F you, Taylor Swift!” shouted Megyn Kelly, “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

For those not fluent in Republican crazy-speak, Kelly’s meltdown was triggered by Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris the night before, barely one hour after Trump all but face-planted on the debate stage. Kelly was especially triggered by Swift highlighting her appreciation for vice presidential nominee Tim Walz’s support of LGBTQ+ rights.

Other right-wing commentators, like Ben Shapiro, took another approach: making fun of Swifties. “Note: if you vote for a particular candidate because your favorite singer is doing so, please don’t vote. You are too stupid to vote,” wrote Shapiro on X. Meanwhile, Elon Musk, the richest man on the planet, threatened to impregnate her.

  • Todd Bonzalez
    link
    fedilink
    123
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    “I will impregnate her” -Elon Musk

    “She will be raped by Venezuelans” -David Rubin

    “Children’s Genitals!” -Megyn Kelly

    Weird…

  • @riodoro1
    link
    615 days ago

    Imagine living in the US 💀

  • @hOrni
    link
    464 days ago

    I must admit that I don’t get, why it’s such a big deal, that Taylor Swift supports Harris. But seeing the meltdown of the right wing grifters does put a smile on my face.

  • @SLVRDRGN
    link
    284 days ago

    It’s funny how Taylor Swift mattered when Trump faked her endorsement.

  • kamenLady.
    link
    2995 days ago

    “F you, Taylor Swift!” shouted Megyn Kelly, “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

    Weird

    • @DrCake
      link
      1485 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
        link
        875 days ago

        And the reason more than one woman has needed a hysterectomy after being denied a medically necessary abortion.

            • @Passerby6497
              link
              English
              55 days ago

              Yeah they traditionally just get the truthiness level by looking it up in their gut. standing up and pulling it out of their butt

                • @Fedizen
                  link
                  25 days ago

                  he’s just saying the quiet part out loud (your gut includes your colon)

      • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
        link
        English
        165 days ago

        In the U.S. it’s not necessarily a christian thing. But the ven diagram of people who circumcise their children in the U.S. and chrstians is very close to a circle.

        • @Boddhisatva
          link
          245 days ago

          But the ven diagram of people who circumcise their children in the U.S. and chrstians is very close to a circle.

          Sorry, but that’s not even close. Male circumcision is very commonly practiced among the Jewish and Islamic faiths as well as American Christians, who I guess just can’t resist a fad.

          According to current estimations, approximately 30% of all males across the world— representing a total of approximately 670 million men — are circumcised. Of this number, about 68% are of Islamic faith, less than 1% of Jewish faith, and 13% are non-Muslim, non-Jewish Americans.

          • @angrystego
            link
            115 days ago

            You’re giving the world numbers. Olgratin was talking about the US. I don’t know the US numbers but they could very well be quite different.

          • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
            link
            English
            95 days ago

            Which is why I said it was very close, not “a damn near circle” like people normally say with that phrase.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -45 days ago

        God can we please leave this weird obsession with circumcision on reddit? You’re not wrong, it’s just such a weird thing to focus on all the goddamn time.

        • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
          link
          English
          95 days ago

          It’s a bodily autonomy issue that has justifiably left a lot of men feeling powerless and angry. People are gonna talk about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -55 days ago

            It’s a dick topic of extremely minimal consequence in the grand scheme that just makes spaces like this looks like a bunch of dick-obsessed weirdos complaining because their dicks are too small.

            Like I said, you’re not wrong on the topic, it’s just being so focused on the topic in the first place is fucking weird.

            • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
              link
              English
              145 days ago

              It’s a dick topic of extremely minimal consequence in the grand scheme

              I disagree. I think this country has a problem with respecting bodily autonomy, and a large part of that is men trying to legislate women’s bodies. Showing these men that they have a horse in the bodily autonomy race so to speak is a good thing. Maybe it’s only a minimal effect, but it’s a potential pathway out of harmful beliefs.

              this looks like a bunch of dick-obsessed weirdos complaining because their dicks are too small.

              it’s just being so focused on the topic in the first place is fucking weird.

              I’ve been on lemmy for about a year now. And this one off handed thread is the only place I’ve seen this topic discussed, in the entirety of this last year. I think you are vastly overstating the frequency to which this is discussed.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -35 days ago

                To the first point, I’d argue that men centering themselves in the discussion which largely centers around attempts to remove bodily autonomy from women only hurts, not helps the cause.

