Thomas Matthew Crooks, the suspectin Saturday’s shooting, was registered as a Republican voter, according to Pennsylvania records.

Already the republicans are dismissing his voter registration as meaningless. Here comes the “mental illness” angle.

Edit: apparently it’s not uncommon to register with the party you oppose in PA. This is going to be a fun ride.

  • @Today
    link
    2331 month ago

    My biggest hope now is that he legally purchased the gun with no background check from a maga at a gun show.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1831 month ago

      You really think that any of the cultists are going to care about what actually happened?

      Their story will be that he’s a transwoman high on legal weed who listened to woke podcasts about Gaza.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        981 month ago

        A brave and true republican boy, who got corrupted away from his family by the antifa deep state complex, he would have been such a great person, if only his parents had homeschooled him without interference from the communist atheists, and were allowed to hit him more as a child 😢

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          361 month ago

          I should have saved it but I didn’t. Someone else posted an actual MAGoo fiction about how a good kid goes to college and instantly gets a hot Black girlfriend who corrupts him with sex and Antifa ideology…

        • @TriPolarBearz
          link
          121 month ago

          Then he got the covid vaxx and the 5g nano microchips got implanted in his brain and made him a deep state sleeper agent.

      • @PugJesus
        link
        English
        271 month ago

        You really think that any of the cultists are going to care about what actually happened?

        No, but it might be enough to convince independents not to feel sympathy for him.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          321 month ago

          Up until 2016 I could pretend to myself that, when the chips were down, most Americans could tell chicken salad from chicken shit.

          • @APassenger
            link
            121 month ago

            Too many people assumed Clinton would win.

            Ergo, she didn’t. Even so, never should have been close in the states that carried it over the line.

            • Queen HawlSera
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              I sadly knew people who attended “Clinton Won!” parties, these same people didn’t vote. Complacency is a killer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          161 month ago

          Anyone independent at this point is a moron.

          Facts won’t matter. Facebook posts about deep state false flag operations will.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            61 month ago

            Anyone independent at this point is a moron.

            This doesn’t change the fact that Biden still needs those votes in order to be president.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 month ago

        Holy shit AND tried to assassinate a fascist? Why do they keep making up such fucking cool people

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 month ago

        The cultists are gonna cultist no matter what. Truth still matters even in a political and media landscape that looks to be ‘post-truth’. Don’t get me wrong, I wish it mattered a whole lot more still.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        When it was discovered Rittenhouse beat up a little girl, the story the Right made up was that the “Girl was a transgender who was spying on his sister in the bathroom!” when there’s no evidence for that claim.

    • Trump’s already not pro-gun. He passed some of the most significant “anti” gun legislation during his term. Thing is, he’s a pathological liar, so it doesn’t matter what comes out of his mouth. He’ll stay on the “pro-gun” rhetoric, and when he’s elected will enact more anti-gun legislation, especially now that he’s been on the receiving end.

      And it won’t matter, because MAGA’s gonna MAGA. He’ll lose maybe a few truly 2A-focused people, but it won’t matter because after 2024 there will be no more free elections in the US.

      • Optional
        link
        771 month ago

        Trump’s already not pro-gun.

        Point of order: Trump’s not anything except Pro-Trump. THAT’S IT. That is the sum total of his actual identifiable personal beliefs.

        He’s a demented narcissist and a sociopath. He’s a rapist, a fraud, a money launderer for human traffickers, he’s a traitor, a colluder, and a piece of shit.

        But he is absolutely NOT “not pro-gun”. He does not give a single solitary shit-in-a-vacuum. This has been proven. It Is Known.

        • @postmateDumbass
          link
          101 month ago

          Once he has secured power the gun confiscations will begin. Classic power grab move.

          • Optional
            link
            01 month ago

            Yeah that’s not going to happen.

              • Optional
                link
                21 month ago

                That was Feb 28, 2018. March 2nd, 2018, Trump met at the white house with the NRA, where

                President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence have reassured gun owners that they remain committed to “strong due process” and they “don’t want gun control.”

                He’s a chattering, demented, adderall-swilling dipshit who will not shut the fuck up and is literally unable to not lie every few sentences. It meant nothing, and even if they did try anything, that would be the fastest way to destroy the MAGA base.

                Not. Happening.

