• @Lost_My_Mind
    link
    1552 months ago

    …yeah, ok. Sounds good.

    moves to California

    • Em Adespoton
      link
      fedilink
      272 months ago

      I’ve got “Hotel California” and “San Francisco” battling it out in my head now.

    • @Alteon
      link
      232 months ago

      It’ll never happen. US Military would never willingly split itself apart, let itself get split apart, or let another nation that it’s not allied with have any sort of Army on its equivalent. The 50 states are here to stay.

      • @CharlesDarwinOP
        link
        English
        472 months ago

        Never say never. The domestic terrorists/agents of Putin are aching for an actual shooting civil war.

        • @WoodScientist
          link
          182 months ago

          Even a peaceful division of the US would be something they would seriously benefit from. The US permanently divided against itself, each side easy to manipulate into a military conflict against the other. We would have nukes pointed at each other within a decade. It would be like the splitting of India and Pakistan, along with all the accompanying human rights atrocities.

          • @captainlezbian
            link
            42 months ago

            Also how long before an invasion? They’re fascists, fascists don’t sit still while experiencing consequences, they invade

      • @mkwt
        link
        152 months ago

        <General Sherman claws his way out of the grave.>

          • @cmbabul
            link
            6
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Dude should have gone west after Savannah, Atlanta has its shit mostly together now

              • @cmbabul
                link
                22 months ago

                Agreed, but that seems more a reaction to the progress than a symptom of it not happening.

      • Cruxifux
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        The US military is going to be replaced by Trump loyalists. Whatever he wants to happen is what’s gonna happen.

        • @AngryCommieKender
          link
          12 months ago

          I doubt it. He can barely run his shit past the civilian government. I’d be surprised if he knows that the UCMJ exists. The brass aren’t going to just fall in line, they know what an illegal order is, and what to do when they are given one.

          He may manage to be the first POTUS that is ever told by the military that they have no confidence in him, and will refuse to take orders from him.

          • Cruxifux
            link
            fedilink
            42 months ago

            Maybe. But I also see a lot of trump support within the military. I really don’t think it will be as cut and dry as you say. Especially if he goes through with his prosecuting and removal of every military officer involved in the Afghanistan exit, which to me just seems like a way to pick and choose loyalists in his military.

            • @AngryCommieKender
              link
              22 months ago

              That’s the thing he is going to find out. There are procedures for these things, and I seriously doubt that he can luck into getting consistent panels of 5 JAG that will throw the book at people over fabricated evidence. Also what he isn’t taking into account is that all of them have the defence that he ordered them to do it, so the buck stops with him. Having the military put the POTUS under military tribunal because he forced them to would be pretty funny though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      It’s expansive here in the places you may want to live, but seriously… It’s worth it. There’s also a lot of cheap places that aren’t as ideal.

  • The Quuuuuill
    link
    fedilink
    English
    702 months ago

    that’s not… usually what you do win you win. so like… honestly… okay, kick me out, let me be governed by a saner government. also DC is between two blue state so good luck evacuating back to your conservative safe space, dumbass

  • @CharlesDarwinOP
    link
    English
    702 months ago

    Predictable. The donvict-humpers supposedly “win”, and then get even MORE angry. Why so angry?

    I suspect it’s because for this brief period of time, anyway, it’s hard for them to avoid just how HATED they and their precious golden donvict truly are. They thought they’d “win” and all the normal Americans around them would just disappear. And yet, Karens like Green continue to get confronted by normal people.

    • @Sludgehammer
      link
      English
      512 months ago

      The donvict-humpers supposedly “win”, and then get even MORE angry. Why so angry?

      Because we’ve stolen their martyrdom from them by losing.

      • @cmbabul
        link
        262 months ago

        This is outrageously anecdotal but the trumpers I know were all grins on the day after until they realized we weren’t gonna just get over this and they just labeled themselves. They seem pissy now, and one in my office in particular that used to chat with me about sports is really broken up I don’t want to anymore

        • @CharlesDarwinOP
          link
          English
          242 months ago

          They seem pissy now, and one in my office in particular that used to chat with me about sports is really broken up I don’t want to anymore

          Yeah, the Professional Left did an entire section about this and they mentioned the case where some husband is completely gobsmacked that his wife filed for divorce.

          But yeah, I’ve seen the same thing and heard about it from others. Lots of quiet interactions about how so and so is a big proponent of donvict; don’t invite him/her to {whatever social function}.

          The refrain of “yeah, but let’s just agree to disagree” - I can see why many people, especially those most at risk thanks to what they wan, are thinking: “YEAH, FUCK THAT. You just voted to harm me, and you want to act like it’s just a disagreement?”

          • JaggedRobotPubes
            link
            English
            22 months ago

            Donvict is the only good name for him anybody has come up with. Good job.

