‘Donald Trump is losing his marbles,’ former Congressman and Republican Adam Kinzinger said

Republicans are concerned that party leader Donald Trump is having a “public nervous breakdown” after he made a series of offensive outbursts about Vice President Kamala Harris as he slips behind her in the polls.

The former president has made a number of  insulting personal attacks against his Democratic rival since she moved to the top of the ticket. Last week, Trump questioned Harris’s racial identity  at the National Association of Black Journalists conference. Over the weekend, he accused Harris of having a “low IQ.”

New polls indicate Trump is slipping behind the vice president in the popular vote and races are tightening in battleground states.

“This is what you would call a public nervous breakdown,” Matthew Bartlett, a Republican strategist and former Trump state department appointee, told Politico.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    2284 months ago

    They’re only worried that it will happen before the election.

    • @dhork
      link
      English
      1194 months ago

      Well, they probably also realize that if it happens after he wins, and he can’t continue in office, then no couch in the country is safe.

  • @NewNewAccount
    link
    1874 months ago

    Headlines like this have existed for the entire time Trump has been in the political spotlight.

    Do not trust conservatives will see this and agree. Do not get complacent. Vote. Encourage friends and family to vote.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      47
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      At this point the people who are already Trump supporters will not be swayed. He was always nuts, he was always weird, he always spewed out nonsensical word-salad. The fight is for independents who are still on the fence, and everyone on both sides considers them gullible idiots, and campaign strategy will reflect that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        184 months ago

        Everyone correctly considers them gullible idiots when it comes to politics.

        All those people will have other areas of individual expertise as well.

      • @ripcord
        link
        114 months ago

        Also the supporters who aren’t diehards. Most races are won largely by just how motivated likely voters are to show up.

        Largely why Hillary lost.

    • @Landless2029
      link
      214 months ago

      My concern with Harris running is all the positivity will get people complacent due to the polls.

      Polls don’t mean shit. Get out and vote. Tell everyone to go vote.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        The Republicans will cheat, swindle and intimidate to win this election. They will break every rule they can, and they don’t even need the popular vote in order to win. Trump might be shitting the bed but this is still far from over. The only way to keep him out of the white house is if people vote against him in vast enough numbers to counteract their cheating.

    • @samus12345
      link
      English
      64 months ago

      They’re not wrong, it’s just that being in a breakdown/meltdown state is normal for him.

  • Nomecks
    link
    fedilink
    119
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s called a Narcissist Shame/Rage Spiral.

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      464 months ago

      There’s only a handful of people in the world trump could beat in an election…

      And he never imagined Biden would actually get out of the way, so he has no idea what to do now that it’s not Biden.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        50
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I am absolutely convinced that Trump’s entire election strategy was to just coast to victory on “Biden old” and “I got shot”. By the time of the republican convention he was confident that he had it in the bag and didn’t need to keep trying, so when Biden dropped out it completely shattered his plan and he’s got nothing to replace it. He does not have the cognitive ability to pivot against Harris/Walz and his ego is way too big to actually listen to his campaign strategists (if he even has any that aren’t just yes men).

        * this should not be interpreted as complacency. It is definitely not a sure thing that Harris will win

        • @givesomefucks
          link
          English
          204 months ago

          Harris isn’t a guaranteed win, but she’d have to royally fuck up to blow this election.

          trump just isn’t as popular as he used to be. The last two elections there was trump shit all over my red state. I haven’t seen a single trump bumpper sticker. Not even old ones from prior elections.

          • @dhork
            link
            English
            234 months ago

            If there’s one thing I’ve learned in my life, though, it’s to never underestimate the ability of a Democrat to royally fuck something up.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              64 months ago

              She’s got a long list of stuff to fix that will require both houses of congress. If we give her a majority of non-moderate Dems there’s hope. Obama didn’t fuck up too bad besides trying to compromise with Rs for “bipartisanship” until they retook the House and Senate at which point they kneecapped him politically. He was too much an idealist imo. She seems wise enough to not fall for that. Maybe I’m giving her too much credit but being media quiet while VP has allowed her to more easily distance from Biden’s shittier policies like Israel-Palestine and push for more on climate/women now that she has a campaign lead by herself.