    • @RememberTheApollo_OP
      link
      301 month ago

      He was a responsible gun owner. They’re all responsible gun owners.

      Until they’re not.

    • @Delusional
      link
      401 month ago

      Yup even if it turns out it was the father of one of the children trump raped, they won’t care.

    • @LordCrom
      link
      111 month ago

      MAGA will spin this… He was a plant, he was hired by Biden, he was a sleeper agent meant to sow discord in the GOP…

      Whatever fox does with this story, the MAGA people will believe it.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        He was hired by Trump to miss, but “make it look good”, and killed for being a “loose end”

  • Ioughttamow
    link
    fedilink
    120
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Conservatives when a poc is convicted of rape:”if that was my daughter I’d happily be in JAIL now!”

    Conservatives when their violent , rapist prez gets shot: “this is the democrats fault since they call him a fascist, let’s pull back the violent rhetoric peeps”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      331 month ago

      Only that the “let’s” is referring to only Democrats. Republican/alt-right people will continue to use violent rhetoric.

  • @RememberTheApollo_OP
    link
    991 month ago

    Crooks was supposedly wearing a shirt for a YT channel “Demolition Ranch” being called a pro-gun channel by the news. Quick scan of their content seems to indicate that guns are toys to be played with and how much destruction you can do with them.

    • NoIWontPickAName
      link
      fedilink
      331 month ago

      That’s one I had to stop my kid from watching because their gun safety is not non existent but is also not safe at all

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      251 month ago

      IIRC, DemoRanch uses (or at least used to) a portion of its income to run his Veterinarian clinic, but that is a few years old and it looks like he stepped back from the business in 2021? I fell off from most of YouTube before the pandemic, so I’m bummed but not surprised that he’s a Trump guy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        301 month ago

        Basically every single gun nut youtube is inherently right wing. Any content creator who actually gives a shit about humanity would have made MASSIVE changes following… ANY school shooting.

        The best you can hope for is channels like Forgotten Weapons where Ian actively refuses to “be political”. He still lets his biases show any time he talks about legislation but he also has very clearly mocked a lot of the “loophole” devices and mostly comes across as a rich jerk talking about engineering. Or (funny enough) Carl at InRange who is 100% in the “useful idiot” category but seems to have a good heart.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          191 month ago

          The YT algo also drives the content further right. I keep getting recommended Herrera’s channel, and if that’s the kind of stuff you’ve got to compete against for views, it’s just going to create a runaway phenomenon. If a tech literate, vaguely media literate leftist with a “mechanical porn” fetish can’t stop getting recommended Right-wing political gun garbage, then the average viewer doesn’t stand a chance…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            A lot of that is less the algorithm and more the creators.

            I Did A Thing/Boy Boy are as (obnoxiously) tankie as it gets and they literally did a “let’s shoot some kids with a drone” video using herrera’s guns*. Which means that basically an entire chunk of maker youtube now has an actual palpable connection to herrera.

            Everyone wants to blame the algorithm and… it is fucked. But the reality is that these youtubers (and twitch streamers and so forth) are all businesses first and most have zero problems collaborating with a known evil if it makes them money.

            I suspect it is why people like Simone Giertz and Xyla Foxlin have basically stopped all collaborations with people who aren’t part of their “inner circles”.

            *: Well worth looking up the “drama” around that. On Boy Boy, Aleks (?) tore into the gun fetishism and basically painted him as a kid with toys who got made if anyone even thought of taking them away while highlighting how fucked it is that some of herrera’s favorite guns are literally what drove Aleks and his family out of his home country. The response was herrera throwing a shitfit and insisting that anyone who enjoys shooting guns can’t be pro gun control and they are liars.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              Wasnt Herrera part of a sons of the confederacy organization years ago? You really expect someone like that to be smart. Anyways I find it funny when dipshits throw a fit about pro guns folks being in favor of some amount of gun control. Like im in favor of a basic training course at government funded ranges for example. Nothing fancy just a course on firearm safety and cleaning viola heres the card letting you buy.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 month ago

                I genuinely hope this was manufactured drama. Because I can’t imagine ANYONE dumb enough to let a couple of infamously tankie youtubers (whose claim to fame was flying out to North Korea for a day trip and insisting it isn’t that bad…) do a school shooting weeks after Uvalde with actual child cardboard tagets using his guns and his range and then being surprised by the outcome.

