So I’ve realized that in conversations I’ll use traditional terms for men as general terms for all genders, both singularly and for groups. I always mean it well, but I’ve been thinking that it’s not as inclusive to women/trans people.

For example I would say:

“What’s up guys?” “How’s it going man?” "Good job, my dude!” etc.

Replacing these terms with person, people, etc sounds awkward. Y’all works but sounds very southern US (nowhere near where I am located) so it sounds out of place.

So what are some better options?

Edit: thanks for all the answers peoples, I appreciate the honest ones and some of the funny ones.

The simplest approach is to just drop the usage of guys, man, etc. Folks for groups and mate for singular appeal to me when I do want to add one in between friends.

    • Jo Miran
      link
      fedilink
      618 months ago

      Y’all doesn’t get enough love. It is gender neutral and extremely versatile.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            38 months ago

            if you’re less formal

            What a fun way to phrase that. You’re not wrong but it’s making me giggle.

          • Cyborganism
            link
            fedilink
            228 months ago

            I’m under the impression that you pronounce it the same way this cat looks.

          • Resol van Lemmy
            link
            English
            28 months ago

            I still wonder why English (a Germanic language) doesn’t have its own pronoun for the plural 2nd person like German (euch) or Dutch (jullie), I think it kinda helps with distinction between talking to one person and talking to multiple people.

            The problem is… what pronoun should we choose? I think “yinz” would sound kinda cool, but nobody outside of a very specific spot in the US actually uses it (other than myself I guess).

      • I agree. It’s the plural of “you” that should be the official standard, since it disambiguates “you.” It can even be broadened to include larger groups via “all y’all,” as in, not just y’all in talking to, but all y’all in the house.

        It can replace “guys”, but not “man,” though.

        • jungle
          link
          158 months ago

          The plural of you is yous or ye. In Ireland at least.

        • clif
          link
          38 months ago

          Do you work with me? I’m in the US south and my EU colleagues love “y’all” and have started using it (ironically or not :) pretty often.

          Warms my heart.

          • The Giant Korean
            link
            English
            38 months ago

            I have no hint of a Southern accent, but when I moved here “y’all” became almost an instant part of my vocabulary.

      • Bob
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It sounds cringeworthy if you’re not American though. The standard way of saying it is “you lot” and other dialects, like mine, have “yous”.

        • flicker
          link
          28 months ago

          Here where I’m from in the US, you occasionally hear a “y’alls” and now I’m going to start using it as a cultural gap between your dialect and mine.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Where I’m from people just assume you’re a hick is you say y’all. It’s not very common in the northern, out Midwest of the US, but everywhere in the south.

      • @Purplexingg
        link
        28 months ago

        I can’t do it, I don’t want to sound like I’m from the South.

    • @ieightpi
      link
      88 months ago

      I use y’all a lot and im near Chicago

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      For those not in the US south and afraid of being judged, “all” on its own is an option.

      “Hi all” is unlikely to raise any eyebrows

    • @inb4_FoundTheVegan
      link
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Bingo. I use y’all for everything. Even the singular. It’s casual, neutral and relaxed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1158 months ago

    A lot of people use “folks” for plural.

    I feel like “guys” is fairly un-gendered but people disagree with me. Personally, I haven’t used the word “guys” to refer to anything male in what seems like forever.

    “Bud” and “fella” are good singulars.

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      298 months ago

      I used to have a maths teacher who called almost every number “guy”.

      “And this guy goes to zero, while this guy goes to infinity!”

    • @MissJinx
      link
      38 months ago

      I’m a cis woman in IT, I’m guy, dude, man, bro… I don’t really care. You can change to make a specific person feel more confortable but most woman don’t care to be dude or guy

    • @garbagebagel
      link
      18 months ago

      Bud is very rarely used for women (or at least for me), but it is one of my favourite things to hear tbh

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      0
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “Guys” is ungendered.

      Reconsider whether it’s worth being friends with people that insist on fighting over the term “guys”.

