarcasm) It seems to be saying that the stock prices are way out of balance to what it’s worth. Are there regulations around that?

          Edit: I’m talking about the Market Cap part. I don’t understand how the value can be that high compared to all of the other companies, especially China.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            612 days ago

            Market capitalization is just simple math, multiplying a company’s stock price by the number of shares that have been issued. Tesla has issued roughly 3.2 billion shares and is currently trading at around $550, which makes their current market cap about $1.75 trillion dollars.

            I don’t understand how the value can be that high compared to all of the other companies, especially China.

            On its face it seems utterly nonsensical that Tesla is worth as much as all other auto makers combined, when Tesla only accounts for something like 5% of total US car sales. There are two reasons I can think of why this is currently so:

            • Tesla accounts for roughly half of all US electric vehicle sales, and electric vehicle sales are roughly 10% of all US vehicle sales. If electric vehicles largely replace ICE vehicles and if Tesla maintains that share of EV sales, then Tesla will be an extremely valuable company. Investors might be betting on a) electric vehicles and b) Tesla continuing to the win the lion’s share of electric vehicle sales.
            • Tesla investors are irrational. Personally, my money is on this one. I think long-term Tesla is going to get crushed by cheaper and better-built EVs, probably from China but also possibly from other existing car manufacturers. Sometimes I’m tempted to short Tesla’s stock based on this belief, but to quote John Maynard Keynes: “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
            • @Cornelius_Wangenheim
              link
              12
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It’s more that Tesla is a bubble. The thing with bubbles is that it’s actually completely rational to buy into them while they’re inflating. As long as you get out before they pop, you can make a ton of money.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 day ago

                All of that, plus an additional bit of irrationally, since SpaceX is private, some investors are in Tesla with the idea that some future corporate action will cause Tesla shares to eventually include SpaceX ownership as well.

                • @Cornelius_Wangenheim
                  link
                  31 day ago

                  It’s rational on an individual level because you can know it’s a bubble, know the company is overvalued and yet still conclude that the best move is to buy. It’s risky, but the question is if the risk/reward ratio is better or worse than the alternatives. In the case of TSLA, you’d have made well over 10x your money if you had bought in 2019. It’s why bubbles keep happening despite everyone knowing they exist and will pop eventually.

            • @captainlezbian
              link
              152 days ago

              I subscr to the theory that Tesla is valued not as an automotive stock but as a tech stock. Companies like Toyota and VW are valued wildly different from companies like Google and Amazon and tesla has long pushed for everyone to think of it as far more like apple than like Honda, with quite a bit of success. That’s why Elon does his whole Tony stark/Steve jobs routine and swears full self driving and other revolutionary tech. Because otherwise you have to look at his vehicles as the gilded Yugos they are that do have some really great aspects, but ones that are now being done by companies like Hyundai that can actually assemble a car well

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              152 days ago

              Thank you for explaining it so well. I thought that was what it was, but it seems insane to be valued that much higher to investors. Turns out, it probably is insane.

              • idunnololz
                link
                102 days ago

                And remember if you want to try to cash in on this information “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent”

          • @khannie
            link
            English
            32 days ago

            The entire circle represents total value for all car makers. Area taken up is their ratio of the total. It’s geographically colour coded.

          • @NotMyOldRedditName
            link
            1
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Tesla makes a lot more profit per car sold than the other OEMs, and part of the stock price assumed continued growth which would mean even more record profits.

            In 2023, Tesla made more net profit than Ford and GM combined on their 1.8m vehicles compared to their 10.6m. Tesla also had really strong growth until this year, and extrapolating the growth and the profits they make led to a higher price. (edit: and in 2022 GM/Ford combined were just slightly above Tesla)

            Tesla also has their energy division which is growing rapidly and has better margins than the cars (>100% YoY growth in 2024 and potentially > 100% in 2025)

            Nowadays though, it’s more on the future potential of FSD/Robotics which is a huge wildcard.

            People don’t see Ford or GM or Toyota massively expanding so they don’t get a higher P/E ratio. In actuality, they’ve got years of suffering ahead of them during the transition.

            Then you have companies like Nissan failing being one of the first domino’s in the EV transition, and VW getting destroyed in China causing massive layoffs (25%) and a planned 700k vehicle reduction in 2025.

            I’m not saying they deserve the price they have today, but it’s more than just cars sold to get to a number, it’s looking at future potential.

