• Trump and his supporters are slamming Joe Biden for quitting the race and endorsing Kamala Harris.
  • Some members of MAGA world are bemoaning the millions of dollars spent running against Joe Biden.
  • Biden’s withdrawal also means Trump is now the oldest candidate in the presidential race.
  • Flying Squid
    link
    2932 months ago

    Incidentally, there’s a bunch of people on Lemmy really mad that they can’t tell everyone not to vote for Biden anymore. They’ll tell us not to vote for whoever is going to be his replacement though.

    • Billiam
      link
      1292 months ago

      Eh, their new dissent orders seem to be “Biden can’t appoint Harris! I didn’t vote for her!” which, of course, displays a total lack of knowledge about what primaries are and what the DNC is.

      They didn’t want Biden to run, and now they mysteriously don’t want the person most of the party supports to run either.

      • @DxK
        link
        88
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Right? It’s almost as if they’ve never been approaching any of this in good faith.

        • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
          link
          8
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You’re telling me someone would just go on the internet an lie?

          It’s a massive social hub with influence on all the worlds information. What possible motivation could someone have try to influence people by faking accounts and make bad faith arguments?

          Sorry, it just doesn’t add up. Now, you’ve interrupted me hitting myself in the head repeatedly with a hammer and this brain damageisnthgomr e

      • @Sanguine
        link
        25
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The uptick in those types of accounts makes this site start to feel like 2016 reddit 😂. Lemmy has become large enough to justify investment of bots to brigade and astroturf; we’ve made it!

        • @jaybone
          link
          42 months ago

          Someone should start a Lemmy.ru instance with communities like /c/kremlin or maybe /c/remlin

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        242 months ago

        I’ve seen iterations of “the Democrats stabbed Biden in the back!” too many times on here over the past 24 hours for it to be a coincidence

      • GeekFTW
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 months ago

        displays a total lack of knowledge

        Well we are talking about right wingers here, kinda par for the course. :P

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Get ready to repeat this: “The Biden of today is not the Biden who was voted for in the primaries.” Even Biden himself acknowledged that by stepping aside as candidate!

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      80
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You know what I’m not seeing?

      ANY of these accounts that were so relentless in their criticism of Biden and how he needed to step down because otherwise the Democrats would lose, being simply happy about this.

      ALL of the tentative happiness about Harris maybe being a stronger candidate than Biden was, is coming from people who were either neutral or defending Biden before. The people who were giving a firehose of criticism to Biden and demanding that it was MANDATORY for him to step down, for the good of the Democrats and the country, have for the most part fallen silent, and a whole new grouping has arisen to give criticism to Harris and say that as good progressives they could never vote for a cop.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿
        link
        fedilink
        572 months ago

        I was one of them and now am elated to vote for a non-geriatric piece of shit and a woman.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        222 months ago

        ANY of these accounts that were so relentless in their criticism of Biden and how he needed to step down because otherwise the Democrats would lose, being simply happy about this.

        Really? I’ve seen plenty of posts like that. Stuff like “Donated to the democratic party to show this was necessary”, “Finally, we can safely roast Trump for being old and senile”, “I don’t care who the replacement is, thank god he’s out”.

        There are some shit-stirrers, but they seem to be the minority.

        Disclaimer: I am not American, cannot vote or donate, am heavily invested in the election due to the ramifications on Ukraine.

        • mozz
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          Can you link me to them?

          You don’t, like, have to, but I am genuinely curious. I haven’t seen that and I am wondering if there is some segment of Lemmy that I am missing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Just look around this comment section, and other comment sections in [email protected] and [email protected]

            As I said, there’s the occasional commenter that is trying to throw shit at the democratic party generally, but by and large the majority of comments are in favour of this, and if you click through to individual users it’s not hard to find users that were hoping that Biden would drop out a week ago.

      • @Coach
        link
        English
        212 months ago

        I’m happy AF.

        Biden’s legacy is secure. He can rest easy as the man who beat back the right-wing fascist autocracy and led the country to elect the first female president. 🤞

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Even though I agree with you I would suggest not pushing the first woman president angle. There’s already plenty of dumbasses saying that she shouldn’t be elected because she’s a woman, including 2 of my women coworkers. One is a republican and the other a Democrat, both boomers too.

          Let’s just push the competent angle.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        142 months ago

        Yeah, they can’t take two seconds to enjoy the victory they wanted. They have to move on to the next thing to bitch and moan about.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            212 months ago

            Pretty much. That way when Trump won, they could say “see? We told you so!”

            Much more important than them or people they might care about getting marched into camps.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                152 months ago

                You already told me in another post that you’re not celebrating this and have moved on to Harris.

