• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3609 months ago

    Hey guys, listen up. The scraps Amazon is giving me are insufficient to make ends meet. UNIONS ARE THE PROBLEM!

    • @GraniteM
      link
      158
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Jesus, when you put it like that, even if Darla isn’t a robot or a paid astroturfer, she’s still making the case for unions.

      • @xantoxis
        link
        499 months ago

        Yeah the argument itself is so transparently dumb that no legitimate person would hold it; and I think the dunk tweet is pointing out that in addition to having no good argument, Amazon thinks we’re too stupid to notice the astroturf.

  • @EdibleFriend
    link
    1879 months ago

    Jesus fuck how can they be this pathetically transparent?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Amazon probably outsourcing to a PR that specializes in union busting.

      1. But the PR firm that has little technical expertise - they just know they need bots to do some astroturfing.

      2. So the PR firm outsources to an IT consulting firm.

      3. But the IT consulting firm only bids on contracts, they don’t do the actual work, so they find a subcontractor.

      4. The subcontractor may hire subcontractors. Continue this step for however many iterations the value of the contract will allow.

      5. Eventually the subcontractor hires a gig worker or an underpaid staffer to do the minimal amount of work possible.

      6. The gig worker avoids as much effort as possible, because they’re paid by volume rather than time.

      At this point the requirements may or may not be fulfilled, but the admins of each org are satisfied, so they move on to the next contract without verifying the work.

      Edit: I wrote this facetiously, but u/SpaceNoodle found a news article suggesting at least some of these accounts are legit, as backed up by a Belling Cat investigation.

    • @cm0002
      link
      20
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The Amazon employee hired to do this and is trying to fight for unions secretly: :(

    • Lath
      link
      fedilink
      159 months ago

      They’re even shafting their shills when it comes to paying a decent wage.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      There’s no reason to try any harder than this. Most people who will see this tweet won’t look at the handle or the replies - they’re read the tweet, then move on. And if they see enough of these tweets, they may just internalize the notion that unions aren’t worth it. It’s better for Amazon to make more tweets than it is for them to make better tweets. And it’s not like they’re going to see any repercussions for trying to maliciously influence their employees.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      Something similar happened when there were all of those news stories about abusive work environments at Amazon. Amazon employees spontaneously tweeting about how much they loved their jobs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1059 months ago

    My union dues are 1/52 of my yearly pay. I make $25.77 an hour in an entry level job with no education requirements. Minimum wage here is $16.55 an hour.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Well you may be making 50k before taxes, but you’re paying like a thousand dollars a year in union dues! You could instead be making 33k with no union dues, and a smaller tax burden. Think of how much you could buy with that extra thousand dollars!

      On a side note are you hiring, and how far are you from Wichita, Kansas? I don’t mind a commute

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    749 months ago

    This year because I’m a union member I get 3 paid sick days and a personal day extra, which would pay for my dues for the year twice.

    • @tourist
      link
      69 months ago

      They all have that unnatural looking direct camera stare with a vague background.

      A lot of them share that exact same smile. Not sure how to describe it

      Also feels like the camera is the exact same distance from every face.

      I’m sure if you zoom in to the original pfp, you’ll find the classic image artifacts. Probably even the website watermark.

      Using an actual unlicensed shutterstock image would feel more authentic at this point.

  • LeadersAtWork
    link
    179 months ago

    Darla there reads like a coherent Trump.

    Anyone wanna bet on it being a fake account meant to spread misleading information on unions, while appearing to be voicing legitimate concerns?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      Unfortunately for “Darla”, Amazon already pays her barely enough to scrape by. Before union dues. I’m fairly certain the union or the dues aren’t the issues “Darla” should be voicing her concerns over.

  • @Son_of_dad
    link
    39 months ago

    The cost of my union fees are vastly smaller than what I get out of my benefits yearly. My family’s medication alone makes up for it, not to mention fully covered dental. Anyone who has kids needs a union