Summary

The Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency that oversees illegal actions taken against federal workers, ruled that the mass firings of probationary federal workers (those in a trial period after being hired) are likely illegal.

The decision, affecting 6 cases, found that the terminations lacked individualized cause, violating federal rules.

OSC head Hampton Dellinger stated, “Firing probationary employees without individualized cause appears contrary to a reasonable reading of the law.”

This ruling could challenge the legality of nearly all such dismissals, opening the door for broader legal action.

  • @dellish
    link
    418 minutes ago

    Yeah, but, what are you going to do about it? Trump is above the law and Elon certainly isn’t going to be fined, let alone go to jail, over this. Courts and lawyers can cry all they want, who’s going to enforce it? Nobody, that’s who. So sure, Point out they’re doing illegal things - the law doesn’t seem to matter to those in charge any more.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    28 minutes ago

    You guys do realize this is the same type of govt that resulted in the trail of tears right? If the courts can it’s their problem to enforce it. Cause Auth Branch won’t.

    That means they need to issue Dead or Alive warrants for cabinet and elected officials (including President).

  • @dellish
    link
    110 minutes ago

    deleted by creator

  • @Becoming
    link
    English
    42 hours ago

    Gee, imagine that!

    • @Theonetheycall1845
      link
      147 hours ago

      Not a goddamn person that needs to be fired. That’s for sure.

  • @Modern_medicine_isnt
    link
    469 hours ago

    At some point, all of this is going to cost the taxpayers a lot of money in legal fees and settlements.

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      11 hour ago

      I’m pretty sure anyone coming back, or that wants to ever join again will ask for more pay due to the fuckery and uncertainty it causes.

    • @cley_faye
      link
      107 hours ago

      It will either cost a lot in legal fees, or a lot in every fucking thing is broken everywhere and most services that were already busting at the seams to somewhat operate will just pop like melons under a giant truck tire.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      219 hours ago

      Even if it does, I am certain that Musk himself will have zero legal liability here. His position is unofficial, all his authority is “because Trump says so”, and I strongly doubt he signing his name or signature on anything. That itself should scare people (even those who agree with what he’s doing), but most Americans are just sleepwalking.

      • @Jhex
        link
        128 hours ago

        If the USA had a functional justicebsystem, Musk would have been at least detained and bar from tpuchibg government systems… but alas, there is no functional law in the USA at the moment

        • @Brickhead92
          link
          68 hours ago

          Who needs the law when you’ve got money!

          Oh, you don’t have money. I guess you need the law.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4813 hours ago

      This is the exact problem. Trump and Musk are walking through the forest firing a flamethrower indiscriminately, and there are a bunch of people on the outskirts yelling “Hey, you can’t do that!”

      • @NotMyOldRedditName
        link
        31 hour ago

        I feel like using a chainsaw and indiscriminately cutting down trees might be more apt after his CPAC stunt.

        • @Rhoeri
          link
          English
          32 hours ago

          The smug entitlement it takes non-voters to think that it’s the voters that are to blame for this blows my mind.

          Especially when it was those the voted that tried to warn everyone this exact thing was going to happen.

    • @Styxia
      link
      24
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      After considering this question carefully, I expect the answer is: the square root of fuck all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1413 hours ago

      At some point all the people fired will likely get some money, some may get jobs. It probably takes at least a year for that to happen though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        912 hours ago

        Oh it’s gonna cost the government a fortune in lawsuits, people will get their salary and job back

        • @Opisek
          link
          39 hours ago

          Now that’s government efficiency.

  • Lit
    link
    38
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    So, arrest him?

    • @unphazed
      link
      2314 hours ago

      Yeah, his income level puts him on the “petty fine” tier.

      • @ZoopZeZoop
        link
        913 hours ago

        I will accept no less than 99.99% of his net worth.

        • @PunnyName
          link
          28 hours ago

          How about we chop him up into 10,000 pieces, and give you all but 1?

          • @unphazed
            link
            511 hours ago

            Wouldn’t that be 400 million? (400bil x 99.99%) Still a lot, and I could retire happily off that much for sure.

              • @tehfishman
                link
                37 hours ago

                Hilariously I think you actually both did it wrong but it’s still a shitload of money that any reasonable individual could comfortably retire with. Billionaires have so much money that misplacing a few decimal places here and there hardly even matters.

                400,000,000,000 x .0001 = 40,000,000

                https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=what+is+.01%25+of+400+billion+

                If someone dropped 40 million on me tomorrow I’d be happy to fuck off back to whatever rock I crawled out from under

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  i did 400,000,000,000 * 0.01 the second time i worked it out.

                  Not sure what i did to get 4.02 billion though

  • @andallthat
    link
    12517 hours ago

    It’s kind of funny (the sad kind of funny) that people with years of legal studies and experience have to meet and formally rule that something blatantly illegal to the point of stupidity is… well… illegal.

    “If I have a made-up position that my own government admits is not an official one, can I go ahead and randomly fire thousands of people?”

    “A ha! Good question, let’s see what my copy of The Legal System for Dummies says!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5616 hours ago

      I mean, they know it’s not “legal”, they are just testing the boundaries of judicial oversight. They are going to push boundaries and whenever they get any kind of push back they are going to scream about persecution and claim judicial over reach.