                To the second point, it has come up a few times, but yes, the reason I said “leave this on reddit” was preemptive, before the problem migrates here from reddit where the topic is rampant is insanely zealous most often.

                • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
                  link
                  English
                  35 days ago

                  I’d argue that men centering themselves in the discussion which largely centers around attempts to remove bodily autonomy from women only hurts, not helps the cause.

                  I think we’d have to take a poll from the general population and compare it with a poll from an anti-circumcision group and compare it to be sure.

                  Regardless, I said it was a pathway, not a guarantee.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Not in the slightest. I’ll happily talk dicks with you all day; I’m extremely sexually liberal.

                But talking about dicks isn’t the same as listening to a bunch of chud weirdos whining and crying about the world’s least consequential issue that’s they’re only mad about because deep down they ignorantly think their tiny dicks would be bigger if they hadn’t had their foreskins stolen.

                Again, it’s just a weird fucking thing to focus on. Bring it up when the topic comes up, of course, but to fucking insert it in conversations as if it’s relevant, as was done in this post, will always be weird.

                But hey, if you wanna talk about dicks for fun, I’m game. Mine curves slightly to the left, how about you?

    • Todd Bonzalez
      link
      fedilink
      1385 days ago

      The current Republican platform is largely based on stupid easily disproven lies. I’m convinced our fall to fascism is caused by stupidity as much as it is hatred.

      “Doctors are cutting little boys dicks off because they like the color pink!”

      “They’re performing abortions after birth!”

      “Haitians are eating all the cats and dogs!”

      “They’re putting litter boxes in the school bathrooms!”

      There’s really only two kinds of Republican: The evil ones who spread these lies intentionally, and the stupid ones who believe this dumb shit.

      • @Clent
        link
        365 days ago

        Hatred is stupidity. Always has been.

        • @Landless2029
          link
          185 days ago

          Hatred is also taught.

          Its sad that kids are in MAGA as well due to this.

        • @frunch
          link
          45 days ago

          This is why evil rarely succeeds in the long-term: when you have that many self-absorbed fucks attempt to work together, it rarely yields anything useful.

          • @Omgpwnies
            link
            English
            24 days ago

            yeah, but it takes a fraction of the time to destroy than to build. They don’t need long-term, they can wreak havoc in one term

      • @dejected_warp_core
        link
        225 days ago

        The current Republican platform is largely based on stupid easily disproven lies.

        It’s worth mentioning that this strategy is straight out of the trolling playbook. The overall idea is to get everyone to waste their time arguing nonsense, making it impossible to discuss anything of merit. While the following article applies to internet forums, it’s not hard to see how any social media, TV, or radio, can spill over into our day-to-day discourse and have the same effect: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573649/

        In this case, the topic at hand meets multiple criteria for deliberate trolling. IMO, there’s little room for doubt that we’re being led by the nose and baited to waste valuable pre-election time:

        • Digression - Luring others into off-topic discussions by spamming, partaking in cascades or introducing tangential topics (e.g., as in [16]).
        • (Hypo)criticism - Excessive criticism of others, e.g. on their punctuation while possibly committing the same errors oneself.
        • Antipathy - Creation of a sensitive or antagonistic context through purposeful provocation, in order to manipulate others to produce emotional responses.
        • Endangering - Giving out poor advice under an innocent guise, and others are compelled to respond in order to protect others.
        • Shocking - Posting about taboos or sensitive subjects, such as religion, death or human rights.
        • Aggression - Deliberate and open aggressing of others into retaliating (e.g., by name-calling or foul language).
        • @Donjuanme
          link
          55 days ago

          I would love to see more of the Democrats platform displayed, argued, justified and rationalized, but there’s literally no reason to talk about any of that when the other side has less discussion than a headless chicken.

          I hope the right can someday see how bad they are for policy in general.

      • @micka190
        link
        95 days ago

        The litter box thing annoys me so much. Like, do you have any idea how quickly that shit would fucking go viral if it were true? Like, every damn kid would post about it online. It’s so fucking stupid!