                Like, even Michael Reeves pulled out of that video. And that is a kid that EVERYONE is amazed hasn’t been cancelled for some stupid joke at this point.

          • @shalafi
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            I disagree, though it seems to happen to everyone else. Right-wing content is vary rare for me even though I’m subbed to lots of gun channels.

          • Queen HawlSera
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s weird how on Youtube survivors of Sexual Assault are blacklisted for saying the words “Sexual Assault”, but PragerU goes “We should bring back slavery and kill the gays!” every five minutes and get pushed to the front of my feed despite the fact that I mostly look up gaming trivia, not Right Wing shilling, meaning the algo shouldn’t be recommending it to me.

        • @grue
          link
          English
          101 month ago

          The closest thing I can think of to a non-right-wing gun nut YouTuber is Adam Savage. If course, most of his gun nuttery is centered on movie props, not real firearms.

        • @shalafi
          link
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Or Paul Harrell or,

          Massad Ayoub or,

          Hickock45 or,

          James Reeves or,

          Honest Outlaw or,

          Black Powder Maniac Shooter or,

          MidwayUSA or,

          Royal Armouries or,

          Garand Thumb.

          And those are only ones I’m subscribed to.

      • Transporter Room 3
        link
        fedilink
        211 month ago

        I bailed on his channel when he started making comments about the George Floyd protests in his videos. It was always pretty clear what his beliefs are from a religious and political standpoint, but up to then, he never brought it into his videos.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 month ago

      I think the channel is hilarious.

      I also think the channel shows off WAY too much reckless, butthole puckering lack of safety. I’m actually surprised no one has gotten injured or killed.

  • @just_another_person
    link
    67
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I don’t mean this in a conspiratorial way, but I would not be surprised if this kid was a huge Trump fan. What better way to pump up the MAGA crowd than more bullshit to make it seem like some shadowy force was trying to stop him.

    Right now the FBI has all of his friends and family in custody for interviews, the NSA is pulling all the comms info they have on him, his phone company is pulling what they have to provide…his entire life is going to get taken apart in very short order. What we actually get to see of that data probably is very little. I really hope what we need to see is disseminated quickly to not make the situation more murky.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      331 month ago

      If it was a leg shot or a deliberate miss I could go for the conspiracy angle. But as it stands he was inches away from taking trumps life, which does not scream trump supporter to me.

      • TheRealKuni
        link
        English
        171 month ago

        Apparently he was hit by shattered glass from the teleprompter being shot, not grazed by a bullet.

        (Not that I buy the conspiracy angle. I think it makes far more sense that we have a dangerously polarized society and a lot of seriously unhappy young men who don’t know what to do with their anger. That leads to violence.)

        • @SirMcCheese
          link
          21 month ago

          The glass thing was to my knowledge reported by TMZ though more recent reporting does say the bullet grazed his ear.

      • @dragontamer
        link
        English
        91 month ago

        A shot to the leg can cause significant bleeding and is often more deadly than say… headshots (see Gabbie Giffords).

        Trained gunmen / soldiers shoot for the center-of-mass. In fact, its clear that Trump wasn’t struck by a bullet now but instead by glass shards. So some glass deflected the bullet out of the way.

        • @psycho_driver
          link
          61 month ago

          Or the kid was just shooting at the teleprompter. Maybe he didn’t intend to shoot Trump. We’ll never know.

          • xerazal
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            He was secretly trying to save trump from the sentient teleprompter

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 month ago

          I know a guy who survived being shot in the head, he says doctors told him only 5% of people shot in the head survive and less recover as well as he has (he has minor issues, you’d never know if he didn’t have a dent and some metal in his skull.) Sure you can easily hit an artery in the leg and leg shots are for sure deadly too, but I wouldn’t say head shots are less deadly lol.

          The training to aim center of mass is mainly because it is larger, if you’re familiar with The Patriot you may remember the scene where Mel and his small kids shoot at the British, he illustrates this point by saying “Remember, aim small miss small.”

          Aiming for a larger target means you’re more likely to hit the target, and yes in modern times it means you’re more likely to get proper expansion of a hollow point, which means you’re less likely to shoot through him into a bystander. It also does just so happen that the A zone contains the heart and lungs, which are vital organs much like the brain. Head shots are “more deadly” if you hit, center of mass is more likely to hit a vital area rather than miss simply by virtue of being larger.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -11 month ago

          I would imagine that the secret service men would have tourniquets and similar on hand to stop the bleeding.