        • Pumpkin Escobar
          link
          English
          122 days ago

          Seriously, I’d love to see this chart, earnings chart and PE ratio chart to really see the whole picture

          • @NotMyOldRedditName
            link
            16
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I don’t have a chart for you but

            2023 net profit

            Toyota - 31.82b

            VW AG- 17.331B

            Tesla - 14.999b

            BMW - 12.165B

            GM - 10.1b

            Ford - 4.347B

            BYD - 4.16B

            Edit: Just to preempt this, yes Tesla is suffering a lot more this year with the EV price wars, for the first 3 quarters, they’re at 4.78b this year, whereas GM for example is at 8.97B. GM doesn’t make a lot of profits (if any) on their EVs, but they still have ICE vehicles to fall back on whereas Tesla doesn’t.

      • JWBananas
        link
        English
        92 days ago

        Nissan conspicuously absent

          • JWBananas
            link
            English
            22 days ago

            Nissan and Renault have 15% cross-ownership each. Both are separate entities with separate market caps. The total displayed for Renault does not reflect the total for Nissan.

            They must have thrown it into “other” along with Mitsubishi which is also in merger talks with Honda.

      • Optional
        link
        122 days ago

        So the graphic shows the overvalued stock as proof of it being fairly valued?

        • @kautau
          link
          482 days ago

          My guess is there’s an invisible /s there

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 days ago

          Not at all. The billionaire oligarchs are in on the plan. They’re using Tesla to get even more rich. They’ll pull out/short just before something happens to cause Tesla to lose all it’s value.

          • @captainlezbian
            link
            42 days ago

            It’s more like a variant game of chicken. The longer everyone stays in the higher the value goes, but once people start bailing you better hope you sold enough for it to be worthwhile. The big investors set the game but they’re also the most constrained because if they pull out entirely or quickly they can pop the bubble and they may not be able to sell their shares fast enough to get all their money before shares plummet.

          • Optional
            link
            12 days ago

            Technically that thing has already happened. Or, is still happening I guess.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 days ago

        Truly Elon is a Savant of our time to build such an incredibly successful company while failing to even capture an appreciable proportion of actual sales. Real “voice of a generation” level shit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -12 days ago

          What on Earth are you talking about? Someone posted a thing above that shows Tesla at #3 in profits.That’s pretty big. The dude sucks, and he’s openly tossing money around trying to influence elections, and he is a known liar and fraud. The company is way overvalued. You don’t have to exaggerate and say Tesla fails at selling cars to criticize him.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 days ago

            But Tesla does fail at selling cars. They’re an unprofitable company that sells far fewer cars than their bloated valuation justifies.

      • SeaJ
        link
        fedilink
        62 days ago

        Their revenue is about half of Ford’s.

      • @NewNewAccount
        link
        32 days ago

        Shocked Ferrari is worth more than Volkswagen. I wonder how much of that is F1-related.

      • @mkwt
        link
        32 days ago

        Now do one that counts vehicles delivered.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean, all that proves is that the Stock Market is completely irrational and always has been and using as a metric for whether or not “the economy” is doing good has always been a fucking farce.

      Tesla isn’t the only massively overvalued company in existence at the moment, just the biggest and most obvious example.

      Theranos was valued at around $9 billion before it all came out that it was a scam.

      • @baldingpudenda
        link
        92 days ago

        Damn, I remember that reddit post about the lab rat being told to falsify evidence or lie. I have a friend who’s in the industry and he was going crazy about it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      172 days ago

      The day that bubble bursts will be hilarious. I’ll probably grab popcorn and livestream Twitter for Musky’s meltdown

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod
      link
      32 days ago

      It took some work, but I got them out of my 401k. So many funds have TSLA stock.

  • @demizerone
    link
    English
    562 days ago

    I bought into the shit he was marketing back in 2019. I got a Model 3 and a single share of Tesla stock, and realized pretty quickly after a year of FSD not improving that Elon was full of shit. Some time later that one share turned into three because tesla did a stock split so elon could buy twitter, then sometime after shareholders approved a 50 billion pay package (not me).

    So when he bought the republican party and the stock shot up, I got out. Didn’t make any money, but fuck that guy. I cannot stand this Mfer or his shitty companies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -5
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Anything can be fixed on your own if you have the aptitude. But i can imagine dropping a battery pack that weighs whag a regular economy sedan weighs will be tough for even the most competent diy people. Ive swapped a few engines and honestly i would rather not fix a tesla. Im good with a toyota hybrid.