        • Fiona
          link
          fedilink
          34 days ago

          do you have any idea how quickly that shit would fucking go viral if it were true

          But it was true! Just not in the way that was claimed: They had these litterboxes in case they had to barricade in the classroom for extended periods of time due to a school-shooter that the police didn’t bother to stop quickly…

          So yes, it really is a fucked up story, just in a very different way from what republicans claimed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 days ago

        Nonense! There’s a third kind who is both stupid and evil. They may even be the majority.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 days ago

      Remember when NBC hired Kelly in 2017, she gave Putin a platform to spread his propaganda, she got demoted, and then eventually fired for racism? Who could have guessed that she was just another maga conspiracy nut?

    • Peetabix
      link
      English
      105 days ago

      Megyn? How is that supposed to be pronounced?

      • @TriPolarBearz
        link
        135 days ago

        Actually, this name traces all the way back to the first cavewoman gynecologist. At the time, they named themselves based on their professions. Megyn is short for “me gynecologist”.

      • Leraje
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 days ago

        Weirdo Republican Talking Head No. 3464592

      • @irreticent
        link
        14 days ago

        Wow, I didn’t know Megyn Kelly was such a staunch circumcision opponent

        Mud flaps down to her knees.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    985 days ago

    If they didn’t want her to voice her opinion they shouldn’t have spent a week making fake ai images of her endorsing Trump. They forced her hand; she could either allow her likeness to be appropriated for a political cause she doesn’t agree with, or make her true opinion known.

    • @thejoker954
      link
      34 days ago

      Shes just an uppity women. She should do what I say. -Republicants.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -514 days ago

      Could just as easily have been a democrat trying to draw her endorsement. Its silly to point blame like that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        304 days ago

        I love how you obviously have no idea what’s been going on the past week, but you still felt the need to try and defend Republican weirdos.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -34 days ago

          Not defending republicans. Why couldn’t some sneaky democrat realize they could bait her into it with AI art.

          Trump didnt make the art. He is an idiot for sharing it though. Can’t be too hard to get him to retweet something stupid though.

        • @Valmond
          link
          144 days ago

          But maybe he did it because democrats fooled him into doing it, right? Right?

          • Karyoplasma
            link
            fedilink
            94 days ago

            After eating someone’s dog, the Haitians pressured Trump to post it because they’re criminals. Or something.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              03 days ago

              The point I’m making is the art could have come from anyone. Why not a troll or shitposters? 4chan has done stuff like this for literal decades.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Yes, technically it could have come from anyone.
                So let’s give the wannabe fascist republicans the benefit of the doubt, because that has historically been a very double plus good idea to do for authoritarians, and only good things will come from doing so…

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 days ago

                  I don’t think this makes trump look good either way, I’m not defending him.

                  Either he’s an idiot who got tricked into posting something he should have known not to, or he’s an idiot who has idiot friends who sent him something and he posted it.

                  I thought she was going to sue him for it.

              • Karyoplasma
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                But then you tweet dumb shit 4chan says. How does that make you look more like a stable adult?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 days ago

                  Never said I was defending what trump did. Just said he could have been duped into it. I actually thought shed sue him over it but I guess the endorsement works.

          • @barsquid
            link
            34 days ago

            This is such a hilarious conspiracy theory that person has.

            Here is what happened: Leon put out an image generator that would create images of real people. Donald is desperate for attention. Donald wanted to fantasize what if A-list celebrities liked him, so he typed it in. He then shared it publicly.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -13 days ago

              You have a source that says Donald trump made the images with his own prompts? Why wouldnt he be sued for that. Reposting someone else’s images was already risky enough.

              I’ll believe it though if you know where I can read about that.

              Not a conspiracy theory by the way, was just saying ai art from the internet could come from anyone, and shitposters and trolls exist. Theres even a professional board for it called 4chan.

              • @barsquid
                link
                13 days ago

                Donald is the shitposting troll that this AI art came from, though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 days ago

          I’m calling trump an easily manipulable idiot, not defending him.

          Who did make the taylor swift art anyways?

      • @barsquid
        link
        14 days ago

        I’m certain Dems did ask her for endorsement, there is no way they wouldn’t have, right? But they didn’t make weird AI images, did they? So it is wildly different and deserves blame and criticism, doesn’t it?