      And if you are surrounded by a lot of particularly sensitive people, just call them “friend” or “friends”. It works for people you both like and dislike. Glorious.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        88 months ago

        Sure, but as a professional (teacher) I’m not willing to put my career on the line by challenging a sensitive parent. A few years ago we were told not to use that word, and when it comes to things like that, I do as I’m told.

        • @jumjummy
          link
          158 months ago

          “Listen up you little shits”. Perfectly non-gendered!

        • FlashMobOfOne
          link
          -28 months ago

          That makes sense.

          Teachers have to do a lot of stupid shit these days.

      • @GlitterInfection
        link
        English
        38 months ago

        Modifying my language choices is literally the least I can do to make people feel more included, so anyone who can’t fathom doing that is for sure, not worthy of being a friend.

      • @mostNONheinous
        link
        English
        -4
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If you are in the Midwest, Guys is absolutely gender neutral.

        Edit: downvote me all you want guys, it won’t change the truth.

        • FlashMobOfOne
          link
          08 months ago

          Meh, people who want to fight over the term ‘guys’ are in the minority.

          They can probably just be ignored.

  • @RampageDon
    link
    888 months ago

    A wise man once said, “I’m a dude, he’s a dudes, she’s a dude. We’re all dudes. Hey!”

    • Ada
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Strange though, that when you ask most men how many dudes they’ve slept with suddenly, she’s not a dude…

      • Jolteon
        link
        fedilink
        158 months ago

        There’s a very big difference between “dude”, referring to someone you’re talking to, and “a dude”, referring to someone you were talking about.

        • Ada
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -28 months ago

          Not to me there isn’t…

          • go $fsck yourself
            link
            English
            14
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It’s like the difference between “my shit”, “your shit”, and “that shit”. You’re not actually referring to your own things as feces, or calling it “shitty”. It’s just your shit. As in “Don’t touch my shit”. But when you’re referring to someone else’s shit as “your shit” or “that shit” it’s more derogatory. Like, “clean up that shit” or “get your shit out of here”.

            The context changes “shit” from derogatory to neutral. Similarly, “dude” can be both gender specific and neutral depending on context.

            Note that people are still allowed to prefer not to be referred to as “dude”, but it’s a gender neutral term in many contexts nonetheless.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            In the '60s, I made love to many, many women, often outdoors, in the mud and the rain, and it’s possible a man slipped in. There would be no way of knowing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        78 months ago

        Ive generally always agreed with the former comment, but I’ve heard this argument a few times and it does demonstrate the disconnect well. I’ve switched it up to a simple y’all.

        • Ada
          link
          fedilink
          English
          88 months ago

          Yep. Something that can only ever mean “neutral” or “man” isn’t neutral

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        That’s just how our language works. You can also use the word “fuck” in many ways that have wildly different meanings.

        • Ada
          link
          fedilink
          English
          118 months ago

          It’s funny how “just how it works out” always leads to “neutral” words having double meanings that equal “man” but never “woman”

          Maybe it’s not “just how it works” and maybe it’s just bias…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            08 months ago

            You’re literally arguing that this word should specifically exclude women, while complaining that double meanings never include women. It makes no sense. Why wouldn’t you want to take power over the word to make it apply to women too?

            • Ada
              link
              fedilink
              English
              108 months ago

              There is no world where “Check out that dude” will mean a woman.

              It will always be “neutral” or masculine.

              And that’s not neutral.

              I have zero interest in fake neutrality

              • go $fsck yourself
                link
                English
                18 months ago

                That’s because context matters.

                “You’re shit” and “You’re the shit” mean completely different things

                • Ada
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  128 months ago

                  Of course. No one literally thinks that “dude” always means man.

                  The issue isn’t the obvious truth of the different meanings. The issue is that those different meanings aren’t neutral like they claim to be, because they rely on the idea of men being the “default” state of people.

                  There’s a reason there isn’t exactly a large number of words in use that can men “woman” and “everybody” and that’s because most men would be uncomfortable with that.

                  Yet somehow, the opposite is fine?