      People thinking were going to het rid of ice vehicles and transition to a market that is compromised of a majority lithium based batteries are smoking some good shit. Firstly i think the amount of electric vehicles sold in 2022 was about 10 million while the amount of cars sold in total was about 80 million. So 12.5% of the new car market. Meanwhile were already reaching a bottleneck of lithium supply which is not great for the environment and super exploitative to third world people and economies. So we need to increase the lithium battery production capacity by at least 1000% and this doesn’t even account for the cordless power tools industry and all the other consumer goods needing lithium batteries. Americans and our world leaders are selling us a pipe dream that is induced on a fever dream of hope and wishful thinking. But it isn’t even that good in practice because have you seen these lithium battery fires? Requiring tens of thousands of gallons of water to extinguish? Its a fucking mess and the only real viable option is to make a breakthrough in solar technology. Or maybe cold fusion? Hibestly im not an expert so i don’t know. But i do know lithium batteries aint fuckin’ it.

      • @iopq
        link
        82 days ago

        China is transitioning to electric just fine. You sound like the guy who predicted only 1 billion people can live on Earth without starving.

        • @nexusband
          link
          5
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          He’s not anti-ev, he’s anti-Li-Io-Battery and I fully agree. China is also only transitioning fine because they have incredibly huge incentives - but they still have a huge amount of ICE Cars being sold, developed and used and they will continue, because Battery EVs are not the “one fits all” solution. Norway has nearly 90% EV sales only. Still doesn’t matter as this does not work for everyone and everyplace.

          FWIW, I still think we have to transition away from fossile fuels as soon as possible and Europe will do so, because due to CO2 Certificates and taxes, fossile fuels will be more expensive than synthetic, carbon neutral fuels that have been made with renewable energy from those places on earth, that have ridiculous abundance of those. Like Chile, Iceland (Geothermal), Ireland and others. We in Europe need the renewable energy for industry and home use, not to drive around with.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 day ago

            Im not anti ev or anti Lifepo batteries, i love my lithium iron phosphate batteries. They make my impact wrench hammer off tough fasteners without having to fuck my back up. Im just pro reality and the reality is there is a serious bottleneck of lithium production.

            But anyone saying we will be able to increase the lithium mining supply 10 times what it is now is selling you a bridge over the straight of Gibraltar. And maybe that bridge will eventually come but were talking about building that bridge over and over and over and over. Society also needs to stop treating vehicles like they are a disposable consumer good and sending them to scrap yards after a decade or less of use. These are realities of the market. Tell me how we are going to increase lithium mining ten times what it is now in a safe and efficient way. There is currently only one lithium mine being built in nevada but there is heavy pushback from state legislature to open up any other lithium deposits in the US but even if we did i don’t see lithium mining producing enough cheap lithium to boost ev production past triple what it currently is.

            I am not saying we don’t need to transition away from ICE. But also we could have had ice vehicles continue to operate in our society for another 5 centuries if big industries weren’t polluting the environment to maintain the production of mostly useless consumer goods that end up in landfills within 6 months of their purchase. All these plastic petro chemicals littering our oceans our coastlines and every where else. Society needs to prioritize what it deems valuable and instead of doing that weve allowed a few greedy sociopaths go prioritize continual growth, profit and shareholder value over the good of society itself.
            But ill be here with popcorn watching and waiting for lifepo batteries to increase in production 1000% (and this doesn’t even count the needed increase for larger industrial power tools that currently struggle to run on anything but gasoline like railway and industrial impact wrenches that are sk large and heavy they need a crane to support their weight during operation.

            • @nexusband
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Hence Synthetic Fuels made from renewable energy and “steering” the market. Making old cars still able to run, but just changing the fuel and making them at least carbon neutral and maybe even net negative in the long run? There is nothing better for the environment - heck, with all the pollution Lithium production does, one could argue we’re changing one evil for another evil, just on a different scale. It’s like switching the old NiMH battery for a LiFePo. (The scaling doesn’t work that well for the energy densities needed in bigger applications though…)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 day ago

                I would love to see consumer hybrid conversion kits or even hydrogen induction tech conversion kits that are fat better than the Jerry rigged ones some youtube content creators rig up with tubing and mason jars. But those in control of the means of production are throwing wrenches into the gears of innovation to maintain their continual growth at the expense of future generations.

                Lifepo batteries are an awesome tech, 15 years ago no one would have imagined them powering impact wrenches that are stronger than traditional pneumatics but here we are. However people are improperly storing them and its leading to house fires not to mention all the cars space karen has produced that have combusted and locked people inside the vehicle while they roast to death unable to open the door manually because the door handles are made out of metal and burn you when you try to open them. Ans the fact thst lithium chemical fires need dozens of times more water to smother in the best of situations. There have been wreched teslas completely submerged in water tanks thst have reignited 2 or 3 times before being completely stifled and rendered safe to dispose of. Its a fucking mess. But they sure do accelerate very well.