              • mozz
                link
                fedilink
                82 months ago

                bomb em Biden

                • Takes too long to even figure out
                • Not really all that punchy
                • “Genocide Joe” is already perfectly serviceable without these drawbacks
                • Dude… he’s out of the race now. Why you are even trying out new ways to dunk on Joe at this point is beyond me. Unless you were just excited that you thought of it and wanted to have a chance to apply it before the moment is past even though the moment is, at this point, past

                3/10. It’s not, like, a total failure, but there are multiple reasons just not even to use it. Can I recommend “cacklin’ Kamala” instead, as a replacement?

                • NoIWontPickAName
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -42 months ago

                  I really liked Genocidin Biden but he turned around and started dropping air packets and at least tried with the pier.

                  I think he should have driven aid trucks in with one us soldier per truck and said “Dare you.”, but I understand the high risk for loss of life.

                  He did a lot of good and even worked with the railroad union after he shut down their strike and earned my respect back from that one.

                  He is either in the shadow years of his life or he has just lost the ability to not seem that way in public.

                  The man has earned his retirement and now it is our job to try and get her elected.

                  That sending Israel everything and protecting their asses after what they have done.

                  A response was required, they unleashed hell on civilians and he continued to support them.

                  She probably will too, but maybe not.

                  While I would love someone way more on the “single provder” and new housing, those are long term changes

                  They listened and now it’s our turn to have their backs.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            52 months ago

            Exactly.

            It’s quite insidious.

            Today I’m suddenly seeing a lot of “vote blue no matter who”, which IMO is intended to stifle enthusiasm for Kamala.

            If the left could unite behind a candidate we’d destroy the GOP.

          • NoIWontPickAName
            link
            fedilink
            -142 months ago

            Nope, I just wanted his Israel supporting ass gone, she’ll probably do the same, but I KNOW he will

        • Aniki 🌱🌿
          link
          fedilink
          242 months ago

          That’s not true! I danced a jig when we found out. I was voting against Trump but now I am voting for Harris.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            172 months ago

            Several others are not. Including a person who has been posting anti-Biden articles in this community for months, who has now switched to anti-Harris articles.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          They never thought it would happen. They shot themselves in both feet with shotguns. Now they’re in panic mode because they’re realizing they’re really fucked now.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            92 months ago

            Then I guess you’re only happy if you’re miserable.

            • NoIWontPickAName
              link
              fedilink
              -12 months ago

              Actually I clicked the wrong reply button on this one.

              It would be nice to remember happy, but at least now I feel a little heard by my leaders

      • @NegativeInf
        link
        132 months ago

        Wasn’t rabid before, but I was one of those for Biden stepping down in favor of Kamala. I just wanted a strong voice that was capable of at least countering Trump’s endless spew of lies. But I have noticed those that are now bashing Kamala were also telling people not to vote for Biden.

      • @jumjummy
        link
        10
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They’re waiting on the next talking points from their Russian overlords. Give it a day or so and they’ll be back with some new, yet all the same, arguments.

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        Idk how this season is going to end but the writers have definitely been building toward something.

        • mozz
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Remember the end of season 1 of “Arcane”, where everything looks like maybe it’s gonna be okay, and then you get to see in slow motion how an unexpected spasm of violence undoes anything good that might have been building, and you know everything’s gonna be bad, bad bad, going forward?

          I hope I am wrong

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        62 months ago

        You know my history regarding Biden. Go on, check my history since Biden did the right thing and dropped out. I’m still posting and not so much as an unkind word about Harris. Biden did the right thing. The party did the right thing. I’m overjoyed that for the first fucking time in far too goddamned long, Democrats listened instead of digging in their heels and demanding votes, every pore reeking of entitled paternalist condescension.

        You were wrong. Your shitty candidate bowed out like you didn’t want him to, and just look. The party has very much gotten in line behind Kamala. The predicted chaos and infighting hasn’t happened. She’s had the best fundraising in US history simply by being the understudy who was present at the time and not being Biden.

        The people who were giving a firehose of criticism to Biden and demanding that it was MANDATORY for him to step down, for the good of the Democrats and the country, have for the most part fallen silent

        Have you considered that it’s because they’re finally satisfied? At least for now? Harris is a reasonable compromise candidate. Biden wasn’t, and he listened to reason and bowed out. We’re better for it.

        a whole new grouping has arisen to give criticism to Harris and say that as good progressives they could never vote for a cop.

        Democrats are a big tent. Some of us don’t like genocide. Some of us don’t like cops. Some of us don’t like either. Harris is in a better position to distance herself from past actions than Biden was about ongoing actions.

        She ran on full cannabis legalization in 2020 and was a sponsor of the Justice in Policing Act of 2020. It ain’t gonna stick.

        I’m glad Biden dropped out.

