• Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    gold-tier shitpost. i’m gonna spam this all over the place next time somebody brings up monogamy.

  • DarkFuture
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Is there a more frightened creature on the face of this planet than American conservatives?

    • historicaldocuments
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s not fear, it’s a mindset that starts with the idea that what they personally want is how the world ought to work. People don’t generally make public arguments that go against their own self interest. Dudebro from the OP’s screengrabs obviously has his sights set on multiple women, so he’s going to say whatever dumb shit that can drag that mindset into whatever group he considers himself to be a part of.

      Or it’s satire and this is Poe’s law in action. Dude should’ve had a winky.

    • bitjunkie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I vaguely remember learning in biology class in high school about some kind of vole that was becoming extinct because it was so high-strung that if someone yelled at it, its heart would explode.

      So no.

  • olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The three first paragraphs are actually correct and thought out. I’m surprised they got this far but then finally concluded that this is the “destruction of society”.

  • AdolfSchmitler
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Ok who’s trying to convince their wife of an open relationship? I hope they know the men usually don’t get with as many other partners as the women do. And then they get butthurt their wife is sleeping with other people even tho it was their idea in the first place.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They don’t want an open relationship. What they want is a relationship like the kings in the Bible had: one husband with multiple wives. The men get to be polygamous, but the women are still monogamous.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well, based on what this post is saying, they aren’t trying to convince their wives to be in an open relationship, they’re trying to pursue polygamy. It says “if you limit men to only one wife,” it doesn’t say “if you limit people to one spouse.” They want it one sided.

  • TubularTittyFrog
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’ve had this done to my face. Usually from ethical ENM people lecturing me on how my monogamy is destroying society and oppressing me and everyone around me and I’m an unethical person if I only want to date monogamously.

    I usually just no longer interact with such people, but that’s just me.

    • GalacticGrapefruit
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Genuinely, I tried dating someone who was poly. Watching her kiss someone else hurt in a way that I can never fully describe. I understand that that’s a me issue and not a her issue. But I can’t do it. My heart just doesn’t work that way.

      • Malyca@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s just not for everybody. We’re all different and have different boundaries and that’s totally ok. I could never do poly either, just not for me.

    • andros_rexOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      My ex used poly as a way to shop for a replacement. Watching him introduce the guy to our favorite places, start prioritizing him over me… it fucked me up. My 30th birthday and he was with him.

  • papalonian
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    219
    ·
    2 days ago

    Once marriage is viewed as an equal partnership there is no structurally distinct role for men and women.

    Therefore a man could just as easily fill the wife role and a woman the husband role. So why limit marriage to man and woman? Man and man or woman and woman is equally valid structurally

    If men and women are interchangeable and replaceable what function does gender have in a society?

    Who’s to say anyone can’t be any gender they want to be?

    This is the roadmap to societal destruction that monogamy-only causes

    We were so close!

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Therefore a man could just as easily fill the wife role and a woman the husband role.

      One of my wife’s only regrets in our marriage is that she doesn’t make enough to allow me to be a full time house husband. I guarantee I’m traditionally more masculine than all of these chuds. I would also love nothing more than to keep the house clean, cook, keep up the garden, finish remodeling the house, and pamper my beautiful wife. I unfortunately am just the main breadwinner, and we wouldn’t be very comfortable without my salary.

      I just never got how some dudes are just so fixated on their jobs being their entire identity, going as far as to base their masculinity on having a 9-5.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        I dated a girl in uni and she asked what my career goals were, and I said House Husband. She ended the relationship claiming I had no ambition.

        Fast forward to now, I have a career, but also I work from home so I do all the cooking, laundry cycles, some decorating, while also wokring on car engine rebuilds on the weekend. My wife handles the finances, and shouting at crackheads or assholes when they are causing trouble in the neighbourhood.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          that girl thinks old school, probably expects the husband to be the sole breadwinner while she likely either wont work or takes a part time job, and likely chides other people for either not working or working too little too. barring child rearing. did you ever ask if she wont spend full time taking care of a child, or she would work full time like you would?

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re living my dream and I seethe with jealousy. I should have picked a career where I could work from home. Unfortunately I work in healthcare, so I didn’t even get to temporarily live the dream when everyone else was staying home during COVID.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            i work as “essential employee” so i never stayed home, alot of people got COVID by the way, even with safety protocols. what a surprise, as soon as the lockdowns lifted, increased pressure to layoffs mounted for many industries. i heard from a friend who works in health as a technician(not directly with health related) but they held on to these employees and worked them to the bone.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              35 minutes ago

              Yeah… One of the biggest problems with our hospital was keeping providers healthy. A lot of people got COVID several times in a fairly short timespan and ended up having a lot of long term complications. We are attached to a college and are a large teaching hospital, so a lot of our attendees/educators tend to be older than your average physician.

              A lot of people do not realize how many pillars of education we ended up losing because of COVID. Just in my department we had several attendees retire just after COVID, and had a few pass during or shortly after. One of the hardest to cope with was an older gentleman who was one of the first PAs to be licensed in our state. He ended up having to be ventilated, was lucky enough to survive, but now needed to carry around an oxygen machine to do basic tasks. That kind of experience you gain from being around since the inception of a field of study is just irreplaceable.