  • @blattrules
    link
    English
    622 days ago

    Is musk going to tweet something about a new, futuristic project that Tesla has coming up that he’s just ripping off from an 80s sci-fi movie again so the stock price bumps back up?

    • @Doomsider
      link
      11 day ago

      You see that is not his goal. It is to capture everyone. He already had and still has a lot of liberals. How do you grow your base then? Obviously appeal to the other side.

      It is not an either or thing for him, he wants to fool everyone. You see this behavior in a lot of attention seeking pick me bitches.

    • @Euphorazine
      link
      32 days ago

      MAGA also like cutting spending and Space X relies on billions of tax funding. So buy yourself a president and run fake department that aims at cutting spending so you can be at the table to not cut space X. Maybe let space X “absorb” NASA

    • Flying Squid
      link
      212 days ago

      They may not love their gas guzzlers after a year of super high gas prices.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        202 days ago

        No, they absolutely still do. They just bitch about it more and blame the president.

        When gas hit over $4 a gallon here in Texas, it barely moved the needle on sales of smaller vehicles. Those that did change vehicles went right back to that Ford F950 the second it came back down. Like, no one learned their lesson.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 days ago

      And then he called American tech workers removed. Insulting your customer base is an interesting choice.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    522 days ago

    Deliveries are the closest approximation of sales reported by Tesla but are not precisely defined in the company’s shareholder communications.

    You know, I’m really tired of our country just letting this guy make up whatever fucking metrics he wants, and then we run everything on those fucking wrong-ass metrics. He did the same thing with Twitter and “impressions.” It’s all about lying through your teeth about what’s really happening and using metrics and statistics to confuse people.

    A delivery isn’t the same as a sale, not even close. For instance, they also deliver vehicles after repair.

    • @Sonor
      link
      22 days ago

      good thing there a lot of those nowadays :D

  • @NotMyOldRedditName
    link
    222 days ago

    Teala isn’t releasing 2 lower cost autonomous vehicles in 2025.

    They are releasing 2 lower cost vehicles.

    The robo taxi isn’t until 2026 if you make the assumption it’s on time and is autonomous.

    Saying teala is releasing 2 autonomous vehicles in 2025 is like saying teala sold 1.79 million autonomous vehicles this year.

    • @Euphorazine
      link
      5
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The robo taxi isn’t until 2026 if you make the assumption it’s on time and is autonomous.

      Tesla has said Full Self Driving is coming next year for like 9 straight years in a row, and the only thing that came out of that was “obviously FSD is a marketing term, only an idiot would have bought FSD and thought they get an autonomous vehicle”

      Space X pushed the hyper loop when California pitched their idea of building high speed rail throughout the state, and once they gave space X a grant and cancelled their plans, he dropped the project.

      Tesla’s value comes from vibes and the potential of what some vaporware technology could be worth if they could actually build it.

      I mean honestly, if Tesla could build an autonomous vehicle that could pay for itself in 1 year from taxi fares, why would they sell that to the public? They’d make way more keeping it to themselves or maybe franchising it out. A complete monopoly on the autonomous taxi industry sold for $45,000? Yeah, right.

      • @NotMyOldRedditName
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’m just trying to correct the article dude. It was blatantly wrong, sloppy writing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      152 days ago

      The robo taxi isn’t until 2026 if you make the assumption it’s on time and is autonomous.

      This reminds me of my old physics assignments:

      “Assuming a perfectly spherical cow…”

        • @joshthewaster
          link
          31 day ago

          This is a joke ntended to illustrate the sometimes absurd oversimplification that has to be made to do certain calculations. An apple falls out of a tree from 20 feet off the ground, how long does it take to hit the ground. Well, what is the drag coefficient? Assume it’s a sphere. OK, what about the texture, the air temp, wind, is the ground level and flat, etc etc. And as the problems increase in complexity the number of variables increases exponentially. So your professor might tell you to "Assume it is a spherical cow of uniform density“.

          Often these estimates are actually quite good and trying to account for all variables isn’t needed.

          • @NotMyOldRedditName
            link
            11 day ago

            Sounds like fun. There’s going to be that 1 grad student who is like, but how close of approximation is it really and can we use other knowledge to fine tune it… I’m going to launch a cow with a trebuchet and get some better answers.

    • @prof_wafflez
      link
      112 days ago

      Anyone who gets into one of those robo taxis is asking for death.

      • @NotMyOldRedditName
        link
        152 days ago

        Any sane government won’t let them on the road until that is decidedly not the case.