              Since I know and support many of her stated policy stances the biggest question for me is how to reform SCOTUS, regulate voting rights (e.g. RCV or France style) and stop media disinformation without infringing on the 1st amendment.

          • @PriorityMotif
            link
            114 months ago

            The only reason anybody has ever put out a Trump flag, bumper sticker, worn a red hat is because they want to bait people into a confrontation. It turns out, it’s just a way of telling people not to talk to you because you are just looking for a confrontation.

          • @Starbuck
            link
            3
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I think this is something that is hard to overstate. Back in 2016, I went out to northern Pennsylvania to see a friend out there, and the amount of Trump shit I saw blew my blue state mind. Then I did another trip down to North Carolina and saw so much.

            In 2020, I went out to both of those places again and there was a bunch of 2016 stuff out there, but not as much new stuff.

            I haven’t been up to see my friend in a few years now, but driving through parts of North Carolina I don’t see anything, new or old. I think the rank and file are getting sick of him.

            And on top of that, I think Democrats are genuinely excited about Harris Walz. Everyone I know in my blue state went from quiet resignation in voting for Biden to energized. Obviously it only matters if you actually vote, but hopefully everyone feels like they have a good reason this time to vote for someone instead of just against someone. It’s not enough to just win the presidency, we need to run up the numbers and take congress.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34 months ago

            That shit is still everywhere where I am. Vote as if he’s a popular as he ever was, because in some areas he sure seems to be.

    • @lewdian69
      link
      184 months ago

      I get the rage but shame? That’s not a thing Trump has

      • @Num10ck
        link
        English
        184 months ago

        narcissists don’t shame themselves, they try to shame non-loyalists.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 months ago

        I think he feels shame, but not about things that would make a normal person feel shame. Like, I’m pretty sure losing or appearing weak make him feel shame, but hurting people doesn’t.

        • @samus12345
          link
          English
          54 months ago

          No, I don’t think those things make him feel shame, either, just anger.

  • @IchNichtenLichten
    link
    English
    1044 months ago

    If he wins, his legal troubles go away. If he loses they come back with a vengeance.

    Looks like this weird old man is starting to get nervous and lash out.

    Please continue.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      424 months ago

      Finding out the Supreme Court isn’t going give him unlimited power might’ve blown a gasket.

      On top of what you said if Harris wins a prosecutor who Trump constantly insults will be president, and Biden, who Trump also insults and put his son in prison, will have 3 months to do whatever the fuck he wants. Lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        374 months ago

        All true except Biden had nothing to do with his son being prosecuted. At most, Biden will allow him to go to prison by leaving office without pardoning him (which I believe he will do, because it’s the not-corrupt thing to do.)

        • @dhork
          link
          English
          304 months ago

          No, he absolutely should pardon Hunter. He should acknowledge the hypocrisy in a public statement, though. He should note the broad power the Supreme Court has given him to take Official Actions like this with impunity, and double-dog dare Congress to do whatever it takes to rein in abuses like that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            194 months ago

            This would actually be pretty cool, and might even work to restore some balance to the scales of justice. Alas, I don’t think Biden has the requisite cojones.

            • @dhork
              link
              English
              84 months ago

              Since it involves his kid, though, he might find the juice to do it.

              • @toasteecup
                link
                English
                154 months ago

                I don’t think it’s a matter of having the chutzpah or not.

                Biden at his core is a pretty solid straight lace public servant. He listens to the majority of the people and tries to do what’s best for the country. While that move would be great for the country, it goes against his straight lacedness.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            104 months ago

            It’s not an abuse, or at least not a new abuse. Presidents always had pardon power, and trump himself pardoned his friends. Nothing to do with the SC ruling.

            • @dhork
              link
              English
              114 months ago

              But he can now highlight it as an “official act”, which means that he can do whatever he wants, no backsies.

              He can further drive the point home by publically stating that Hunter gave him a $5 “gratuity” afterwards, and daring Mike Johnson to impeach him over it.

          • @theangryseal
            link
            74 months ago

            I mean, this is what I’d do.

