Likening people in the U.S. illegally to “human locusts,” Zuchowski wrote on a personal Facebook account and his campaign’s account: “When people ask me… What’s gonna happen if the Flip-Flopping, Laughing Hyena Wins?? I say … write down all the addresses of the people who had her signs in their yards!” That way, Zuchowski continued, when migrants need places to live, “we’ll already have the addresses of their New families … who supported their arrival!”

  • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
    link
    English
    91 hour ago

    Will I be banned for posting his address? He is a public employee so it’s publicly available data

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    101 hour ago

    Fascist piece of shit. Also, I hate this fucking ridiculous argument they take up - that people that support immigration have to put them up in their houses, personally? WTAF?

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 minutes ago

        The most depressing thing about the last 9 years or so, apart from climate doom, is discovering that fascism turns out to be extremely popular.

  • @ATDA
    link
    308 hours ago

    Is it illegal to just leave one in his yard that mysteriously replaced itself?

    • beefbot
      link
      fedilink
      65 hours ago

      Genocide types like this absolutely have cameras watching their yards

        • @InverseParallax
          link
          English
          66 hours ago

          Trespassing, possibly vandalism.

          But this is the fucker who would shoot first no matter what, so probably not a great idea.

          • @dirthawker0
            link
            146 minutes ago

            If there’s a sidewalk strip in front of his house, that would be be public property. I’d love to see a half dozen people, masked, with 3 signs apiece descend on his address while he’s at work, pop those things in quickly, and zip away. Bonus points for signage that will especially annoy him, e.g. “Sheriff Whatsy Endorses Kamala for President.”

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    489 hours ago

    Anyone else feel like we’ve returned to some era where people in positions of power no longer get punished? What the hap is fuckening?

    • @linearchaos
      link
      English
      208 hours ago

      We never really left that era, they were just good at hiding it for a while.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart
    link
    147
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Some of those that work forces

    Are the same that burn crosses.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -38
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Oh SMCF, darling, could you please come up with something more original, and while you’re at it could you make it grammatical, and maybe it could even scan and rhyme? This quotation only sticks in the mind because it’s like the most irritating commercial jingle. Might as well be Only Daisy cottage cheese will do, Satisfying and fresh, so creamy and delish…

      Edit: Some folks on the force are kissin’ Trump’s arse, while he’s smoochin’ Putin’s, with prayers for the shootin’s… Okay that’s terrible but I didn’t feel I should just tell you do do something and not even try myself

      • @halcyoncmdr
        link
        English
        218 hours ago

        Amazing how you managed to say nothing valuable with so many words, yet still made it clear you don’t know what yours talking about.

        Commercial jingle? Cottage cheese? Where the fuck do you think that quote is from or what it is referencing?

  • @Cyberflunk
    link
    1910 hours ago

    Oohhh… Condemned… Absolutely no teeth

    • @Thebeardedsinglemalt
      link
      117 hours ago

      The entire sheriff’s office got removed from providing security at a voting event. It’s not actual election day stuff, at least not yet. But the city did send a message

    • @makatwork
      link
      87 hours ago

      At least it wasn’t “slammed”.

  • @Doomsider
    link
    4311 hours ago

    And this is why popular vote may not be a good way of choosing a sheriff. It produces some truly awful pick me candidates who are more interested in political power and grandstanding than serving their office.

    Without a strong code of ethics backed up by the law people can get away with a lot of bullshit.

    This guy should resign and if not then disbarred for his conduct. It boggles my mind that elected officials have no oversight. Instead he will probably face no repercussions for othering people and denigrating his office.

    • @Fedizen
      link
      1110 hours ago

      Honestly I would prefer it be an appointment but every election there should be a confidence vote where if at least 50% of people don’t approve of them they get barred from office

      • @Doomsider
        link
        79 hours ago

        That is an interesting proposal. I think we should spend a lot more time kicking around alternatives and then trying them out.

        Surely the people who want these positions of power are rarely the ones that should have them.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
          link
          0
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          I don’t buy that whole trope about how the people that deserve power are the people that don’t want it. That may be true for such a person at first, but if they’re the sort of good person who can recognize policy failures and offer popular solutions, at a certain point it becomes them to fight against those policy failures. And if that person recognizes that public office is the best way to do it, wanting to run for office would be a perfectly natural desire.

          • @Doomsider
            link
            37 hours ago

            For sure, I mean I get what you are saying.

            You can’t deny that powerful positions attract bad actors though. How we deal with that is probably more important than sweeping generalizations like the one I made.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I like it being an elected position, rather than the police or local government appointing someone. That way if someone is egregiously against the grain of their community the community can act.

      However, like so many elected positions, there should be real minimum qualifications to get on the ballot, like a 4 year degree or equivalent experience in a related field, a neutral third party psych eval, etc.

  • @Letme
    link
    7713 hours ago

    I think this terrorist cop needs to spend some time in the state penitentiary

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      5013 hours ago

      If only

      The Ohio secretary of state’s office said it did not plan to take any action. “Our office has determined the sheriff’s comments don’t violate election laws,” said Dan Lusheck, a spokesperson for Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose. “Elected officials are accountable to their constituents, and the sheriff can answer for himself about the substance of his remarks.”

      • snooggums
        link
        English
        5013 hours ago

        Apparently threats and intimidation don’t count as long as elections are involved.

        • Billiam
          link
          1411 hours ago

          Apparently threats and intimidation don’t no laws at all count as long as elections are involved.

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        2612 hours ago

        What a chickenshit response.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1311 hours ago

        Great, so it’s up to people of good conscience to spend their time organizing to raise money and awareness in order to try and hold this sheriff accountable for voter intimidation. Instead of, you know, law enforcement. Wonderful system.

  • Optional
    link
    3612 hours ago

    Ohio revised Code Section 2909.23 - Making terroristic threat

    (A) No person shall threaten to commit or threaten to cause to be committed a specified offense when both of the following apply:

    (1) The person makes the threat with purpose to do any of the following:

    (a) Intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

    (b) Influence the policy of any government by intimidation or coercion;

    © Affect the conduct of any government by the threat or by the specified offense.

    (2) As a result of the threat, the person causes a reasonable expectation or fear of the imminent commission of the specified offense.

    (B) It is not a defense to a charge of a violation of this section that the defendant did not have the intent or capability to commit the threatened specified offense or that the threat was not made to a person who was a subject of the threatened specified offense.

    © Whoever violates this section is guilty of making a terroristic threat, a felony of the third degree. Section 2909.25 of the Revised Code applies regarding an offender who is convicted of or pleads guilty to a violation of this section.

    R.C. §2909.23

    . . . just sayin’.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      1913 hours ago

      I’m not interested in doxxing anybody, because I don’t believe in terrorism.

      But I do think this sheriff would feel very differently about having his home address tracked and shared.

      • Optional
        link
        2012 hours ago

        He could literally be any one of the “Bruce Zuchowski”'s listed on the Inerwebs as living in Portage county Ohio.

        There’s just no way to know!

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice
        link
        912 hours ago

        Yeah, an equivalent response would be for a government figure to tell the public to record these judges addresses for making the decision to call it a non threat. Which of course would be threatening.

  • TTH4P
    link
    fedilink
    1412 hours ago

    Maybe we should all record his address…