• Alphane MoonOP
    link
    English
    1691 month ago

    It’s like we are living in some sort of satirical, absurdist play or novel about a dystopian future.

    • @rottingleaf
      link
      English
      461 month ago

      Everything satirical and absurdist I’ve read felt very realistic.

      But again, that’s something most autists would sign under, I think.

      • @triptrapper
        link
        English
        61 month ago

        I hope you wrote this light-heartedly, because it made me laugh and helps me understand autism a little better.

        • NirodhaAvidya
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          It’s funny because it’s true. chuckles softly

    • @CosmoNova
      link
      English
      361 month ago

      Idiocracy was waaaaay too optimistic about the future.

  • Dojan
    link
    English
    931 month ago

    Get off Google. There are alternatives, Qwant, Startpage, whatever floats your boat. I swapped to Kagi and honestly haven’t looked back.

      • KSP Atlas
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 month ago

        Ddg has an AI assistant thing too, you can turn it off though

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          430 days ago

          Now that you mention it, DDG’s AI assist button is probably my most used LLM because it’s just there & available without being intrusive.

          Some web searches lend themselves well to a quick generated paragraph.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 month ago

      Haha that just sounds like a list of gibberish words! I love tech naming when it doesn’t include Copilot or a lowercase i :p

      • Dojan
        link
        English
        161 month ago

        Yeah, don’t ask tech people to name things. Microsoft has like 500 different things called “Razor.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          331 month ago

          Their newest app to connect to virtual desktops (that I’m aware of) is named Windows App. Searching for info on that fucking thing was a pain in the ass.

          • @JustAnotherKay
            link
            English
            111 month ago

            I don’t remember, was it Microsoft or just the journalists saying

            The windows app let’s you run windows apps on windows

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            130 days ago

            They should hire someone to name things there. The only worse name I can think of would be to drop the “App” and just call it “Windows”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            It was called Remote Desktop before, but some security problems, and the fact you can connect to a program running on a server (rather than the whole OS interface) … Made them rename it, most of the tech is still the same though and most guides still apply to it.

            Come to think of it, I seem to remember that the connect to an app, rather than desktop functionality was available in Windows Server 2012, so renaming it now is a delayed response at best.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              127 days ago

              Yeah replacing the previous app (which was also a shitty name btw) was why I had to look up information about it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They’re different things. The comment you’re replying to is talking about different search engines. SearxNG is a metasearch engine - it combines results from multiple different search engines together.

        Both are important. If you use SearXNG but only enable Google, it’s essentially just a proxy for Google and you miss out on most of the value of it. Some of the other search engines may have better results for some searches than Google does.

        • Laurel Raven
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Any recommendations on how to get started with that? I’ve been using it but without digging through a frankly intimidating list of configuration options, I’m not feeling like it’s really adding much value yet

    • @HollowNaught
      link
      English
      229 days ago

      I’ve been using search xng for a while now, it’s honestly really good

    • Subverb
      link
      English
      21 month ago

      Careful. I suggested kagi in another thread and was accused of being a shill.

      Don’t understand how people can pay $7 for a coffee but won’t consider paying $5 or $10 a month for clean search results.

      • Dojan
        link
        English
        130 days ago

        People can call me a shill if they want. I was curious when I first tried Kagi, but sceptical, but now I’m really happy. It’s fun to see new features make it on there, and more than anything I love that I can make the search engine work for me instead of having to faff about trying to phrase stuff in a way where I can coax what I want out of it.

        If I hate a particular website, I’ll just block it and never see it again. It’s so simple. The new “AI generated” tags on images is nice, and I hope we can see something similar for websites at some point too. Maybe flag sites that are known to use LLMs for garbage accumulation. There might already even be a blocklist for that.

      • @Darorad
        link
        English
        631 month ago

        That’s certainly a choice

        • @PlantJam
          link
          English
          111 month ago

          Zero Google AI in chat gpt, mission accomplished I guess?

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          81 month ago

          He wants to help development of “open” “ai”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 month ago

          If you ask it to find a source website rather then an explicit answer i don’t see why not.

          The internet is full of lies to begin with, i wouldn’t trust the snippets on the google search page either.

          • @5too
            link
            English
            71 month ago

            Carbon footprint - AI burns a lot more power than old fashioned search results.

            I get wanting to cost them more, but I don’t think they’ll see this use case as a cost.