            I try hard to hold onto my moral compass and practice what I preach, but when it comes to my kids I probably could go hard. Especially if they were facing a future in a cage. If I had the power I just wouldn’t let it happen.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          Biden should direct the ATF to pull Marijuana Receipts and IDs from dispensary logs. Then compare that against FID card dates and charge the lot of them.

          Conservatives would howl about prosecution, then he can just pardon all of them, including his son.

      • @IchNichtenLichten
        link
        English
        84 months ago

        Amazing how quickly things can turn around. I was getting worried when Biden was still in the race. Now it’s open season on those peculiar far right oddballs.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
      link
      English
      574 months ago

      “If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed and we will deserve it.” - Lindsey Graham

      • @samus12345
        link
        English
        84 months ago

        Important to note that what Lindsey meant was that they would get “destroyed” in the election (which obviously did not happen), not that the party itself would be destroyed. But I hope that second meaning comes to pass regardless.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
          link
          English
          24 months ago

          Let’s hope in hindsight it feels like a Monkey’s Paw Event

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    764 months ago

    Has his behavior changed? Trump seems to be spouting the same kind of nonsense he always has. This just seems to be more of the same weird rants.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The behavior hasn’t substantially changed, but the narrative is shifting. Trump took office on the back of a wave of sardonic, nihilistic memes. He was constantly excused for being bigoted and unintelligible because his dork enlightenment cronies could cynically spin everything as nine dimensional water backgammon. The fact they weren’t making sense was a plus, not a minus.

      Biden dropping out and team Kamala stepping up so hard so fast on the meme front has completely taken the right by surprise. They weren’t mobilized to defend against this. So now they’re on the back foot, the memes from the mainstream left are sharper and meaner than Trumpworld has ever had to deal with before, and the messaging is laser focused.

      Spouting nonsense only works if it looks like you’re winning by doing so. Don just keeps showing how old, tired, and weak he really is, so the cracks are forming. Just think of all the political capital he’s spent trying to make diapers cool, and then he makes a VP pick who Snopes has confirmed literally fucked a couch on live video.

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      384 months ago

      The best time to wake up to that Donald Trump is a weird racist who should be ignored was 1988. The second best time is now

      • Optional
        link
        144 months ago

        “I think we’re starting to see the old Trump that a lot of Republicans got tired of in 2020, got tired of defending him,”

        Oh are they tired of defending a traitorous rapist conman? They’re tired of defending a sociopath and grotesque manbaby for the singular purpose of jamming through the most regressive laws and judges anyone could imagine? Awwww. Poor lot of republiQans.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          74 months ago

          Let’s not be fooled. They defended him because he could help them. Now that he’s not polling as favorably, trump has less to offer for their support

          • Optional
            link
            4
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Is that better than cultishly believing his obvious lies?

        • @Burn_The_Right
          link
          54 months ago

          Why should they be tired? After scouring the nation for the person who most accurately represents them, conservatives have consistently chosen Trump as the one who most closely reflects their sentiments. He is their accurate reflection.

          They’ve re-affirmed their leader for eight solid years now. They get to own this and they should never be thought of apart from him. Just as nazis are always associated with Hitler, Republicans should always be associated with Trump. Always.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    644 months ago

    It’s rich that he is claiming she has a low IQ when he got gentlemen Cs while at Penn. One of his professors called him his worst student ever.

      • @Wogi
        link
        214 months ago

        Missing some inflection

        “Donald Trump was the dumbest goddamn student I ever had.”

        -Dr William T Kelley, numerous times over the course of 3 decades.

    • @Buddahriffic
      link
      144 months ago

      Also his obsession with those two cognitive tests he didn’t fail isn’t a great sign for his IQ either.

      Maybe I’m the dumb one, but a “cognition test” sounds to me like something they do after someone has received some head trauma to make sure it didn’t break their brain or for an old person to see if they are going senile. Like a test where “tell me your name” is part of the test rather than part of the supporting paperwork.

      Though maybe his handlers told him it was a genius test or something like that and no one has had the heart/guts to break it to him since.

      • SeaJ
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You are correct. A cognition tests look to see if you are having severe mental cognitive issues. The questions are extremely basic like doing connect the dots or identifying a lion.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    544 months ago

    Over the weekend, he accused Harris of having a “low IQ.”