        Donald is like the stereotypical pathetic incel stalker pasting his face over a boyfriend in a photo to add to a weird little shrine. Just really fucking weird and creepy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          03 days ago

          So let’s say I made the AI images. And posted them on republican forums knowing they would eat them up. Keep sending them to bigger and bigger names, make a not farm to make the posts visible.

          Finally I get the big cheetoh to repost it. Boom, I a democrat, have instigated Taylor Swift into endorsing the Democrats.

          • @barsquid
            link
            13 days ago

            Do it, then, wreck their campaign by getting Donald to post more weird AI images that force other celebrities to endorse the Dems.

  • @Lauchs
    link
    1325 days ago

    Republicans: Cancel culture is ruining the country!

    Also Republicans: You endorsed Harris? Kiss your Republican record sales goodbye!

      • @rottingleaf
        link
        -115 days ago

        … of non-autistic humans. Which is why I like systems not reliant on what somebody considers kind.

        • @kofe
          link
          English
          75 days ago

          Wait what? I can’t tell if you’re serious, but if so, I’d love to see research on the first part of your comment. If you were joking please feel free to ignore me.

          • @rottingleaf
            link
            -45 days ago

            No, just experience.

            “Normal” people lie and bend morals so naturally that they don’t see it. The discourse in their social bubble is more important than reality for them. They can say and believe absolutely contradictory things, which just have to be accepted as true by their social environment.

            How can there be any research on this? It’s literally normal. It’s how political agitation works.

            About autistic people not doing this - autistic people take discourses even more radically, but that kinda helps, because you have to check yourself for your perceptions to work with the real world at all. Also due to the effort needed to switch between various discourses, which happens naturally for normals, autistic people notice the fact that they switch.

            Normals don’t need that and thus can live all their life in common dreams.

            I think I could find something more scientific to read on these things, but why would I really, it’s obvious.

            • @kofe
              link
              English
              45 days ago

              One of my favorite pass times is asking ChatGPT my hypotheses with prompts to search the web for academic sources (the free version is limited, but it works for a good few prompts over a few hours and let’s you know when the cool down period is over).

              Any time we make claims, it’s very likely at this stage of human technology that there’s research on it you can access and hone ideas around. Anecdotes can be really powerful in driving our interests and pursuit of knowledge, but I think we should always check in and be aware we’re biased, fallible, sometimes hypocritical creatures.

              • @rottingleaf
                link
                -35 days ago

                I’m not sure if you are reinforcing the request for a source or agreeing with me, ha-ha.

                I’ll try. But my own experience with using those chatbots to find sources is not satisfactory, but then I was trying to find sources on very specific things.

                • @kofe
                  link
                  English
                  13 days ago

                  I was reinforcing the request. I did a couple general prompts with your claim and think there’s some research to support it, though it’s not much; and, as with anything, there’s nuance.

          • @rottingleaf
            link
            1
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Impaired social abilities mean smaller attack surface for propaganda and groupthink.

            Seems obvious, that’s the main thing autism is, that’s why it’s called a u t i s m .

    • @masinko
      link
      64 days ago

      No no no, you see, when the left does it, it’s cancel culture and literally communism. When the right does it, it’s voting with your dollar, literally capitalism. Not comparable at all!!

      /s

    • @Omgpwnies
      link
      English
      24 days ago

      Which is hilarious since the main source of income for musicians ever since streaming took off is live shows and merch… albums are a vehicle to drive attendance at concerts, for which Swift is pretty good at packing stadiums full of people. Even if she loses 30% of her listeners, she’ll still sell out concerts and total revenue would likely be about the same because those seats will be taken up by other fans who would have otherwise missed out on the sold-out show.

  • @zeppo
    link
    English
    505 days ago

    On the flip side, imagine voting for someone because Ben Shapiro is doing so.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    344 days ago

    Trump threatened her for her endorsement. Anyone who thinks he has any redeeming qualities is beyond redemption.

  • @Plopp
    link
    1895 days ago

    “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

    As someone living in a country whey we don’t chop off the foreskin of little children, whereas conservative Americans love that chopping procedure, I find this statement slightly amusing.

      • @WhatAmLemmy
        link
        English
        33
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Babies. They mutilate the genitals of their babies because they believe their god desires it.

        It’s called mental illness. These people aren’t simply “weird”. They’re insane, a danger to their children, their communities, and their country.