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    English
    871 month ago

    So before posting anything online just say something controversial like nipples and sprinkle it around cock your text. Fuck that will definitely fucking prevent AI from ever shit reach any cunt level of consciousness.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    761 month ago

    That used to be how you would get past voice response systems and get to an operator quickly as well: just say “fuck”, once, clearly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      530 days ago

      This is true and FedEx absolutely used it. Was going through their circular automated phone system saying “Agent” and such until I started cursing. Then, I was finally directed to a person. Not sure if it still works these days though…

    • @Xanthobilly
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      Mashing 0 repeatedly works well.

  • @RonnyZittledong
    link
    English
    371 month ago

    AI controlling our lives with no humans to plead your case to is like something out of Black Mirror. I am not looking forward to this bleak dystopian future.

    • teft
      link
      English
      171 month ago

      It’s literally a plot point in Elysium.

    • @Sterile_Technique
      link
      English
      101 month ago

      That said, all it has to do is a better job at controlling our lives than the humans currently running everything are doing, and the lowness of that bar serves as a pretty accurate marker for the exact center of the Earth’s core.

      • @RonnyZittledong
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        A human can at least spot an obvious error and correct it in the system. An AI would just double down and apologize for any inconvenience in a very comforting voice with words statistically proven to lower a customers frustration level.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          and correct it in the system

          Have you dealt with any large company’s first level support these days? They’re not empowered to do anything in the system in the vast majority of cases (to be clear, this isn’t a dig at support, it’s at the companies that don’t give their staff the tools to actually do their job).

          Yes, most people can spot an obvious error, but actually correcting it in the system is usually much more difficult.

          • @Hackworth
            link
            English
            130 days ago

            On the other hand, AI can also spot obvious errors. And the more stressed out, overworked, understaffed, and generally bombarded departments become, the more people will miss obvious errors.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        230 days ago

        The reason why the humans controlling things suck at it is because they’ve cowed down people to not demand better. Accepting shitty AI instead of humans is just being cowed down even lower.

  • @eatthecake
    link
    English
    191 month ago

    I googled turn off the fucking ai and the overviews are now gone. I’m surprised it’s that easy to turn off.

  • @Uschaan
    link
    English
    171 month ago

    Complaining I was recommended by Gemini to contact Google support. When I asked for the link it replied “link to Google”.

    • dohpaz42
      link
      English
      131 month ago

      It’s been my understanding that you do not contact Google. You read their docs and you like it. Have I been mistaken?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    &udm=14 is still unknown??

    Remove all ai automatically, without having to add random profanities.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 month ago

    I like how in their slippery pizza cheese example, google’s ai referenced a really old Reddit comment about how adding glue to the cheese will make it less slippery. Lol

    • @gerbler
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      My favorite was the story of John Backflip

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 month ago

    Maybe I just don’t Google easy questions, but I have never had that AI overview give me the answer I wanted.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      It’s always answering taking the easy way out and answering a different question.

      If you give it a question with only bad answers, it’ll hallucinate a feel-good wrong answer.

  • NutWrench
    link
    English
    230 days ago

    I think the best way to make the Internet less sh*tty is to get away from Google search.

    I like the SearX search engine. It gives old-school, relevant search results, not google ranked ones.

    https://search.inetol.net/

    It’s also spread out over many separate instances, so you can pick the one that best suits your search needs:

    https://searx.space/

    • @Iheartcheese
      link
      English
      730 days ago

      shitty

      Don’t mind me just here to corrupt the children you tried to save

    • Alphane MoonOP
      link
      English
      230 days ago

      I tried two instances search.inetol.net and priv.au and I got no results for basic web search.

      But northboot.xyz worked.

      Am I missing something? How do I pick a given instance?

      • @pirat
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        In my experience, I always get much better Searx results by changing the language to the relevant one (and disable SafeSearch). However, between instances, it varies which search sources they include (Google, Bing, DDG etc.). After trying multiple, I’ve found a few instances that generally get me the results I’m looking for.

        E.g. if searching for, let’s say, something German, my URL would contain this:

        /search?q=cannabis+legal&language=de&safesearch=0
        
        • Alphane MoonOP
          link
          English
          128 days ago

          But why does the inetol instance not give any results for “android new tab” (this wasn’t what I as looking for, but I truncated the query for testing)?

          This is even though the results page states safe search if off and en-US is auto detected as the language?

          I am looking to get off regular google, but these issues are not giving me confidence about Searx.