          • @dragontamer
            link
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            That’s a lot of Hollywood bullshit about guns in your understanding of the world. I’d recommend that you stop watching movies (maybe even cartoons?) and instead read up on actual tactics and some physiology.

            A fat, elderly, unhealthy 78-year-old-man could die from a heart attack from the tourniquet alone. Anyone taking shots at Trump at this age is going for the kill. There’s very, very few areas that are non-lethal, and those few areas are exceptionally difficult to hit 300meters away.

            EDIT: A skilled marksman should be able to reliably hit someone at those ranges with an AR15. The kid fortunately wasn’t a skilled marksman. But even a skilled marksman won’t be aiming to do a Comic-book level or Hollywood level called shot to a non-lethal area at these ranges.

      • @just_another_person
        link
        11 month ago

        Read my comment again. The FIRST sentence specifically says I’m not going that way with my comment…

    • @RememberTheApollo_OP
      link
      181 month ago

      There’s apparently a video of him saying he hates trump and republicans. It’s getting messy.

      • OsaErisXero
        link
        fedilink
        371 month ago

        That was by a lookalike from 4chan I thought, the blue shirt video?

        • @just_another_person
          link
          261 month ago

          There’s certainly going to be absolutely no end to that bullshit as well.

          • Optional
            link
            131 month ago

            Corporate News Sewers: “Well there’s only one thing for it. MORE POLLS!!!”

        • @kescusay
          link
          161 month ago

          What’s surprising is how unsurprised I am by that shit. I didn’t read it and go, “No way, no one would do that!” Nope. As soon as I stumbled on it, I thought, “Well of course the chuds on 4chan did that.”

        • @RememberTheApollo_OP
          link
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yeah, blue shirt in the car.

          That would be really bizarre if a dude that looks so much like the shooter was able to whip out a video so quickly. The only thing I couldn’t quite tell was that images of the shooter looks like he has an underbite almost, and the vid clip guy looks more normal.

          Edit: found it. Allegedly someone called Maxwell Yearick?

          E2:… ok. So looking up Maxwell Yearick gets things a little confusing. There are nsfw images of the deceased shooter that definitely look like he has the slight underbite/protruding lower jaw. Yearick is a protester who was arrested at a political demonstration and I don’t think he looks like the video guy at all nor do I think he looks like the deceased. Blue shirt guy looks closest, but we’ll have to see what shakes out of that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I won’t be surprised if they will use generative AI to spread disinformation as well

            They can make the shooter say and do more or less anything, even if it’s not true

    • @suction
      link
      31 month ago

      So we should all watch Rogan and infowars because those guys will figure it all out just by “asking questions” /s

  • @Suavevillain
    link
    601 month ago

    Republican voter and somehow this will be blamed on everyone else.

    • @Rapidcreek
      link
      251 month ago

      “Missed to the left, therefore a leftie”

      ~ Maga probably

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        37
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        He was 20. He could have voted only in a single election. Someone said he donated to democrats 3 years ago. This math is confusing the fuck out of me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          141 month ago

          Unfortunately I think what we’re going to learn is that he’s one of those people that register Republican to vote in their primaries to choose the weakest candidate giving Democrats a better chance.

          Either way I unfortunately think this is going to give Trump yet another boost… God knows that’s what we needed…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            131 month ago

            That’s possible. Because we damn sure aren’t going to learn that people are more complicated than a simple black & white label.

            If this comes across as argumentative, I don’t mean it that way. It’s just pure cynicism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            I read a snippit that in PA, it’s not uncommon to register for the other party. More than likely, he really was a dem/non repub.

            • @dragontamer
              link
              English
              51 month ago

              He’s pro-gun and we can point out the dangers of that alone.

          • @DarkCloud
            link
            161 month ago

            With just the same first and last name, where as the Republican party registration had other corroborating data, such as middle initial, address, and date of birth.

            So the donation is nowhere near as solid as the Republican party registration.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
            link
            English
            81 month ago

            Fox News: “Biden campaign received illegal campaign donation from shooter.”

        • @dragontamer
          link
          English
          31 month ago

          20 year olds don’t have wealth to reasonably donate to an election.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 month ago

            17 year olds, supposedly. (I can’t verify the three years ago, so grain of salt.)

