• @notannpc
    link
    English
    122 hours ago

    Part of me is sad because some of my favorite games might get shitcanned as a result, but it’s a loss I’m willing to accept if it kills such a parasitic company.

  • @Rooty
    link
    English
    474 hours ago

    “Company fails to generate infinite revenue even after implementing every abusive tactic known”.

    • @kameecoding
      link
      English
      223 hours ago

      More like, company keeps pushing for short-term profits, runs out of goodwill built up in the past.

      • @Aurix
        link
        English
        16 minutes ago

        Ubisoft had many long standing issues, but disowning The Crew users was the worst possible move they could have made in their already dire situation.

    • @ByteJunk
      link
      English
      314 hours ago

      Unfortunately, that’s not how this works.

      This is late stage capitalism, execs are judged on how much money they managed to squeeze out before the company died. They’ll be hired immediately specifically to do it again somewhere else.

      The company dying in incidental.

    • @kameecoding
      link
      English
      53 hours ago

      Some will take the blame, take millions as parachute payments, then the low level workers will have their jobs cut.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    60
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    they MBA’d themselves into extinction

    edit; everyone with an mba is only qualified to be a farm laborer

      • @Soup
        link
        English
        194 hours ago

        There’s a world where management is treated as an important but not godly position. Where they are schedulers and arbitrators of conflict, and where they aren’t free from consequences because they’re already at the top. And holy hell it’s also not the place where the position is used to promote someone out of where they’re useful simply because paying a labourer more than a manager is seen as unthinkable. It ain’t this one, but I like to think about it sometimes.

    • @The_v
      link
      English
      456 hours ago

      Hey now, I know a bunch of farm laborers and started out as one myself.

      They are nowhere near qualified for farm labor. That requires being able to work, not just regurgitate platitudes from the most recent bullshit management fad.

  • THCDenton
    link
    English
    346 hours ago

    Get rid of uplay. I might buy ubisoft games if they weren’t tied to that horrible service

    • @CatZoomies
      link
      English
      185 hours ago

      Not just Uplay, but also their activation servers. Their games make calls to their endpoints to authenticate if you own/access the game and DLC. If those activation servers are decommissioned without a replacement, your game won’t activate and you’ll lose access to DLC.

      They announced they would do this for legacy games several years ago, and I was going to lose access to all the DLC I paid for with my Splinter Cell Blacklist game that I physically owned on a Wii U disc way back in 2013. Bought all the DLC because I loved the game. After enough gamer backlash, Ubisoft backpedaled and the activation servers remain for now. However, the concern is still there that I’ll lose the stuff I paid for when they decide they can’t serve it anymore or if they go bankrupt. Without them updating the game code or open sourcing it, I lose updates, DLC, etc.

      We need digital ownership reform, or else it’s piracy time again. This will especially be critical when Gabe steps down from Steam and new owners are appointed, or if Steam goes public.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 hours ago

    Really sad because Ubisoft can make games, good ones even. But with out the freedom or time and now talent best they can do is movie licensed games.

  • @adam_y
    link
    English
    185 hours ago

    No one could have predicted this, no one.

  • @aeronmelon
    link
    English
    376 hours ago

    Ubisoft just needs to get comfortable with no longer owning their games. 😈

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    547 hours ago

    It’s because they’re not AAA anymore. They went AAAA so I guess they’ve had a financial rating overflow and now they’ve gone negative.

    • BigFig
      link
      English
      357 hours ago

      They’ve gone plaid

  • HexesofVexes
    link
    English
    697 hours ago

    I guess shareholders got used to not owning their stock?