      • FauxPseudo
        link
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        As a former resident of San Diego I have no problem sleeping with dudes. Because everyone is dude.

        People think they’re clever when they ask “would you sleep with the dude?” My response is " bold of you to assume that I haven’t." Everyone is dude. You can try to twist things as much as you like but dude normalization reigns supreme.

        • Ada
          link
          fedilink
          68 months ago

          I was talking about the default assumptions people make when they hear the word. Your circumstances don’t come in to it, unless your claim is that most people share your experiences

          • FauxPseudo
            link
            -18 months ago

            In San Diego the default assumption of “dude” is that it can be literally anyone or any thing.

            The people there accepted this decades ago. It’s not one person’s experience. It’s a shared experience of millions. It’s a geographically specific situation with the Smurf language phenomenon. Any noun can be Smurf and everyone there understands the smurfing meaning when it’s smurfing said.

    • @Late2TheParty
      link
      68 months ago

      Out of the mouth of babes… 🥰

      I believe that sentiment was also uttered by another wise man. A man of his time. Mr. Jeffrey Lebowski.

  • synae[he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    478 months ago

    Try the following for groups:

    Hey folks, how’s it going?

    Listen up assholes!

    Greetings, gumshoes

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      I say “greetings earthling(s)” but I also like gumshoe! Also definitely adding “listen up assholes” to the rotation, my coworkers appreciate your suggestions!

    • @grue
      link
      English
      28 months ago

      Listen up assholes!

      Yo!

      • @[email protected]B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

        Yo!

        Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

        I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    438 months ago

    I’m AFAB enby, saying “you guys” and calling me “dude” is fine. Those to me aren’t gendered anymore. The people who get offended at general terms like these for groups of people need to touch grass.

    But if you’re dead set on it, embrace y’all lol. Just don’t say it with a southern drawl and you’ll be fine. It’s a fantastic gender neutral term. You can also just train yourself not to add in the “you guys” to the “what’s up” phrase, and maybe just say “what’s up with you?” “What’s up with you all?” Etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      278 months ago

      “Offended” is a bit of a strong word.

      Many trans folks are, understandably, bummed out when gendered terms that refer to their AGAB are used to refer to them.

      I don’t think there’s anything wrong with trying to avoid causing that brief moment of dysphoria. That just feels like a thoughtful and kind thing to do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        138 months ago

        It’s good that OP means well, but also there are so many of us who do not care and are not affected because we know the speaker is using a generalized term and isn’t (usually) being malicious with it. I call several of my cisgender girl friends “dude” and “bro” and I’ll call men “girl” as a joke sometimes (like, girl what are you doing?). Many of these terms simply have completely lost their original gendered meaning in a lot of contexts.

        • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍
          link
          12
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’m also on Team “these words have lost their meaning” but often feel opposite to OP’s intent

          When people go out of their way to force inclusive language to a degree that feels unnatural, and especially when I’m the only trans person in the room, it feels like I’m being singled out for my identity. It’s extra uncomfortable when they make (often incorrect) assumptions about my body while doing so.

          That said, I will also never fault someone for trying to be inclusive, and ofc always respect other people’s preferences.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          98 months ago

          That’s great, and it’s nice that you don’t have to deal with that jolt of dysphoria in those situations.

          I’m simply saying that it’s also common (and okay) to not be entirely comfortable with those terms. Especially from strangers or acquaintances.

          I don’t think seeking to reduce the linguistic pattern of male as the default is a misguided effort.

    • @cmbabul
      link
      7
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No southern drawl? Y’all is like our one positive contribution don’t take it away from those of us who ain’t bigots

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      You can also just train yourself not to add in the “you guys” to the “what’s up” phrase, and maybe just say “what’s up with you?” “What’s up with you all?” Etc.

      This is likely the best solution, but also a hard one. Thanks for the perspective though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    418 months ago

    The simplest approach is to accept language is inherently gendered, and at a certain point it is exhausting to either take offense to everything or walk on eggshells.

    I’m southern, so I use y’all almost exclusively lol