            This doesn’t really make sense and we might just have to wait for actual details from the investigation.

            • @dragontamer
              link
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Some people are saying $10, which is a lot more to a kid than to an adult. But kids can afford $10.

              EDIT: $15 to more reliable sources. Still in the rough ballpark tho

            • @jeffw
              link
              2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              NYTimes, so there’s a paywall. It links to the FEC (wouldn’t load on mobile for me but the FEC page did fully load on my desktop).

              https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/politics/trump-gunman-thomas-crooks.html

              Edit: actually, the article has been updated since I read it. It no longer links to the FEC, just a NYT screenshot:

              https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/fe91e6ba36695009/ac182c3a-full.pdf

              Though it says Pitt, the zip is a Bethel Park zip

              voter-registration record showed Mr. Crooks’s Republican registration, though federal campaign-finance records show he donated $15 to the Progressive Turnout Project, a liberal voter turnout group, through the Democratic donation platform ActBlue in January 2021.

              • @DarkCloud
                link
                4
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Where as the Republican party registration has other corroborating information listed, the donation doesn’t have anything other than the same first and last name. So it’s not confirmed to be the same guy yet.

                • @jeffw
                  link
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Name, job, and zip code. Find me another guy living in Bethel Park with the same name who was unemployed in 2021 (edit: Bethel Park has 4 zip codes, so not even all of Bethel Park. People really think there’s another guy with such a unique name in town? None of his relatives share the same name, so an unrelated guy?)

              • @kromem
                link
                English
                -11 month ago

                The street address is registered to his father.

                • @jeffw
                  link
                  11 month ago

                  He lives there too. Without doxing anyone or putting their info on here, you can read in the news that they all live together (dad, mom, son. Sister moved out a couple years ago)

  • @foggy
    link
    561 month ago

    The mental illness angle will be met with

    “Interesting how he so easily acquired a gun.”

      • @recapitated
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        What’s an AR type?

        Edit: right answers only

        • @RememberTheApollo_OP
          link
          20
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Armalite Rifle, Armalite is still a maker of military rifles. The AR-15 is a rifle that was pitched to the military by armalite, then re-designated the M-16 by the military when it was adopted. The civilian version retained the -15, and is incredibly popular with gun owners because of the number of components made for it making it very customizable. It is also the one most often referred to as an “assault rifle”, though that isn’t what “AR” stands for.

          So to sum up, the “AR type” means that it’s likely a variant of the -15.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          “AR” refers to a pattern of rifle. Any manufacturer can produce complete rifles or various components and accessories that fit the AR pattern. Those components are interchangeable. This allows you to customize your rifle to your current and future needs simply by swapping parts, rather than needing a gunsmith to machine and fit them.

          “AR” is to guns like “Pickup truck” is to cars. A pickup might be a simple, ordinary vehicle. It might be a heavily customized rock crawler. It might be a lowered and styled cruiser. It might have a ladder rack, or have the bed swapped for a maintenance truck, or flatbed. It might be converted to repossess vehicles, or fight brush fires. Likewise, an “AR pattern rifle” refers only to the most basic structure of the rifle rather than a specific gun.

        • @dragontamer
          link
          English
          -20
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          A gun that’s more accurate and can shoot longer distances.

          When bullet goes faster, it is more accurate and deals more damage. In the 90s, the AR-15 was banned but today its allowed and has been the gun of choice in pretty much every mass shooting of the last decade.

          • Transporter Room 3
            link
            fedilink
            111 month ago

            more accurate and can shoot faster

            Than?

            Go on, you started out so strong.

            It IS more accurate and shoots faster than a gun that’s less accurate and shoots slower.

            Beyond that, you haven’t said anything about it, and you’ve not only just clearly shown you can’t be objective when talking about them, you’ve given just… So much bullshit and called it “information”

            Bullets going faster doesn’t mean more damage, or more accuracy. It can mean more penetration into things, but that’s not a given.

            It has never been banned in any meaningful way country-wide

            It has been the front and center firearm of every shooters arsenal on the news whether it was used in the shooting or not, specifically because it cosmetically looks like a military rifle. In fact the most common used things aren’t even rifles, but handguns.

            Functionally it’s no different than several other firearms, some of which even shoot the exact same round, but nobody focuses on those because they look like a hunting rifle.