        Are you?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Have you considered that most if not all people were supporting Biden because they were doing what they could to save democracy? That maybe they weren’t voting for Biden, but against Trump?

          Of course you have. I’ve seen people actually tell you this first-hand- only for you to rewrite their shit and spit it back out as something entirely different. Because that’s what you do.

          You see, the rest of us are wiling to do whatever it takes to save those who WILL be hurt by Trump should he get elected. We’re not entitled and arrogant enough to think we have the luxury to not vote.

          But that’s because we’re mature adults that understand that merely asking for something isn’t all it takes to get it. We also understand that sometimes, the choices suck, and the lesser of two evils is all you have- and that not doing something isn’t an option when you’re wanting the opposite result of nothing to happen.

          Grow up.

          • @Ensign_Crab
            link
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Have you considered that most if not all people were supporting Biden because they were doing what they could to save democracy?

            Now that he’s dropped out and the party has enthusiastically lined up behind a better candidate, it’s clear that their insistence on an octogenarian genocide supporter ran contrary to that goal, and that everyone who called for Biden to step down was absolutely right.

            I’m glad Biden did the right thing. You wanted him to stay in and lose.

            You see, the rest of us are wiling to do whatever it takes to save those who WILL be hurt by Trump should he get elected.

            Except call for the guy who was losing to him to step the fuck aside. Now that he has, we’re more likely to beat Trump. You would have preferred to lose with Bidenyahu.

            But that’s because we’re mature adults that understand that merely asking for something isn’t all it takes to get it.

            We got what we wanted by asking. Your shit candidate stepped down and we now have a candidate who can beat Trump. Now get in line and vote blue no matter who.

            Oh yeah, and you’re doing a shit job of ignoring me.

      • @confusedbytheBasics
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        I am one of those accounts who wanted Biden to step aside. Not because I dislike him but because he was going to lose. Now I have hope. I’ve been smiling since Saturday afternoon.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        a whole new grouping has arisen to give criticism to Harris and say that as good progressives they could never vote for a cop.

        I mean, in both cases people are entitled to their honest opinions. I’m going to vote for her, but I’m not happy about it. Not being happy about her her career pre-whitehouse seems fairly reasonable to me.

        • @davidagain
          link
          42 months ago

          “People are entitled to their honest opinions” - but that wasn’t what was happening - a bunch of rightwingers posting as leftwingers were spending a lot of time trying to convince democrats not to vote. They had paragraphs to say about why Biden was terrible but could never find the same level of detail or ire about Trump, whereas someone who was genuinely leftwing would have a lot more to say about Trump than Biden by way of criticism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            Ah right OK, I’ve seen those folks. I think I was reading the tone of the discussion as general frustration with anyone who was dissenting.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -52 months ago

        lol that’s a really broad extrapolation of what, a few people you saw that happened to post something in the last day? Just boldly labeling anyone who had a criticism of Biden as a bitter troll or something?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -9
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Me, 22 days ago

        We’ve never had a pair of candidates this unpopular. (Maybe Trump vs Clinton)
        If the Dems had any kind of brains, they absolutely would pick someone else at the convention.
        Just not Harris; She might be the only one, less popular than Biden is.

        At this point, I guess she’s a better pick than Biden, just not by much.
        I still want an open convention, and someone else.

        • mozz
          link
          fedilink
          112 months ago

          I think the missing factor to consider is that Biden is unpopular mostly because of the media telling absolute dogshit lies about him like that he was bad for the economy.

          Sure, he’s old. But if “elderly” was a disqualifying factor, then “insurrectionist” would be, also. I think the issue is that the media is going in the tank against the progressive, as they tend to do, and that that has the potential to swing against any genuinely decent candidate that the Democrats want to put forward. I sorta hesitate to say that a good answer to that is “okay well let’s just put forward a more corporate friendly candidate who will be ‘popular’ with the people whose perception is shaped by the media.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -62 months ago

            But if “elderly” was a disqualifying factor, then “insurrectionist” would be, also.

            Those two things are unrelated.
            One is a crime, the other is inevitable.

            But my issue is that nearly all the Democratic elite, are more or less anti-progressive. The only real economic populist thing I know Biden did was appoint Lina Kahn as the FTC chair.

            I would love to see her as a candidate! But she chose to be born in England, taking herself out of the running.

            • mozz
              link
              fedilink
              15
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The only real economic populist thing I know Biden did was appoint Lina Kahn as the FTC chair.

