• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    89 hours ago

    Should be a law that everytime you invoke free speech on your website any demonstrable action contrary to it should result into a massive fine for lying and an automatic shutdown after a certain amount of violations.

  • JaggedRobotPubes
    link
    English
    59 hours ago

    Stupid reality keeps telling me I’m wrong no matter how much I whinge!

      • @breadsmasher
        link
        English
        519 hours ago

        the one sucking toes, or the one having their toe sucked

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        419 hours ago

        Well I assumed it was the crybaby hiding behind his mommy since it’s his chatbot.

        But now that I think about it, the manbaby in the leaky diaper is just as fragile, so it’s possible that it all started with him boo-hooing to the crybaby.

        Six of one, half a dozen of the other…

        • @PattyMcB
          link
          318 hours ago

          Yeah… his mommy had to go on tv and stand up for him

  • BlackLaZoR
    link
    fedilink
    -5819 hours ago

    X is a private company, and Musk is free do to whatever he wants there

    • JaggedRobotPubes
      link
      English
      59 hours ago

      Some people like to use words to make a point. Others prefer to use them not to.

    • dohpaz42
      link
      English
      7019 hours ago

      And we are free to give him shit about it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3819 hours ago

      Given Musks new role in the Federal Government, that may no longer be true.

      Musk censoring public discussion (either personally, or done at his direction) may amount to First Amendment violations, given he’s now a government representative (though they’re trying to argue he isn’t).

      Is modifying an AI to refuse to provide information on him, considered censoring public speech? Probably not; but he’s not ‘free to do whatever he likes’.

    • @Makeitstop
      link
      English
      1018 hours ago

      And we’re all free to call out the thin-skinned, nazi shitstain whenever he acts like a pathetic, hypocritical child. The fact that it’s not illegal doesn’t mean it can’t be criticized.

      Not that he’d be any safer from criticism if we were only allowed to mock people who break the law.

    • @GreenKnight23
      link
      918 hours ago

      I agree. but he also deserves to be called out for the hypocrisy, the lack of integrity, and failing morals.

    • @PattyMcB
      link
      618 hours ago

      True, but he’s still a whiny crybaby hiding behind mommy’s apron

    • TheObviousSolution
      link
      fedilink
      518 hours ago

      No. There’s this thing called laws and regulation, shill. Go back to the shitter of a country whose recycled garbage arguments you are propping up that just decides to label those regulations “deep state” in crayon before throwing them in the gutter. Outside of it, our governments still have a fair decent number of them and they are still holding fast against the number of idiots in their respective society that are being feed the most ignorant and reactionary form of propaganda because their governments haven’t rotted by a resounding patriotic “we are perfect, why bother with actual reform?”