            This country needs mountains of reform, including tons of changes to gun control, but what you are doing is not helping that goal in any way.

            Be better.

              • Transporter Room 3
                link
                fedilink
                31 month ago

                “these guns that are different than a completely different kind of gun that nobody brought up before this particular comment are completely different!”

                Your grasp of the obvious amazes me.

                Do you always resort to ad-hominem when called out for thoughtless comments?

                It’s still not a good look, dear.

                • @dragontamer
                  link
                  English
                  -14
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  “these guns that are different than a completely different kind of gun that nobody brought up before this particular comment are completely different!”

                  You’re talking about the fucking 1990s style Assault Weapons Ban.

                  And suddenly its unfair for me to bring up mass shootings that took place during that ban, and compare them to the AR-15 (aka: how mass shootings happen today).

                  Got it. You’re a dipshit who was hoping that I was some kind of ignorant dumbass. You guessed wrong. Learn history next time before you challenge random people online.

                  Do you always resort to ad-hominem when called out for thoughtless comments?

                  I resort to ad-hominem after its become clear that my debate opponent is a dumbass who couldn’t follow my earlier words. Because the discussion is over and I’m not debating anymore. You were too ignorant to follow my earlier points and are now fucking pwned.

                  I directly referenced 90s mass shootings. Of course I’m referencing Columbine, or are you also ignorant of the 90s or some of the most important mass shooting events of my childhood?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            101 month ago

            It also has a shoulder thing that goes up, right? Your ignorance is on full display here.

            Don’t answer questions you don’t know the answer to.

            • @dragontamer
              link
              English
              -10
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I don’t need to use technical terms like 556 or 7.62 rounds or rimfire to prove I’m a knowledgeable gun owner.

              When the other guy doesn’t know what AR means, I must bring down my language and remove technicalities. What I said earlier is the gist of the argument, we all expect the shooter to have some variant of AR-15 given the range and number of shots taken.

              The important tidbit, politically speaking, is that this gun was literally illegal to own in my childhood. Do you disagree with me on that?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 month ago

                To prove you’re a knowledgeable gun owner you should probably refrain from framing the AR-15 as a good long range weapon. It’s passable, but not what one would pick for a long range shot.

      • @ValorieAF
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Funny how? ARs are the most common and versatile rifle in the country. How is it any surprise that’s what he was using? Any gun owner in the US will likely have at least one AR.

        • @RememberTheApollo_OP
          link
          41 month ago

          Funny that so many conservatives love the AR and one was used to shoot at their President. Maybe irony would be a better choice of words. Not sure where you get “any gun owner…at least one…” I know plenty who have zero and no need of such a tacticool fashion accessory.

          • @ValorieAF
            link
            English
            41 month ago

            I mean, sure? But it’s not just conservatives who own ARs. Look at leftist gun community / subreddit posts, literally everyone likes ARs, not just conservatives. Hell I’m a lefty with an AR and I have lefty friends with ARs. It’s not that far fetched of an idea dude.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 month ago

      What’s even better, he was already on secret service/security radar when he tried to enter the metal detectors by acting weird.

      Why the fuck wasn’t he literally followed at that point?

      • @daltotron
        link
        111 month ago

        I mean they probably get like a ton of people who enter the metal detectors and act weird. I don’t really expect that to actually be a part of their security that’s reliable or useful in really any way, it’s TSA security theater shit.

      • @suction
        link
        -31 month ago

        Asking this stuff will get you banned

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    531 month ago

    He definitely could be Republican and I would not dismiss it at all. However, in the state of Pennsylvania it’s common to register for the party primaries of the opposing party whose candidate is someone you’re not in favor of and vote for someone else. It should be clear this does not mean he’s not a Republican or imply that he might be a Democrat. It’s only to add some context.

    Source: https://ballotpedia.org/Primary_elections_in_Pennsylvania

    • @quixotic120
      link
      301 month ago

      I wouldn’t say it’s common, that’s misleading. some people do it, probably, but I’ve lived in PA for 2 decades and have never met anyone who has claimed to do so nor have I seen any actual statistics on the matter

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
        link
        English
        51 month ago

        My older sister has been doing it since the 80s. I don’t think there’s very many of them because assholes keep winning the Republican primaries

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        As much as I’ve heard this parroted in multiple places since yesterday, I think this is just a talking point to edge towards it. In another couple of days it wont be maybe. It’s directed to make it a left vs right, while, what’s so outrageous about him being Republican and not liking Trump? It’s not like there hasn’t been a huge divide in the Republican party, so much so that we have the “alt right”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s fair, you’re right as I haven’t seen statistics either. While I don’t do it myself, I’ve seen many speak about doing this over the years though I’ve only lived in PA for a little over a decade.