              Half a trillion dollars spent addressing climate change, huge boosts to domestic manufacturing and unions, resulting in big wage gains for the working class outpacing even historic levels of inflation, income inequality actually going down which usually doesn’t happen in the US, big hike in corporate tax by two trillion dollars to pay for all of that

              The fact that Biden wasn’t seen as a victory for working people and progressive goals in the US is a sign of how INSANELY counterfactual our media created political reality is

              • TheHiddenCatboy
                link
                English
                32 months ago

                Don’t forget getting Student Loans to be somewhat affordable. 5% of not just your total income, but your disposable income, accounting for basic cost of living. That actually convinced me to step away from my ongoing education and enter loan repayment. A huge deal considering how much loan debt I have…

      • Flying Squid
        link
        322 months ago

        You’d think so, but they already have moved on to “don’t vote for Harris” posts.

        • mozz
          link
          fedilink
          23
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I actually was curious about it, so I looked over his posts, and it’s all over the place. Pro-Marianne Williamson, anti-Nancy Pelosi, pro-open convention and by implication anti-“coronation”, criticizing Harris for not being LBGTQ friendly enough…

          Actually. You know what, it’s not really all that all over the place. 🙂 It’s just a little bit subtle with the consistent anti-Harris / anti-Democrat message, from different angles, enough so that I didn’t really pick up on it until I started typing them out.

          Also I notice Marianne Williamson is starting to edge out Cornel West as the nonsensical candidate to support instead of the candidate that might be able to win the election

    • @TexasDrunk
      link
      192 months ago

      Already happening. They’re testing the waters to see what’s going to stick.

        • toomanypancakes
          link
          English
          232 months ago

          I just ran into them trying to promote Jill stein in another thread lol

        • @TexasDrunk
          link
          192 months ago

          And her past as a prosecutor, and the fact that she lost the primary 4 years ago, and her laugh. In addition to yours, that’s all I’ve seen so far. They ran “Heels up Harris” into the ground several years ago, but I do think it will make a return at some point. It was a shit insult but so are the others they’re trying to use.

          Really all they have is a terrible legal gambit to try to keep her off ballots. That one is laughably bad. No deadlines have passed. The idiot at the front of the House said something stupid. I would hammer that until election day. “The Republicans did their best to keep us off the ballot because they hate freedom and democracy. They don’t want you to have a choice. And Trump endorsed Harris. Here’s the check.”

          • Flying Squid
            link
            102 months ago

            She also said something hard to understand about coconuts. Don’t forget that one. That means something or other.

            • @TexasDrunk
              link
              82 months ago

              Now they’re panicking and can’t decide if she’s unlikable or if she’s the “whacky aunt” entertaining everyone at the barbecue.

              I went to the other place to check TFGs meltdown tweets or truths or turds or whatever they call them and I was not disappointed. He is asking for his money back because the attack ads they’ve purchased were against Joe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      Oh yeah I’ve been called a fascist already because I said I’d vote for Harris and that while she isn’t the best candidate she will be leagues better than Biden imo.

    • @Guy_Fieris_Hair
      link
      5
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      While I never told anyone not to vote for Biden, I definitely openly bitched about him not being capable of speaking and the absolute joke it is. I’m not a fan of Harris, but my God, a sentient adult is amazing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        Sorta the same here. I didn’t openly say anything and I’m voting blue but when he called Zelensky putin and Kamala trump I internally slumped my shoulders.

    • @jaybone
      link
      42 months ago

      Everything they already pinned on Joe (like mainly Israel) they can pin on her because she was part of the same administration. Plus they will now also point at things from her past, like history as a criminal prosecutor, and blame her for that as well. Since that won’t align with progressive criminal reform agenda. And they might call her a race traitor as well, just for good measure. Should be interesting to see what the tankies and communists come up with.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Your argument is bizarre. Please explain why someone wouldn’t use “things from her past” to inform their vote. You use the word “blame” as though she is a victim of her own decisions.

        I don’t know a single communist who would call someone a race traitor. That’s nuts and your anger is very misdirected.

        • @confusedbytheBasics
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          Things from the past are worth knowing for sure but what’s important are her goals now, her administration, and her platform overall.

        • @jaybone
          link
          12 months ago

          I’m not angry about anything. And I’m not sure where you see anger in my post (and therefore how it could be directed at anyone.) I’m making an observation based on what I see here on Lemmy. I even state it will be interesting to see what some lemmies will come up with. No anger here pal. Just observations.

    • @MarciaLynnDorsett
      link
      12 months ago

      there’s a bunch of people on Lemmy really mad that they can’t tell everyone not to vote for Biden anymore.

      is there any evidence for this claim at all?

      • Flying Squid
        link
        92 months ago

        I guess I wasn’t talking about you then, was I?

        But do please explain why I shouldn’t have ignored the people I wasn’t criticizing when I was criticizing another group. Is this some weird ‘both sides’ thing?

        • NoIWontPickAName
          link
          fedilink
          -22 months ago

          It’s an easy way to group all of someone together and pretend that everyone was the same, when we aren’t.