    • Meeech
      link
      222 months ago

      Why so angry? It’s all they know…

      • @NocturnalMorning
        link
        62 months ago

        I wouldnt say that. Left and right leaning people are mixed all over the country. It’s not like the civil war when people were geographically located where the states wanted to cecede.

        Point is, my comment was a joke. If the U.S. fractures into a bunch of smaller countries, its not going to be a good time for anybody.

          • @NocturnalMorning
            link
            12 months ago

            Who knows, maybe we’ll get lucky and Trump will choke on a McDonald’s big mac and die.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          The right in a deep blue state tend to have more in common with the Democrats then they do with Conservatives in a deep red state.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    472 months ago

    I mean… as long as California takes Colorado and New Mexico with it, I see no real issues with that. We get the economy, the nature, and the nukes.

      • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
        link
        English
        182 months ago

        We’ll bring along Oregon and Washington, at least the west halves, and call the country the Collective of American States.

        • @AngryCommieKender
          link
          42 months ago

          I have never seen this version before. This flag makes even less sense than the standard NCR flag.

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        42 months ago

        Something that I learned recently makes this flag make absolutely no sense.

        The bear on the flag of The Republic of California, is extinct, and has been since the 1920s. Therefore in the Fallout universe, that bear is also extinct. None of them could have mutated into the two headed version. Where the heck did this flag come from?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They still would have had the original California flag; the NCR flag would have been based on it, probably to deliberately harken back to the time before the restructuring of the country into the 13 Commonwealths divided the state in two

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      22 months ago

      Aren’t the nukes in Montana and the dakotas? Though I’m under the impression we also keep some silos in the rural northeast.

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          42 months ago

          Did not expect the distribution to be like that, especially with blue states having nearly as many as red and swing states combined. For anyone curious: Blue state nukes-4324 Red state nukes-2266 Swing state nukes-2454

          Washington really surprised me but it makes a lot of sense actually. I knew there were none at Wright patt because you learn that growing up in Dayton, they can’t risk the aliens.

          And yeah I knew albequerque is one of the most critical cities for our ability to project nuclear force and that we make and test them in New Mexico and that Colorado is home to norad command. I just had also thought there were some hidden in Appalachia in upstate New York or something or one of the other eastern mountain ranges

          • @Goodmorningsunshine
            link
            12 months ago

            Swing states might have voted Trump, but those coward tards would follow the money in a secession situation, so I think the majority and their nukes would be on the sane blue side

  • @Furbag
    link
    432 months ago

    About the only thing that would make me happier than to have the entire pacific west coast secede and create a sovereign nation would be for Trump to do it for us so we don’t have to fight a war over it. You want us gone? Please, show us the exit, we’ll be on our way. No takebacksies.

      • @SwordInStone
        link
        5
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Iirc one of MA ME electoral votes will go to Trump, ao nlt really no-one

        Edit: I’m stupid. MA is Massachusetts which is blue af (every county iirc). Maine is ME

          • @SwordInStone
            link
            62 months ago

            I am too confidently incorrect sometimes. I’m not from the US, I thought you meant Maine.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 months ago

              Maine is, sadly, ME. It’s very weird. I think MN is Minnesota even tho MI feels more sensible but it’s Michigan. I think they did their best given what they had to work with :(

    • JaggedRobotPubes
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      This made me feel good to think about. And the downsides about why we could never do it are now equally matched and going to happen anyway.

      Only issue would be public health stuff, but that requires cooperation across the board.

  • @M600
    link
    422 months ago

    How is it not illegal for her to say these things? Like is that a threat against the United States?

    • @Goodmorningsunshine
      link
      302 months ago

      A known traitor threat against the United States was allowed to run for and be elected president. This country doesn’t have laws except for the poor and it certainly doesn’t have a functioning system of justice or even government at this point.

    • NeilBrü
      link
      23
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Depends.

      Protected by the first amendment, one can legally advocate for the dissolution of the Union through bicameral ratification outlined constitutionally by constitutional amendment. To advocate for armed insurrection or violent overthrow of the federal government is sedition and considered quite illegal.

      • @MrPoopbutt
        link
        142 months ago

        Is it really illegal if the law isn’t enforced? Is anything a Republican does illegal anymore?

        • NeilBrü
          link
          15
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’ve always loved this quote about conservatism:

          Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition: there must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

          • Francis Wilhoit
      • @eran_morad
        link
        52 months ago

        “illegal” is rather a quaint notion.

        • @Freefall
          link
          32 months ago

          These people are very much against a lot of things on the constitution…and the bible…and fake-champion both…ugh

        • NeilBrü
          link
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You’re correct. I was wrong. The Constitution would have to be amended to allow for it first.

          The United States Constitution does not explicitly provide a method for the dissolution of the union. In fact, the Constitution is quite silent on the topic of secession or dissolution.