        Edit: autocorrect

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 month ago

      He also has donated to Democratic cause three years ago. Might not mean anything but we’ll see if they better figure out this guy.

        • @dhork
          link
          English
          25
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          If law enforcement sees a guy on a rooftop with a gun threatening a crowd of people, though, that’s an acceptable situation for “shoot first, ask questions later”. That shot that killed the guy probably saved other lives.

          • @ABCDE
            link
            -501 month ago

            Non-lethal shots are a possibility.

            • NoIWontPickAName
              link
              fedilink
              371 month ago

              They also allow people to keep shooting.

              That is some Hollywood shit, in real life you shoot until the threat is neutralized, it could have been another las vegas

              • @ZoopZeZoop
                link
                141 month ago

                Yes, one of the rules of gun safety is that you don’t point your gun at anything you don’t intend to kill.

              • @ABCDE
                link
                11 month ago

                They usually don’t. See: Europe.

                • NoIWontPickAName
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 month ago

                  Ok, well you feel free to try and wound someone in that situation if you’re ever in it, hopefully no one else dies because of it.

            • teft
              link
              251 month ago

              No one in the history of actual combat shooting is taught to take non lethal shots. Ever.

              • @Mog_fanatic
                link
                131 month ago

                Idk what your talking about. You shoot the gun out of the hand. Then you shoot the hat off for intimidation and the somewhere nearby you shoot the rope of someone getting hanged to free them to kinda balance things out. This is all common sense.

                • teft
                  link
                  9
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  I cannot argue with your rootin’ tootin’ shootin’ logic.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 month ago

                What do you mean with combat shooting? Because here in Finland police is trained to (and required by law) to try to minimize the damage and if possible, to stop someone without killing them, usually by shooting at the legs etc. But that’s more for knife fielding attacker and other situation where such shots are more possible and not when the cops or others are being shot at

                • teft
                  link
                  11 month ago

                  I mean US military and police training.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 month ago

                There was an era where some cops were trained to shoot at limbs but even cops knew to ignore that shit.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  It’s the normal procedure here in Finland to try to take someone down with shooting in the legs or somewhere else that they might survive from. Not the case if they start shooting of course, it’s more for situation where they’re wielding a knife and coming for the cop or someone else

              • @ABCDE
                link
                01 month ago

                Combat shooting? It’s not a warzone. Come to Europe, mate.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              201 month ago

              Non-lethal shots are a fantasy.

              You have plenty of blood vessels in your limbs and it is very easy to bleed out via the femoral artery or whatever else. This is literally why tourniquets exist

              Assuming it is an actual threat and not a black kid with a toy train: Shoot to kill and then, when it is safe, have EMTs try to keep them alive.

              • @ABCDE
                link
                -31 month ago

                Not in the real world they’re not.

            • @dhork
              link
              English
              31 month ago

              If you’re standing 20 feet in front of the guy, yes. If your only shot is across a field from one rooftop to another, you have much less control over where the bullet hits.

              • teft
                link
                9
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                At those distances (200-300 meters going by the map i saw) with professional shooters they can put multiple rounds inside of a spot the size of a dime. That isn’t the point though, you shoot to kill in those situations. Non lethal shots are hollywood shit.

                • @ABCDE
                  link
                  01 month ago

                  Or what happens in places outside of the US.

              • @ABCDE
                link
                11 month ago

                Is that what happened?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              They’re less lethal, not non lethal, and they’re frequently used as an excuse to escalate violence needlessly. I’m very critical of the use of their use of force and would generally prefer police to be unarmed, but this is not a situation where I have any complaints. That threat needed to be neutralized as quickly and effectively as possible. Overwhelming force was the best way to do that.