          You pretend like there are only a few people who are like me and that the vast aren’t.

  • @ceenote
    link
    239
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    GOP: “Your candidate is unfit for office.”

    Dems: “Okay, we got a new candidate.”

    GOP: shocked pikachu

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        392 months ago

        They’re going to, probably in every single red state.

        They’re going to throw so much shit at the wall due to election ballot timing that unfortunately I think something will stick… it more than likely wont be legitimate, but we have way too many corrupt judges out there :(

        • @ChonkyOwlbear
          link
          272 months ago

          If there is any way Mississippi and Arkansas can keep a black woman Democrat off the ballot, they will find it.

          • Cadeillac
            link
            English
            82 months ago

            Please get me out of this state

          • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
            link
            82 months ago

            You mean Mississippi and Arkansas might go red? I guess our entire electoral strategy’s doomed, then!

            • @Mirshe
              link
              42 months ago

              Except other states could use that as a case to federally disqualify a candidate. “Well they weren’t on the ballot in all the states, can this be said to be a representative vote?”

              • @dhork
                link
                English
                52 months ago

                Ironically, this is where the SC’s ruling to keep Trump on the ballot can be helpful. Because as long as the proper paperwork is filed in time, the committee can nominate whoever it wants, and the state doesn’t have the power to disqualify someone.

          • Coffee Addict
            link
            English
            31 month ago

            It’s a good thing we had no chance of winning those states then lol.

            If they did, it might actually drive up voter enthusiasm around the country. So I could see it backfiring spectacularly.

          • @Gigasser
            link
            02 months ago

            Ehh not like deep red states would ever swing towards the Dems anyways. So fuck em

        • @ceenote
          link
          272 months ago

          I don’t think it’s a given that something will stick in a way that actually throws a wrench in the election. It would have to be in a swing state, the judge would have to be willing to become infamous around the world, and willing to ignore the precedent that generally political parties can choose candidates how they want and of course a nominee can decline the nomination.

          Oh fuck, Aileen Cannon exists…

      • @andros_rex
        link
        302 months ago

        They aren’t going to sue. They are going to start shooting. They’ve outright stated that. It’s crystal clear: they’ve said that the revolution would be “bloodless” only if the left “allowed” it to be. I really wanted to live long enough to build a family,.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You missed what Johnson said this morning. He says it’s “unlawful” in some states. (Which is not true in the slightest and they know it)

          How much you want to bet that this only will be “unlawful” in red governmental shithole states

          He’s basically giving a dog whistle to maggot judges to hold the line for the fascist party’s interest if these “challenges” come to them.

          Edit: fixed for feels being hurt / jimmies rustled

            • @AngryCommieKender
              link
              11
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The only nice thing about those red shitholes is that it’s stupidly easy to get a gun. Get one. Join your local chapter of the SRA. Train at the local range at least twice a month so that you are proficient with it. Learn all the local stand your ground laws. Memorize them. When they start shooting, aim center mass.

              While a pistol is far more portable, it requires far more training, as the lower mass of the firearm results in a larger than expected kick. Shotguns are really the weapon of choice for urban defense.

              I personally have a couple of extremely nice sniper crossbows, that are basically silent. Seriously, the bolt impacting my target makes more noise than the bow. A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06. Lots of ammo too.

              Learning how to reload your ammo is also invaluable, should they start shooting. Have a “riot shield,” basically the largest piece of steel you can easily carry that is more than 2" thick. Body armor is also a useful investment.

              • @ulkesh
                link
                82 months ago

                I find it turns my stomach at the thought of training at a gun range with people who would rather shoot me in the head than tell me the time of day. That’s the kind of gun fetishists who live in the area I’m at.

                • @buddascrayon
                  link
                  92 months ago

                  Not that I’m advocating for training with intent cause there’s far too much gun violence as it is, but if you are in a gun range and training to use a gun, the wack jobs are all going to assume you are one of them. They really believe that liberals are scared of guns and wouldn’t dare to own one. Much less train to use one.

              • @Olhonestjim
                link
                72 months ago

                I’m all about most of what you said, but nobody anywhere is carrying a steel shield 2" thick.

                • @AngryCommieKender
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Carry isn’t the right word here. I have a 6’ x 2’ x 2" piece of steel that I mounted on a stand and wheels. It’s technically mobile in that I can move the thing with effort. It is bulletproof though. I have tested it against AP rounds.

                  I don’t take it with me on protests, it sits in my house in one of the most defensable positions in the house.

                  Yeah the thing weighs about half a ton.

              • @frog_brawler
                link
                32 months ago

                Speaking from experience, SRA in central FL/ Orlando is useless. Paid $35 to be put into the Jacksonville SRA and got a link to an inactive discord channel.