          However, there are a few relevant provisions and historical precedents that are often cited in discussions about the possibility of dissolution:

          Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1: This clause, also known as the “Guarantee Clause,” states that the United States shall guarantee to every state a republican form of government. Some argue that this clause implies a constitutional obligation for the federal government to maintain the union and prevent secession.

          The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2): This clause establishes the Constitution and federal laws as the supreme law of the land, which some interpret as precluding the possibility of secession.

          The Civil War and the 14th Amendment: The American Civil War (1861-1865) was fought, in part, over the issue of secession. The 14th Amendment (1868) was ratified in the aftermath of the war and includes language that could be seen as prohibiting secession. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment states that no person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States shall be eligible to hold federal or state office.

          Texas v. White (1869): In this landmark Supreme Court case, the Court ruled that secession is not permissible under the Constitution. The decision stated that the Constitution looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible states.

          While these provisions and precedents suggest that the Constitution does not provide a clear method for dissolution, they do not necessarily rule out the possibility of secession or dissolution entirely. Some argue that secession could be achieved through a constitutional amendment or a negotiated agreement between the federal government and a state or group of states.

          It’s worth noting that, in practice, the possibility of dissolution is often seen as a highly unlikely and potentially destabilizing event. The United States has a long history of federalism and a strong tradition of national unity, which has generally been maintained through a system of shared power and compromise between the federal government and the states.

    • @satanmat
      link
      102 months ago

      Don’t threaten me with a good time…

      • GladiusB
        link
        222 months ago

        Russia has a smaller economy. Go ahead. Make it without us. Dumb fucks.

        • @cmbabul
          link
          142 months ago

          Can… can Washington come? The western half at least?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            52 months ago

            Most of the Western states would probably end up joining overall. I dont see Idaho lasting too long being one of the few remaining states that far west for example.

            • ivanafterall ☑️
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Utah and Idaho definitely wouldn’t join California. Both are heavily Mormon/religious, conservative, and backward. Colorado, New Mexico, and Nevada probably would.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                Artillery and attacks on infrastructure can be very persuasive. We dont need the people just the raw resources.

          • @samus12345
            link
            English
            42 months ago

            Washington and Oregon are basically Very Northern California.

    • themadcodger
      link
      fedilink
      412 months ago

      Blue states pay more in taxes than they receive, and vice versa with red states. We are literally funding them dragging us all backwards.

  • @Snowclone
    link
    382 months ago

    So they know that Texas doesn’t have a GDP high enough to even run all their red catastrophies, right? I’m kidding, I know they don’t know. They probably also don’t know that CA would be the third largest super power if they ever let us go. Which they won’t. At all.

    • @Draces
      link
      412 months ago

      Californians are in an abusive relationship. Blamed for everything and not allowed to leave

    • @Restaldt
      link
      122 months ago

      California should secede and kick off the great (terrible) balkanization of the formerly united states

      NCR & The North East republic

      Vs

      Yeehawistan

      • @captainlezbian
        link
        42 months ago

        Unfortunately that would cause a Pakistan-Bangladesh situation with a country connected by airlines. Except worse because Illinois, Minnesota, Colorado, and New Mexico would be enclaves in trumpistan

    • @_chris
      link
      English
      72 months ago

      I don’t know, they are certainly close to dumb enough to sign off on it. Or, you know, we can just do it and ignore the rules since they are all so fond of that now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    342 months ago

    Marjorie Taylor Dumbfuck here doesn’t realize that her state, and in fact all Republican-led states, are solely dependent on blue state generosity in order to continue to exist. I’m sure the blue states would absolutely love for these freeloading welfare states to leave the union, because it would offer an immediate federal surplus that could be better allocated on themselves. It will never happen, because the smart conservatives love having a never-ending money faucet they can gargle when their economic plans fail due to their own ineptitude.

    • @Bosht
      link
      English
      42 months ago

      Poetic, and agreed on all points. I stress because if these fucking morons are dumb enough to try, I have to predict it so I can get the fuck out before everything collapses.

  • @friend_of_satan
    link
    English
    342 months ago

    A republican flip flopping on states rights again? I’m shocked.

  • @samus12345
    link
    English
    342 months ago

    If it weren’t mainly a rural vs. urban split, I’d be all for the fascists getting their own country to ruin. But we’re too spread out to make it feasible.

    • @Goodmorningsunshine
      link
      112 months ago

      Yeah, we’d essentially become three countries - the West, the East, and the No-Go Zone in the middle. Just get us New Mexicans to somewhere decent before all borders close.

      • @SkyezOpen
        link
        142 months ago

        Brother we don’t even like the old Mexicans. You’ll probably be in cuffs before someone can find the crayons to explain to trump the difference between Mexico and New Mexico.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      If it weren’t mainly a rural vs. urban split, I

      Yeah, we’d have to move them somewhere, perhaps down South… Make the link around say Virginia… Sounds familiar, but I can’t lay my finger on it…