      The point is to overwhelm the system to the point of breaking and then claim we don’t need to listen to the judicial system, because look how broken it is.

      These people aren’t stupid, they’re just fascist who know things like legal systems are social contracts that depend on good will and trust to operate. If they can break that good will and trust them they can rewrite the social contract.

      It is dangerous to assume these people are just stupid.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1014 hours ago

        Just gonna quote the smart relevant alarming resharable parts of this comment

        I mean, they know it’s not “legal”, they are just testing the boundaries of judicial oversight. They are going to push boundaries and whenever they get any kind of push back they are going to scream about persecution and claim judicial over reach.

        The point is to overwhelm the system to the point of breaking and then claim we don’t need to listen to the judicial system, because look how broken it is.

        These people aren’t stupid, they’re just fascist who know things like legal systems are social contracts that depend on good will and trust to operate. If they can break that good will and trust them they can rewrite the social contract.

        It is dangerous to assume these people are just stupid.

      • @andallthat
        link
        -112 hours ago

        For what it’s worth, I didn’t think they are stupid, just that they are doing blatantly stupid, over-the-top stuff.

        On purpose? Yes it’s a really scary thought that this might be a coup in slo-mo. And I mean slo-mo just relative to the more common “army abruptly takes power” approach, but it’s still disturbingly fast.

    • @andros_rex
      link
      513 hours ago

      It’s kind of funny (the sad kind of funny) that people with years of legal studies and experience have to meet and formally rule that something blatantly illegal to the point of stupidity is… well… illegal.

      Well yeah - that’s how it works. If you don’t care about law and rules you just do shit. The people who enforce the rules have to follow them and go through processes - and by gum that’s time and work! (And who wants to do work? Definitely none of the judges and lawyers I’ve met lol)

      If they imminent domain your house to build a turnpike to siphon off money to foreign investors - that’s on you to put the time and effort into fighting it. If they run voucher programs and charter school scams that benefit their friends - well, they have other friends who often are the ones supposed to enforce the rules. They act, you have to pull yourself together and react. How can you fight an illegal eviction if you’re too busy trying to find a new place to sleep?

      It’s that old idea that the state has a monopoly on violence.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        412 hours ago

        And while you’re legally following all the rules they’re already moving on to the next thing and cornering you before you even act.

        This is your landlord illegally evicting you and then also lying to get you arrested and then paying someone to murder you in jail.

        • @andros_rex
          link
          312 hours ago

          The double bind too is that people think when illegal things happen that they get stopped, so they don’t believe that the illegal things are even happening. So many levers of justice - in the US at least - are really determined by one’s ability to get access to a lawyer or the ever increasing rarity of getting sympathetic news coverage.

          There is no justice, and then no one believes you. If the gaslighting brings you to mental illness - even more justification to pretend these things aren’t happening.

  • barnaclebutt
    link
    3114 hours ago

    But the DOGE guys are so cool. That guy is the next Tony Stark with a totally huge penis. And those children running the day to day workings of DOGE definitely slay pussy. Not punchable faces at all!

  • MedicsOfAnarchy
    link
    5816 hours ago

    So each fired employee saves, let’s say, $75,000. Then each sues the government and wins a $250,000 settlement, and gets their job back. Of course the government spends $300,000 on lawyers for each case. The savings practically leap into our pockets!

    • @straightjorkin
      link
      22 hours ago

      Don’t forget that the money isn’t going to be circulating in the economy either so those taxes are right out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2516 hours ago

      There’s also nothing efficient about firing people from various critical agencies and then scrambling to bring the back after their records have been purged.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 hours ago

        How many will not want to come back too? Or even if they do will now be looking to leave.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒
      link
      512 hours ago

      It’s an ouroborus - a self feeding problem that will always be able to Boogeyman the problem it caused. Those employees will then be painted as wasting money by tying up courts for settlements, decried like the McDonald’s coffee incident all over again.

    • @blattrules
      link
      English
      514 hours ago

      They deserve to get every penny of that too; it’s a stupidity tax.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      While the decision is limited to those six workers, its implication is that all, or nearly all, of the mass firings of probationary government workers by President Donald Trump violate the laws regulating government employment

      It’s only for the trainees at present, not sure why the title exaggerated

  • @CMDR_Horn
    link
    6617 hours ago

    I found out yesterday the government employees who received a promotion are also put on probation. Someone I know was fired after 20years of service just for the crime of being a good enough employee to deserve a promotion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3516 hours ago

      So they didn’t even just limit it to new-hire probationary employees, but also included people who just entered a new title after being an employee for years?

      So so so fucking dumb.

      If we still have a functioning government and legal system after all of this is said and done, the federal government will be paying out billions of dollars in (completely reasonable) lawsuits.

      Super efficient.

      • @straightjorkin
        link
        12 hours ago

        It’s because there would be an even bigger immediate legal shit show if they fired anyone who wasn’t probationary. They only fired who they could get their hands on right now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        313 hours ago

        It’s easy to miss that kind of thing without testing. Traditionally it’s been considered a decent idea to spend more than six seconds firing thousands of people.

    • @credo
      link
      1016 hours ago

      Was probably put on “supervisory probation” which is for all new supervisors. I.e., its not just an increase in pay due to increased skills/duties.

      I know someone in the same boat and I was wondering if they would get caught in all this stupidity as well.