                I’m all ears for a viable alternative until I get out to Colorado.

              • Tiefling IRL
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                A couple of T-33s, an AA-12, and a 30-06

                The uhh, automatic shotgun???

                • @AngryCommieKender
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Yep. I got that while I was in the service. I like that bad boy. It has a selector switch for single fire. I don’t buy weapons for daily use, or for hunting animals.

              • @TehWorld
                link
                English
                12 months ago

                A 1 square foot, 2 inch steel plate is 81lbs. Ain’t nobody carrying armor like that.

                • @AngryCommieKender
                  link
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Carry isn’t the right word here. I have one that is 12 sq feet, it is “mobile” in that it has wheels and a stand. I can barely move the thing around, but it is certainly bulletproof. I e tested it against AP rounds. Yes the thing weighs about half a ton.

          • Pennomi
            link
            English
            112 months ago

            How is it unlawful? The candidate hasn’t even been formally selected yet.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              162 months ago

              Exactly. It’s not. And they know it. The fact they’re trying to run to their judges means they are scared.

            • @frog_brawler
              link
              42 months ago

              It’s not. They’re consistently full of shit.

          • @BetaBlake
            link
            -12 months ago

            Can we try not to talk like Trump? No state as a whole is a shit hole full of shit hole people, those kinds of statements reek of elitism and it’s not a good look.

            • @frostysauce
              link
              52 months ago

              I live in Oklahoma. It is a shithole. I live in a shithole state.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 months ago

        They’re just trying to rile up their base that this is “cheating” so that they come out to vote in outrage

        • edgarde
          link
          English
          11
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They’re ginning up arguments about “cheating” in case they lose. Trump has never admitted to losing an election, always claiming the winner cheated. And as we saw on Jan 6, it really riles up the dirtbags that form Trump’s unique voter constituency.

  • @raef
    link
    2192 months ago

    Maybe they should have spent time and money promoting their candidate instead of attacking the other

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1402 months ago

      This is really what it boils down to. But with Trump there is nothing to promote. The only way they can win is by ruining the reputation of their opponent to try to make them look worse.

      • @SuckMyWang
        link
        762 months ago

        What about hunters laptop? That’s still going to be a huge deal right? Right??

        • @rustyfish
          link
          702 months ago

          Didn’t you know Kamala let her tamagotchi die 30 years ago? Do you know where that tamagotchi has been buried? You might not know about this, but everyone is talking about this. But they don’t because they are too scared to talk about it. A lot of good people. They talk about it. And the world is laughing at us. The good people talking about this are too scared to talk because the world is laughing.

              • I Cast Fist
                link
                fedilink
                42 months ago

                Have they looked for it on that underground pizza place? All them libruls have secret meetings in there, for realsies!

      • @BrokenGlepnir
        link
        22 months ago

        But it doesn’t matter if he had nothing to promote. He’s not above lying. This was just a bad decision on their part. Even if biden hadn’t dropped out, there’s no guarantee that a man that age will be here in four months.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          He’s not above lying.

          Lying is one of the things he has a lot of practice doing.

          He’s not very good at it, though, he contradicts his lies with other lies on a regular basis.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        132 months ago

        Project 2025 tends to disagree

        • @ccunning
          link
          222 months ago

          True. Their policies are so bad they have to disavow them…

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            52 months ago

            Except to the right audience they are extremely proud of them. Yes overall their policies are unpopular but they aren’t without support

            • @ccunning
              link
              02 months ago

              Sure - but they don’t need to win those folks votes

              • @TrickDacy
                link
                02 months ago

                What’s the point here? I’m trying to point out the very real danger they represent. Are you really going to downplay that danger? This is how we lost roe v wade

                • @ccunning
                  link
                  22 months ago

                  Whoa…I agree with you. And I’m not sure why what I said upset you. I am just speaking in the context of the discussion of the post which is campaign strategy.

                  We need to shout about Project 2025 from the rooftops because it’s so toxic the Trump campaign wants it to stay hidden.

                • @raef
                  link
                  12 months ago

                  It’s that they don’t need to be won over. They are going to vote for Trump regardless.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            92 months ago

            Call it what you want. The document is very clearly full of harmful policy goals.

      • @raef
        link
        22 months ago

        Yeah, it’s not a difficult concept

    • @Guy_Fieris_Hair
      link
      102 months ago

      I was thinking this when everyone was saying it’s too late to change candidates. While that might have been true if a campaign consisted of promoting people’s positives, that’s not what it is. It’s all about finding the dirt on the other and switching candidates late just means there has been less shit talked.

    • magic_lobster_party
      link
      fedilink
      -42 months ago

      Policies don’t sell in the current political climate. It has been all about Trump vs not Trump since 2016.

