“Fidelity is currently valuing X at about $9.4 billion”

I found this funny.

  • @apfelwoiSchoppen
    cake
    link
    English
    1173 hours ago

    Honestly terrifying that they still think it is worth that much.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 hour ago

      If someone were to buy it, ban the Nazis and get advertisers to come back it’s still salvageable, I guess. The longer Musk owns it, the bigger the chance is that it’ll become the next MySpace.

    • @hushable
      link
      English
      472 hours ago

      they still own the twitter trademark, that might be their biggest asset

      • SkavarSharraddas
        link
        fedilink
        91 hour ago

        Since they don’t seem to care about it, start using “tweet” for every social media post to devalue them further.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 hour ago

      This is the stock market, the value is set by what investors think the value could be. Mostly, they’re probably assuming people would come back if he sold it. Literally everyone knows the name Twitter.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        753 minutes ago

        This actually isn’t the stock market, Twitter isn’t publicly traded since being bought.

        • @skyspydude1
          link
          English
          321 minutes ago

          Just because it’s not publicly traded, doesn’t mean that there isn’t stock nor that there’s no market. Usually, you can technically still buy/sell the stock, just not as a random member of the public on a public stock exchange like the NYSE or FTSE.

  • @Red_October
    link
    English
    15 minutes ago

    Elon Musk’s greatest personal achievement has been his tireless work and incredible effort toward disproving the myth of Billionaire Exceptionalism.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    And yet, he’s still one of the what, 5 richest people on the planet?

    He doesn’t give a shit, and neither should you (as nice as the schadenfreude might feel). He got something worth more to him than plain old money - an established propaganda platform, which he is using as he intended - to war monger and otherwise interfere in politics to ensure fascism progresses as fast as he can help it. The “dent” (more like a surface scratch) it put in his finances is completely invisible and irrelevant to him.

    And it should be to you, too.

    He is NEVER going to end up without means or power, not even fucking close, unless we take them from him, and abolish the system that encouraged and enabled him to amass them in the first place.

    • @CleoTheWizard
      link
      English
      845 minutes ago

      What is completely wild to me is that there are only 4 main apps: Reddit, twitter, instagram, and Facebook. Almost every public conversation happens on one of those platforms. And of those four platforms, one of them was bought by one singular person. Some people just don’t get the absolute scale of how much one person can just buy of our communities.

      Like it or not, there are businesses on Twitter. Celebrities are easy to reach and talk to. Even companies use Twitter for support. News outlets post there. It’s a whole community. Was it a bit toxic? Yeah. But it wouldn’t have mattered. One guy bought it.

      Similar to what you said, if you were to run the numbers on this I’m pretty sure owning twitter to Elon is not much different than owning a cable subscription to your average family. A whole community of tens of millions of people bought by one person and its success doesn’t matter. Capitalism is broken. And if you think that’s bad, imagine how he can affect your government when a Supreme Court justice goes for a small small fraction of the price…

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        14 minutes ago

        The average family’s cable subscription doesn’t cost 20% of their net worth.

      • @yamanii
        link
        English
        115 minutes ago

        Well said, after losing access to twitter it’s really hard to get information on game companies for example, since they don’t have their own blog for you to RSS and get information about the newest game updates and what not, and they only post on youtube if they have a new trailer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 minutes ago

      He’s the actual richest man on the planet with a net worth of a quarter of a trillion dollars. The next richest person on the planet is Jeff Bezos with $197B

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      352 minutes ago

      Yeah a lot of people miss the fact that the play for Twitter was never about money, but control. Owning one of the most popular social medias makes it easy to spread propaganda and amplify your voice.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113 minutes ago

    I wonder when Mohamed bin Salman will be coming for his ROI on the $22B that he gave Elon for the purchase of Twitter.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      13 minutes ago

      If that $22B prevents another Arab Spring it’s probably worth it to him.

  • @grue
    link
    English
    114 minutes ago

    If he succeeds in using it as a propaganda platform to force the US into a fascist dictatorship, he will have gotten his money’s worth.

    • @exanime
      link
      English
      122 hours ago

      No wonder he is starting to get along so well with Trump

    • Zerlyna
      link
      English
      52 hours ago

      Like his buddy Trump!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 hours ago

      that’s why he is the richest person in the world with 270B net worth.

      look, i hate the asshole as much as the other guy, but changing meaning of words and underestimating the enemy never helped anyone.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 hour ago

        it’s just that he could take big risks (not even a smart one) in investment because he didn’t care about the money, he has so much that he can never lose it all, so of course if you can invest blindly you’ll for sure win at some point

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          it’s just that he could take big risks

          yes, that is definitely part of his success. and since this strategy got him to position of richest person in the world, it is pretty clear that “genius at losing money” is not really accurate description of situation.

          as for twitter, he clearly is not in it for the money, otherwise he wouldn’t be there to begin with. he originally hoped to buy position of cheered and admired hero and when he failed, he settled for a position of hated douchebag. infamous still means people know you, i guess 🤷‍♂️

          • @atrielienz
            link
            English
            219 minutes ago

            It would appear that he didn’t want to buy Twitter and was literally forced to do so. I think for him Twitter is a temper tantrum. He didn’t get what he wanted so he’s destroying everything around him as a result.

            More to the point though, I do wonder why he didn’t just pay the billion dollars to get out of the deal (with his 270 billion net worth - which by the way includes assets not necessarily liquid cash).

            I don’t know that he’s not in it for the money. I think the point is to destroy it so he doesn’t have to pay back what he borrowed to buy it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              8 minutes ago

              More to the point though, I do wonder why he didn’t just pay the billion dollars to get out of the deal

              I don’t know that he’s not in it for the money.

              your first sentence explains he is not in it for money, if money were the concern, eating the 1b fine would be logical thing to do (i am not fact checking that 1b piece of information, i trust you on this).

              with his 270 billion net worth - which by the way includes assets not necessarily liquid cash

              that’s how it works, no one has 270 billion in cash

              I think the point is to destroy it so he doesn’t have to pay back what he borrowed to buy it.

              that doesn’t make sense, destroying twitter doesn’t absolve him of obligation to return money he borrowed.

    • @GeneralInterestOP
      link
      English
      213 hours ago

      The funny part was when he said he was a free speech absolutist, but then he started restricting the free speech of people he doesn’t like

  • @xc2215x
    link
    English
    31 hour ago

    Wow. That is brutal.

  • dinckel
    link
    English
    153 hours ago

    May it sink even lower

  • @CosmoNova
    link
    English
    83 hours ago

    If I remember correctly the evaluation of Xitter has been around $9 Billion for years so they’re basically saying it tanked only a little if you adjust for inflation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      The value of Twitter when he bought it was $44 billion. We know this because his dumb ass bought it for $44 billion.

      Regardless of what a sane person would pay for it, that was the value to him and so if the next highest valuation is $9b he lost $35b of value by overpaying.

      You do raise a good point though. Twitter used to be valued at $9b when its value was speculative and the company was growing, now that we know it’s shit and getting worse it’s almost certainly worth less than that too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 hour ago

    As long as it’s still in operation and people view it as a valid platform, its numerical value is irrelevant. I won’t be happy until it goes away or is relegated to the likes of Truth Social.