    How about this: instead of a debate they both take an IQ test created and administered by a neutral party. Recordings of them taking the test will be released to the public once they are both finished.

    • @Burn_The_Right
      link
      284 months ago

      For a conservative, only a conservative qualifies as “neutral”. Everyone else is “the extreme left”.

      • @Treczoks
        link
        104 months ago

        For some Republicans, even some other Republicans are “the extreme left”.

    • @AnUnusualRelic
      link
      234 months ago

      Trump would boast that he managed to colour inside the lines “and they were very small lines!”.

      • @SparrowRanjitScaur
        link
        264 months ago

        Test administrator’s response: “Sir there was no coloring portion on this test.”

        • @Snowclone
          link
          44 months ago

          But I brought my own markers!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      194 months ago

      I want them to take a test on basic US history, and/or the intelligence test from idiocracy.
      I’m actually pretty curious about how trump would do with matching the shaped blocks to the corresponding holes.

      • @Snowclone
        link
        34 months ago

        I’m like 50/50 on if Trump knows the year, just the year, the US was founded on. Even if he gets the tip ‘‘Philadelphia has a Basketball Team’’

        • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
          link
          44 months ago

          I mean, that’s kind of ambiguous. 1775, 1776, 1783 and 1789 could all be argued to be the founding year.

          • @Snowclone
            link
            14 months ago

            There is an offical year, man.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      74 months ago

      Nah fuck it have the test fully made by the opposing party and “Kamabla” would still whoop him

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That… Might actually be a better option. They could throw whatever nonsense at Kamala and she’ll still do well, and he’ll get basic questions relevant to government and fail abysmally.

        Question 1: “Who legally won the 2020 US presidential election?”

        Even better: after both parties submit their questions, they are told the candidates will have to answer both tests.

    • [email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      How about a one question test: have you ever tried to overthrow the government of the United States?

    • @systemglitch
      link
      64 months ago

      I wonder how one would find an actual neutral party with one of the most polarizeing people in history involved.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        As long as they were provided with the same test, the same answer key was used, and we are able to watch each of them take the test, it really shouldn’t matter. Even if the test was “name Trump’s children” Kamala would score higher.

        Doesn’t matter, it’s not like he’d ever agree to publicly displaying his actual, measurable, level of intelligence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      There aren’t any people who are neutral on the politics of the most powerful country in the world

      • @Snowclone
        link
        24 months ago

        Not even Russia? I’m SHOCKED!!!

  • @dhork
    link
    English
    484 months ago

    … But they will vote for him anyway, because doing otherwise is basically admitting you were wrong all along, and they would never do that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104 months ago

      And, I dont understand how he could, now, be having a public nervous breakdown, if he wasn’t before. He always made personal attacks.

      • @smayonak
        link
        34 months ago

        When narcissists become triggered they have a fight or flight response. Trump is having that same response every day of his life. He was having it during the coup, he was having it when he was raping, he was having it when he got convicted. The observation that Trump is mentally crumbling is true. But it’s something that he does daily.

        Just think how contorted someone’s thinking must be I’m order to derive their self worth from a poll.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      Yeah, it’s just one of the Never Trumpers who doesn’t even have a seat anymore, Kinzinger. The others have either kissed the ring or been kicked out of office.

  • Adderbox76
    link
    fedilink
    English
    274 months ago

    Theoretically, what would happen if this close to the election, the stress causes a blood vessel to burst and Trump just strokes out?

    I mean, besides the post-jedi levels of celebration, would Vance just be inserted into the ticket if it’s too far along to have a new primary?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Is being alive a qualification to be elected? I have no doubt Trump’s people will try to pull an Air Bud “there’s no rule that says a dog can’t play basketball” move.

    • @HWK_290
      link
      English
      17
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      A bigger question is, how could we tell that even happened?

      Edit: I mean short of him dying or becoming a drooling vegetable. The man is already deeply deranged and exhibiting significant mental declind

    • @dhork
      link
      English
      15
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Once the individual state filing deadlines have passed, it’s likely that Trump/Vance would have to remain on the ballot. But this is one instance where the Electoral College helps, because the election is not for the candidates themselves, it is for electors who support the ticket. And the final certification of electors is up to each State Legislature.