      • @raef
        link
        22 months ago

        Oh, I understand, but if was still their strategy choice.

  • FuzzyRedPanda
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1992 months ago

    Trump added that he thought the GOP should be “reimbursed for fraud.”

    Trump raises an excellent point: his campaign was forced to waste money against Biden for as long as it did only for the Democrats to pull the rug out from under him by pulling Joe out of the race. This, if anything, is a form of cheating.

    AH HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      872 months ago

      GOP: Fuck your feelings might makes right REAL MEN ARE BACK don’t tread on me THESE COLORS DON’T RUN SON

      Also: Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    • @ceenote
      link
      842 months ago

      Unironically “I object on the grounds that it’s devastating to my case”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      482 months ago

      Ahh, the famous cheat of checks notes changing your mind weeks before announcing a decision.

      Biden was never running against Trump in the 2024 election. The Democrats still have not announced a candidate. If the Republicans wanted to campaign against the presumptive nominee before an official decision was made, that’s on them.

  • @frunch
    link
    143
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I can’t believe all those stupid anti-biden truck decals etc will be rendered pointless in a matter of months. I better start making anti-Kamala decals if i want to properly capitalize on these next 4 years 🤑

    Edit: cry into your fuckin ear-squares ya bunch of sad sacks

    • @apocalypticat
      link
      552 months ago

      Their favorite cheap Chinese manufacturers are already on it, ready to take more of their money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        142 months ago

        You can still cash in. There always needs to be the middle man in that scenario, buy em for $3 each. Sell em for $20 at flea markets and fairs.

        • @apocalypticat
          link
          112 months ago

          I’m not interested in generating fascist, environment-polluting junk though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      172 months ago

      Those people aren’t going to let go of their anti-Biden identity that easily, we will probably still see those decals for years.

    • @ImpressiveEssay
      link
      -32 months ago

      In fairness… a lefty could make bank on anti Kamala stickers (that secretly hide they are too her but only people who finished school would notice)

  • @RattlerSix
    link
    1262 months ago

    Biden is now a man with nothing to lose and a supreme court that said presidents can do any damn thing they please

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1242 months ago

    Now their candidate is the old fuck and is a felon who’s fighting against a black woman (!) that used to send felons to jail.

    Of course they are pissed! As they should be!

    • ShadowRam
      link
      fedilink
      372 months ago

      I absolutely can’t WAIT for the next debate.

      and Trump can’t chicken out without looking like a Chump…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        232 months ago

        He will chicken out. He’ll pull some excuse about unfair rules or a biased moderator that will be completely and utterly transparent to everyone except his base.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          62 months ago

          It’s transparent to his base too. It’s not that they don’t see the lies, it’s that they don’t care.

          To Republicans, winning matters more than playing by the rules. This isn’t some gentlemanly game of chess. It’s a knife fight. The future of their country hangs in the balance, and the only thing that matters is being the people who steer the ship. If you have to lie cheat and steal to get there, so be it.

          The Dems need to wake the fuck up and start doing the same.

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      92 months ago

      Nice, I didn’t pay attention this weekend and this is the first I’m hearing Biden stepped down.

      Great way to start a Monday at least

      • @ABCDE
        link
        192 months ago

        Harris is not confirmed, by the way, just a presumptive nominee. The Democratic Party is gathering behind her as it stands.

        • @Plopp
          link
          162 months ago

          In other words: it’s Kamala Harris.

          • @ABCDE
            link
            12 months ago

            The Democratic National Convention’s rules committee are also set to meet on Wednesday to discuss the process for picking a new candidate.

            I imagine they won’t just push her forward, but who knows.

  • @Furbag
    link
    1052 months ago

    Of course they are mad. The Republican strategy up until this point has been to attack the incumbent, but now the incumbent is no longer running for re-election. Trump literally doesn’t know how to deal with this situation. His whole shtick is to attack the person currently in charge, but that doesn’t do shit for him now.

    A big part of why he lost in 2020, imo, is that he didn’t have anybody to blame for all the bad shit happening in the country at the time. He himself was in charge and could only say “things will get worse under Biden”, but people were sick of Covid fucking up our lives and the endless scandals that hit the news daily.

    • @SkyezOpen
      link
      582 months ago

      He’s gonna tie every biden policy to Hillary Clinton and attack her based on that.

      Then hopefully someone will remind him that he’s running against Kamala Harris and not Clinton.

      • @HessiaNerd
        link
        222 months ago

        More likely they will just make up a connection with Hillary and Kamala. Like they are in the same coven and drink adrenochrome together.

        Why did my keyboard know autocorrect the spelling of that word?