              • @ABCDE
                link
                11 month ago

                Was overwhelming force used? It sounded like one person going up a ladder and retreating, before the guy got shot(s) away.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          Dunno how they would’ve done that, wasn’t he shot from another roof by a sniper while he was still posing an active threat? That’s the image I got from some articles

  • @expatriado
    link
    481 month ago

    just another case of Republican on Republican violence

  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
    link
    45
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    He probably is a registered Republican. He’s a kid. His dad probably made him register Republican. His dad bought him the gun.

    What are the odds he hates his father and blames Trump for turning his dad into a soft-brain conspiracy-minded dumbass, filled with hate?

    • @voldage
      link
      101 month ago

      Listen, while I don’t know exactly what his circumstances were, I agree he probably didn’t like the convicted felon, alleged by victims child rapist and ex president Donald Trump. I share that hunch with you.

    • @SupraMario
      link
      31 month ago

      The guy was 20…he is an adult.

      • @LordCrom
        link
        81 month ago

        Old enough to vote …to young to drink. He’s still a kid in my book until he can buy a round at the bar

      • @nomous
        link
        11 month ago

        Nah I’ve been told here on lemmy that 20yr olds are kids.

        But I’ve also had comments removed for being “ageist” for pointing out 20yr olds have virtually no life experience.

    • @frog_brawler
      link
      551 month ago

      Can’t have homeless people or people with limited means actually voting. A republican would never win again.

    • OsaErisXero
      link
      fedilink
      261 month ago

      For primaries, parties may close their primaries to only registered members of the party to vote in

    • @Snapz
      link
      91 month ago

      republicans need barriers for people of color, poor people and young people traditionally to avoid full participation in democracy. In this modern time, some states actually still require you to print paper applications and mail them to your Secretary of State’s office at the post office with a physical stamp to register to vote… The list of individual barriers to completion within those seemingly small actions can not be overstated, especially to young people who on average don’t own home printers and may have literally never bought a stamp or mailed a physical letter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      Any time you apply for a driver’s license or whatever, you are asked if you want to register with a party. That is the party that you will vote for in the primary elections. Some (many?) states offer same day registration which, in my opinion, is how it should be. It puts you in a database in case voter fraud ACTUALLY happens (insanely rare) where they can check to make sure Ur Quell only voted once and investigate what happened if they see multiple votes.

      As for the primaries: This is how the US handles our version of Ranked Choice and… I kind of prefer it (with some major caveats). The general idea is that all right wing politicians should run for the republican seat and all sane people for the Democrat seat. You campaign at the tail end of the previous year and the party members vote on you in the spring. There is definitely some sketchiness with super delegates (although, that is not overly dissimilar from how many parliament systems pick a Prime Minister), but this creates a unified front come November.

      Yes, two party systems are bad, but that is what things tend to converge on when push comes to shove. Just look at France where the Left more or less unified to stand a chance against fascism.

      Like almost every aspect of the US government: it is a fundamentally good system that needs to be iterated on and better taught to the populace. It is just that republicans know that education hurts them and want to take advantage of all the loopholes that Tommy Jefferson obviously intentionally wrote while he was raping his plantation full of slaves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      You can register as Unaffiliated fwiw, you don’t have to choose Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, or Independant. It’s mainly a choice of which primary to vote in anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -11 month ago

      Its for the parties themselves.

      But to answer your question, theres intentionally no list of citizens. The only way to verify that they can vote is registration, unless you want a passport or birth cert or whatever

  • @p5yk0t1km1r4ge
    link
    261 month ago

    So, can we get celebrate this patriot like they celebrate Kyle bitchenhouse?

    • @RememberTheApollo_OP
      link
      101 month ago

      Yeah, let’s not elevate idiots to a pedestal - and I’m not calling him an idiot (just Rittenhouse), we don’t know squat about him yet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 month ago

      Atleast this one had the balls to go after someone more secure than a bunch of random protesters.

      • @p5yk0t1km1r4ge
        link
        21 month ago

        True but didn’t him shooting two innocents after Trump make this a bad thing?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 month ago

              That is correct response for folks who arent bloodthirsted or otherwise accepting of the concept of collateral damage. Which puts ya peg over where I am, but I also think that the bombing campaign on Japan during ww2 was too lenient, that includes the nukes.

    • Queen HawlSera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Considering Trump can now campaign on being an assassination survivor and win with that? Lol no

    • Liz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      I highly suggest everyone in this thread read Angry White Men by Michael Kimmel. HIGHLY suggest you read it to understand the kind of person in America that does this and why.