      So, if God exercises His Ultimate Veto on Trump’s Presidency, it will be commonly understood that Vance would take over the ticket. He will pick a new VP, and any former Trump/Vance electors would likely cast electoral votes for Vance/Chesterfield instead. While it is possible that State Democrats might challenge this, it’s also absurd to force electors to vote for someone who can no longer take office, so it’s likely that States would give their blessing to the substitution. Particularly if Harris is the overall winner regardless, and the Republican EC votes are simply for the historical record, and have no effect on the outcome.

      • @wjrii
        link
        English
        114 months ago

        Vance/Chesterfield

        First VP with a sexual harassment claim against their boss?

    • @modus
      link
      84 months ago

      His cult would still vote for him if he’s got a pulse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      74 months ago

      Based on what I’ve seen Republicans claiming online, prompted by recent changes in the Democratic ticket, such a change would be very dangerous to our democracy and therefore we should go forward with Trump being President despite the minor setback of being dead.

    • finley
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      after the Yub Nub festival, presumably Vance should step up, but, given his shocking unpopularity, the RNC could nominate someone entirely different.

      nobody knows. it has never happened before, so it would be new territory.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -24 months ago

        It’s almost always just power plays imo. On both sides.

        I think a big problem we have is that our populace is so large. We have a lot of culture and lifestyles to embrace, so politicians in order to appeal to the broad audience wash out most of who they actually are and end up with these surface level generalists who still have personalities below that we won’t see.

        Hard to be a singular representative for a large populace and stay popular.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -14 months ago

            Just trying to understand - are you saying that it’s not both sides?

            I personally think that republicans are more likely to go back on their word, but dems do it as well

            To address the problem we need to have the problem in full in front of us if we’re to eradicate the problem and not just swing a pendulum back and forth endlessly until the planet boils us alive

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Person A quietly swipes a pen off your desk.

              Person B robs a bank at gunpoint, and it goes bad, murdering 12 people in the process, including kids.

              “Obviously both sides must be talked about with the same weight of seriousness.” “That was my favorite pen, how dare he!!!” “They’re both thieves, and there’s no difference between them.” “They’re both the same.”

              Fuck that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                Not even a little bit what I meant, and you’re drawing false dichotomies

                I’ve said repeatedly in my comments in reply to this post that I don’t think it’s equal.

                Explicitly stated. I’ll take the optimist approach and assume you couldn’t be bothered to actually try and understand what I meant.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          54 months ago

          What exactly is “both sides” here? You’re getting pushback because that’s a loaded phrase and is basically never used in good faith. But show us this is an exception, if you can.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            04 months ago

            I was just expressing that I believe shallow politicians can exist on both sides, and do to some extent. Not drawing any specific statistics. To be clear, that means I’m also not saying both sides exhibit this characterization at an equal rate of occurrence, just that it is and has been happening on both sides.

            Politicians, like it or not and regardless of party lines, sometimes are just in it for the power and the glory.

            Again, this doesn’t happen at an equal rate on both sides, and I’m sure it does happen at a disproportionate rate, but it’s an overall problem that comes with positions of power and authority that I think should be tackled outside of party-specific focus. You could argue burning houses as rationale to target, but if there’s fires in both houses and you’re able to, you should take both out or the other will be just as bad at some point.

  • @Sludgehammer
    link
    English
    234 months ago

    ‘Donald Trump is losing his marbles,’

    He had some?

  • @RememberTheApollo_
    link
    174 months ago

    “Donald Trump is losing his marbles”

    Yeah, that’s been obvious for a while.

    I wonder if the republicans want to do a copycat switcheroo of the Dems replacing Biden and replace Trump with someone younger and more quietly fascist. But oh well, this is the monster they created. They’re stuck with him.

    • The Assman
      link
      fedilink
      74 months ago

      Pretty sure they can’t at this point, some Ohio deadline, which they need to win.

  • @DarkDecay
    link
    English
    134 months ago

    Could just be his old man dementia finally surfacing. He’s fucking old, the oldest presidential candidate for sure. He’s done, he should just drop out, it’s pathetic. #donewithdementiadon