              The sad thing is I work in orthopedics and rehabilitation, so we weren’t nearly as affected when compared to others. The only reason we were really exposed is because things got so bad anyone who wasn’t currently sick was being enlisted to help out on the COVID floors. For about a 3 week period during the peak in our state the hospital was offering overtime rates to general staff to work the floors under licensed supervision.

              Still makes me angry that people refused to wear masks, or still deny that it was a big deal. We’ll yeah, you got to stay home and learn to cook sourdough while some of the best people I’ve ever met were risking their lives to save your idiot uncle.

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Dude that sucks.

            My WFH has been for about 15 years. I used to work in an enginerring office and quit to move across country, they told me to lug my PC with me and work remotely. WTH this was an option the whole time??

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Still seething over here. I’ve heard this a couple different times from people, where they put in their two weeks and the company is just “well why didn’t you tell us, of course you can work from home”. Seems to be the only time people can get a raise or get permits to wfh nowadays is if they threaten to quit.

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  Nah, I see patients both in an out-patient clinic and patients who have been admitted into the trauma ward at the hospital. All my specialty does face to face is really hands on, so no virtual visits.

                  The other half of my job involves custom fabrication, so we have to have access to some pretty specialized heavy machinery. I basically have the least wfh job possible. The upside is there really isn’t a possibility for my job to be automated any time in the foreseeable future, so I guess I have that going for me.

  • Contramuffin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    2 days ago

    I actually thought this was a god tier shitpost until I realized this is unironic

    • andros_rexOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty much every time I open Facebook, I am getting at least one post that is unironically advocating for biblical polygamy. Usually with shitty AI comics.

      With how rapidly the U.S. is turning into the Handmaid’s Tale, it feels like this is a botted attempt to shift the Overton window into deeper christofascism.

      • mojofrododojo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        biblical polygamy

        TIL, I had no idea this was a thing. wow.

        • nickiwest
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          According to the Bible, King Solomon (the wise king) had 700 wives and 300 concubines.

          His father, David (the one who killed Goliath), had 8 wives that are mentioned in the text.

          So “Biblical marriage” could be monogamy (like Mary and Joseph) or a wide variety of polygamous options. Either way, the most important part is that women must be faithful to only one husband.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          More specific would be “historical polygamy from Biblical times.” Like, “kings and stuff did it back then.”

          Anybody who thinks that means the Bible is for this need only look at the actual Biblical accounts of the many kings therein: Occasionally wise, fatally flawed, ultimately lonely and empty despite having the world of men in their hand.

          It is not the role of man, to rule over other men.

          • mojofrododojo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            man I wish we could all just leave the abrahamic fanfic fights behind the species.

          • mojofrododojo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            sounds mormon to me lol. wait is that considered biblical even though they have their own fanfic?

      • TubularTittyFrog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        your algo thinks you’re a cultist/fundamentalist.

        or that you’re just obsessed with their content.

        • andros_rexOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It’s weird, because it also thinks I’m Muslim. All of the reels are about how to know if I’m doing wudu right.

          • Aniki@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            hasn’t islam had that kind of … “biblical polygamy” traditionally? i remember reading/hearing somewhere that men could have multiple wifes as long as they could pay for their resources. or is that just not contemporary anymore?

          • TubularTittyFrog
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            21 hours ago

            haha, my algo on youtube thinks I’m a menopausal latina woman. i get lots of ads in spanish for estrogen replacement drugs.

  • Signtist@bookwyr.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve never seen someone get so close to realizing that gender is a meaningless social construct while still being on the complete opposite side of the map. This person would be perfectly set up for the ultimate full-court shot if they’d ever actually reassess their preconceived beliefs.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Except all of those examples are from the Old Testament, which most Christians tend to pick and choose from, largely believing that it’s effectively been wiped away by the New Testament. They treat it mostly as historical text about the lead up to Jesus’s arrival, generally not as any active set of laws or rules. But it is very much a pick and choose source of hypocrisy for what different Christians consider as “still counting”. Tons of examples like this to garbage person using it to justify their bullshit.

      Also worth noting that the Christian Old Testament is from the same source text as the Jewish Tanakh, except that Jewish interpretations/translations are based off older material/translations closer to the original “source” text where Christian ones tend to be based off early translations into languages like Greek and Latin, and the Christian take on it reorganizes it roughly chronologically.


      All this to say, most Christians see this shit as the horrid backwards ancient shit it is, and these examples are mostly present in Jewish canon as well despite the ever present edgy internet atheist brigade’s hyperfixation with exclusively taking on Christianity.

      Still awful, still worth calling out, but being more informed helps everyone make better criticisms.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        largely believing that it’s effectively been wiped away by the New Testament

        Until you ask them about gay people, and then they love to bring out some Old Testament verses…

        Nah. You don’t get to say “this is my infallible holy book that is never wrong” and then clarify that half of it doesn’t count … unless you want it to count.

        • hdsrob
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          And trying to put the 10 commandments every fucking place.

    • Obituarykidney
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You think they took the time to learn all the polys? They just want to cheat on their Christian wives I bet

      • solidheron@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I doubt they know what being poly means.

        It could be that they’re trying to push some logic to cheat on their wives because it’s articulated so poorly. If they’re against monogamy that would imply open relationship or they want to fuck without being in a marriage

  • SunshineJogger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Those things shown aren’t even directly related.

    This world is too full of people who don’t bother to train or use their brains appropriately