        • @mossy_
          link
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          what the hell… I’ve never heard of this before

          • @Machinist
            link
            English
            52 months ago

            Wild huh? Hunter Thompson wrote about it once, and then it was in the movie version of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. Got warped around to what it is now.

            There is a large chunk of the US population that believes this shit or things adjacent to it. 30% or so, I think. I’ve lost many people to it.

            Check out Qanon Qausilties on Reddit. It’s a cult, that’s a mental illness, that’s a political movement. Useful for the fascists. Very dangerous. Very sad.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            It’s a real substance the body makes, but it can also be synthesized. As such, people have taken it to try it out. Iirc it isn’t even a fun high, so they started making up that children make “better” versions or something.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              It’s just blood libel with the label scrapped off. Until you dig deeper into right wing conspiracies, then it’s just regular blood libel.

      • @QuarterSwede
        link
        12 months ago

        This mad me laugh out loud uncontrollably. Well done!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      162 months ago

      the Republican Party had "spent tens of millions of dollars running against Joe Biden

      Damn, if only they had spent that tens of millions of dollars campaigning for somebody, then this wouldn’t have even mattered.

      • @TehWorld
        link
        English
        22 months ago

        Or even attack the policies. The problem for the Trump Party is that they are a cult of personality and don’t understand what policy really means.

    • @pyre
      link
      102 months ago

      they’re gonna have to re-edit some of their attack ads ready to go and just add “and SHE was there, vice presidenting all of it” at the end.

  • @brandon
    link
    English
    1032 months ago

    Maybe they will start to realize the persistent election cycle is not a good thing. I would love to see a ban on all election campaigning until 90 days before said election but that wouldn’t get past a 1st amendment challenge.

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      55
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Just do publicly funded elections, including things like publicly funded frequent small debates where the candidates had to appear as reasonably competent adults who could defend their ideas, and resurrect some of the regulations like the fairness doctrine and caps on media consolidation

      The dogshit quality of the current election coverage is mostly a problem because it is the only type of coverage that is available. I think if there was a widely available and well funded type of election coverage that wasn’t this cash grab horse race ad supported bullshit, the bullshit would have to compete against it and would lose and improve as a result.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
        link
        English
        32 months ago

        How about publicly funded elections and limits on campaigning more than 90 days before an election?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          If you limit when the public funds are dispersed, then there won’t be much campaigning outside that time frame.

    • @iAvicenna
      link
      432 months ago

      Lets start by putting a cap on how much money can be spent on campaigns and keep it at a very minimal level.

      • @barsquid
        link
        202 months ago

        Sounds good. We’ll just need to re-do Citizens United with fewer than 5 fully regressive appointees purchased by billionaires.

      • @crank0271
        link
        32 months ago

        Cap it at like $30. You can run an ad in the student newspaper of your choice.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        If it’s robust enough that it actually limits campaign spending without loopholes, then that alone might do it. Campaigns would have to use their funds more strategically, and the best time to spend is in the weeks before an election, not a year out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        That’ll never work, big donors will just hide it or do the advertising themselves unrelated of course

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    902 months ago

    This is starting to look like an effective strategy for the Democrats to drain Republican funds: don’t announce your actual candidate until August.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    892 months ago

    The problem with a 2 party system is that it is a lot easier to make the opposition look bad rather than make your candidate look good.

    So all these MAGAs lost a lot of money since their smear campaign of Biden is now worth nothing and they will have to start over.

    • @douglasg14b
      link
      3
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The smear campaign for Harris is already ramping up into full fashion.

      Anything and everything is being thrown at the wall to see if it sticks. It’s absolutely disgusting behavior.

      • @SLVRDRGN
        link
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Goes to show - is that what they really wanted? I think this highlights that they really just enjoyed all the mudslinging more than anything.

  • @athairmor
    link
    872 months ago

    Oh no, all of their bots will have to be reprogrammed.

  • @SpikedPunchVictim
    link
    76
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You guys realize that Biden waited until after the RNC to announce this right? He’s making this as hard as possible for them to pivot. You had hundreds of people in the same city, building strategies for their campaign. He had made sure that Kamala would have the delegates secured to ensure there would be no in-fighting for the next candidate. They did little to stop the media in going down the rabbit hole of the all-consuming news that he should drop out. They used it for their advantage to create a positive whirl wind around Kamala. Truly brilliant.

  • @iAvicenna
    link
    732 months ago

    So they are basically admitting that their whole campaign argument was “Biden is bad Trump is not Biden” and now that he is gone, the argument is invalid. After all if it was a campaign mostly about Trump’s positive qualities (in their perspective) then it should not have really mattered who the opposition is.

  • @apocalypticat
    link
    682 months ago

    In the blink of an eye, their surplus of hateful anti-Biden merchandise becomes even more useless. This will surely make them realize how idiotic their cult is /s.