        • @kofe
          link
          English
          35 days ago

          There’s some truth in this, but I think we should be mindful of nuance. Some parents do need to make decisions for medical reasons. Those reasons are often still exaggerated, and many parents aren’t making an informed decision. I’ve had friends that required the procedure after puberty, but I’m pretty sure they’ve said there was no way they could have known prior to puberty anyway. I don’t know anyone that needed it as a baby, but it can happen when obstructions develop in utero.

          • @WhatAmLemmy
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Circumcision as medical treatment is fine, as long as it’s legitimate; though I also have a strong suspicion that most medical circumcision — due to phimosis — is actually due to the sexual shame of religious “cultures”, and simply wouldn’t be necessary if parents actually washed their babies/infants penises properly (by pulling back the foreskin) and teaching them to do the same. Obviously the foreskin stiffens and fuses shut when it’s not stretched for years — no different to any other body part. I remember it took weeks to masturbate because I rarely pulled the skin back, and trying to do so took time to stretch it out. I could have easily ended up with phimosis in slightly different circumstances… I could barely touch my toes 3 months ago; now, after stretching a few times a week, I can stand on my palms.

            It’s not like a significant number of other ape species experience this disorder. If the foreskin wasn’t beneficial then we wouldn’t have it. We don’t cut our ears off because it’s easier to clean the area without them, either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          04 days ago

          They mutilate the genitals of their babies because John Harvey Kellogg thought it would prevent masturbation

    • Phenomephrene
      link
      fedilink
      345 days ago

      But that’s how you show God that your baby deserves to be in Heaven!!!

      🌭🪓✝️

      • Kalkaline
        link
        fedilink
        305 days ago

        I didn’t know we were doing genital checks at the Pearly Gates, God is a weirdo.

        • @Eatspancakes84
          link
          175 days ago

          Also, especially since your body remains on earth. Does your soul have genitalia?

          • @Passerby6497
            link
            English
            185 days ago

            No, but your souls takes that piece of soul-foreskin with it and drops it off in a little turn style like a ticket.

            That’s how god gets it’s treats, I read that in the Bible.

        • @angrystego
          link
          35 days ago

          What did you think the “pearly” in Pearly Gates was about?

      • @Dkarma
        link
        -425 days ago

        Nah that’s how you avoid STDs and dick cheese tho… 🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          235 days ago

          Wearing a condom and showering are how you prevent those. There are slight to moderate reductions in a few STDs/STIs, but wearing a condom is the actual prevention method instead of a coin flip. This isn’t to mention that cutting or burning a portion of a human off should probably involve some consent.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            75 days ago

            Lul that dude is telling on himself for his level of hygiene. As someone with a foreskin I keep mine extremely clean, if I’m at home I even rinse and dry after peeing. Also, some girls are Into foreskin.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          125 days ago

          The solution to athlete’s foot is to chop off your toes. Harder to get foot fungus without all those pointless crevices.

    • @Sanctus
      link
      English
      8
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      They have a covenant with their diety about slicing up little baby penises and this is the shit they say. Incredible.

  • MobileDecay
    link
    655 days ago

    The party of rapists, child molesters and murderers is mad at Taylor Swift. She must’ve done something right. 🤔

  • @paddirn
    link
    English
    294 days ago

    I’m sure MAGAts are having to do mental jumping jacks from approving of a fake endorsement for Trump to now saying that her endorsement for Harris doesn’t really matter and that she’s a nobody. The whole thing is dumb either way, but if a pop star’s endorsement is what it takes to hold off the fascists for at least 4 more years, then so be it.

  • @pivot_root
    link
    1205 days ago

    Elmo basically threatened to rape her… Shitbag.

  • p3n
    link
    595 days ago

    The argument that “you shouldn’t vote for someone just because your favorite celebrity endorses them” seemed like a much more credible argument before the 2016 election when the winning candidate essentially won by literally being a celebrity.

    Prior to 2016, Trump was probably best known for being the host of a reality TV show, and being a “businessman”. Taylor Swift is definitely better known, and you could also make a solid argument that she is a better “businessman” as well.

  • @unrigged6112
    link
    21
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Why the hate They got the endorsment of quality stars like Kid rock, Kanye, Kevin sorbo, Hulk Hogan, Elon musk,

    Al fine gentlemen /s