        Asking for a sane government is a big ask nowadays it seems though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 days ago

          Hey now the DMV could ban them here in California and then ignore any attempt by the feds to override that, supremacy clause only exists when you have the budget to enforce it after all.

          • @NotMyOldRedditName
            link
            42 days ago

            I know this is completely unrelated… but it just made me think of a Robotaxi arriving from Nevada, and the LAPD go in pursuit since they’re illegal in California, then the LAPD decide to do a pit maneuver on it because it doesn’t stop and it kills 2 pedestrians on the street as a result.

            • @Wispy2891
              link
              22 days ago

              Pit maneuver? Isn’t just enough to throw a orange cone on the hood?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Thats super unrealistic since LAPD would never do that, San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department would total the thing out by Primm or CHP would impound it.

  • @apfelwoiSchoppen
    link
    182 days ago

    I shake my head at Tesla drivers and throw a hand job gesture to every wankpanzer I see. There isn’t enough public shaming of fascists and their enablers.

    • @baldingpudenda
      link
      102 days ago

      Yesterday, my wife saw a cybertruck for the first time. She went “wtf. Is that fugly thing a cybertruck?” I guess the pictures didn’t do it justice.

      • @glimse
        link
        72 days ago

        I thought it was maybe a hard vehicle to photograph… Surely it can’t be that bad, right? Then I saw one in person and realized the photos made it look good by comparison. …

          • @glimse
            link
            62 days ago

            You can see the misaligned panels from half a block away

              • @glimse
                link
                22 days ago

                Dumpsters are really good at what they do. This thing could get away with being ugly if it was ugly by necessity

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 days ago

        They really don’t. They look like they were drawn by a 7 year old.

        My 7 year old thinks they’re absolutely great. His reasoning: “because that’s exactly how I would design it!” He proceeded to draw a cybertruck indistinguishable from the thing you see in real life. I was horrified, because it proved to me everything I needed to know about the vehicles design.

        Elon Musk drew it himself, and told the engineers exactly how to make it. And because he lacks any apparent skill, his drawing ended up looking exactly like a 7-year olds imaginary truck.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 days ago

        Yeah I mentally expected compact car size because they kind of look like those angular shitboxes from the 90s. I think they were geos? But they’re like twice as big and four times as shitty.

      • @apfelwoiSchoppen
        link
        22 days ago

        It is really the dumbest vehicle made in quite some time.

    • @reddig33
      link
      42 days ago

      A lot of people bought these cars before it was obvious who Elon was.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        The Model 3 released in late 2017, while the “Pedo guy” thing happened in late 2018, and the “420 funding secured” fraud was before the Model 3 even officially entered production. The “FSD in 6 weeks maybe” BS had been going on from the earliest Model S days, and I can give a very comprehensive list of all the massive red flags that’d been waving from when the first Roadster rolled off the line.

        I can give a pass to anything earlier than the Model 3, just because it wasn’t reported on nearly as much and I don’t expect people to follow industry news to the same degree I do, but it was still definitely there for people to see if they wanted to. However, Elon has literally always been a massive piece of shit from day 1, and it’s only gone downhill from there and especially after the Model 3 was starting production. Anyone trying to convince themselves they bought their car before that was “obvious” is coping hard.

      • @apfelwoiSchoppen
        link
        22 days ago

        Yes. Exceptions are the new model 3s and wankpanzers. All of these people knew.

    • @blady_blah
      link
      12 days ago

      I actually like Tesla. I just hate Elon more. We came close to buying a Tesla once or twice, but now it’s totally off the table.

  • @proper
    link
    172 days ago

    what sort of scumbag could own tesla stock, or even buy a tesla in the last year or more, and still sleep at night?

      • @Takumidesh
        link
        112 days ago

        If you have a 401k, IRA, company pension, or any other type of traditional retirement accounts, you likely have some Tesla at least indirectly, and while you might not have direct voting rights, you would at a minimum have ownership of funds that have ownership of Tesla.

        • @ch00f
          link
          22 days ago

          I got to vote against Elon’s insane bonus package. It passed, but felt good to vote.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          -12 days ago

          Who do you think is in charge of buying shares for those? Sociopaths.

  • FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    132 days ago

    On December 24 Tesla’s shares went up by 7%. On December 17 they went down by 8%. Movement like this happens all the time, will we get headlines for each one? Overall, Tesla’s stock price is still up 50% over the past year. I wouldn’t consider this to be all that significant a drop yet. Let’s see what happens with their upcoming product releases.

  • ✺roguetrick✺
    link
    42 days ago

    You’d think the tariffs would be a big booster for them. BYD cars would kill them, but so would BYD batteries used by other automakers.